Channel
@inclusiveheathenworldview
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
78subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003905232399 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @inclusiveheathenworldview |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 28 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/inclusiveheathenworldview |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 78 | +3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 75 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 72 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 74 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 71 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 66 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 66 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
30 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 16 | 53.3% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 26.7% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 16.7% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
BREAKING: Inclusive Heathens Demand Trigger Warnings Before Reading Traditional Lore In order to make history safer, activists are reportedly requesting content warnings before passages containing warfare, hierarchy, slavery, blood feuds, ancestor veneration, and other historically attested customs
BREAKING: Study Finds "Is This Creator Safe?" Really Means "Will They Affirm My Modern Worldview?" Researchers say participants showed little interest in whether content creators accurately represented the historical record. Instead, the strongest predictor of a "safe" rating was whether the creator affirmed the viewer's modern worldview. Traditional Heathens described this as "an unusual way to understand history."
😁3
BREAKING: Man discovers secret to becoming a spiritual leader. Step 1: Buy cloak. Step 2: Start podcast. Step 3: Declare yourself a Gothi.
😁7
BREAKING: "No Nazis In Valhöll" Claim Lacks Historical Evidence Following another week of social media activism, proponents of the slogan have once again failed to identify any historical source suggesting Odin selected the slain based on their modern political beliefs. "The biggest obstacle," one activist explained, "is that the sources keep talking about Germanic customs instead." Repeated attempts to locate ref…
💯5
BREAKING: Having never heard of inclusive heathenry, NAMBLA has now thrown its full support behind Bluesky influencer Guru Wolfsomethin, since they both agree that "love is love"—despite not knowing what heathenry is.
BREAKING: Psychologist Discover Epidemic Of Hitler Derangement Syndrome Symptoms include seeing Nazis behind every rune, myth, and apparently behind this runestone.
BREAKING: Woke Archaeologist Struggles To Name Chieftain Grave "The term 'chieftain' implies the existence of social hierarchy," one researcher explained. "We currently have no evidence of this beyond the wealth, prestige goods, imported luxury items, monumental burial mound, and the fact that everyone keeps calling him a chieftain."
"I fight for my people, our way of life, and our future" Burgerkingr Pepe
The real victim here is the activist who spent months imagining this conversation going very differently.
BREAKING: Heathen Activist Continues Speaking On Behalf Of People Who Never Asked Him To Witnesses report the activist was expecting applause, gratitude, and perhaps a nomination for Inclusive Heathen of the Year after unveiling his latest representation initiative. The celebration reportedly came to an abrupt halt when one of the people he had just "included" looked at the flag, looked back at him, and asked: "Br…
😁2
"YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT LGBT+ RIGHTS?!?" - no Thanks for coming! Happy White Boy Summer!
🤣5
BREAKING: Declaration 127 Signatories Left Confused After Discovering Traditional Heathenry Sources say concern began shortly after signatories of Declaration 127 learned that while the declaration advocates for modern civil rights, historical Heathen societies openly practiced slavery. Historians have described the discovery as "a rough introduction to the past."
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @inclusiveheathenworldview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Inclusive Heathen Worldview” (@inclusiveheathenworldview), 78 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inclusiveheathenworldview.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.