Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
46 measurements spanning 76 days, net +738. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,055–21,421 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 46
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 09:49
20,226
-111
5 Nov 2026, 12:15
20,337
-37
4 Nov 2026, 11:10
20,374
-6
3 Nov 2026, 10:04
20,380
+19
2 Nov 2026, 08:37
20,361
-4
1 Nov 2026, 12:10
20,365
-26
31 Oct 2026, 12:40
20,391
-153
30 Oct 2026, 14:19
20,544
-36
29 Oct 2026, 15:28
20,580
-17
28 Oct 2026, 13:04
20,597
+481
27 Oct 2026, 13:30
20,116
-16
26 Oct 2026, 12:07
20,132
-16
25 Oct 2026, 08:36
20,148
-21
24 Oct 2026, 05:45
20,169
-344
23 Oct 2026, 05:35
20,513
-7
22 Oct 2026, 04:19
20,520
-14
20 Oct 2026, 22:17
20,534
-8
19 Oct 2026, 21:35
20,542
-5
18 Oct 2026, 19:07
20,547
-18
17 Oct 2026, 16:27
20,565
first reading
Engagement
100 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 20,226 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,210
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 100 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
100 (18 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
59,651
Reactions total
696
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 03:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,400
Videos
≈1,000
Links
≈786
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
12m 38s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,230 reactions across 98 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
622
27.9%
🤬
338
15.2%
😨
295
13.2%
😱
191
8.57%
❤
166
7.44%
👏
140
6.28%
😢
128
5.74%
🙏
93
4.17%
🔥
83
3.72%
🤣
76
3.41%
🎉
73
3.27%
🕊
14
0.628%
😁
9
0.404%
🤔
2
0.09%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 99 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,230 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
6.00%
6 of 100 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
6
posts carrying an erid · 6 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,830
over 6 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,940
over 93 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvLV7du
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
2Vtzqvp6g7u
1
2 September 2026
2 September 2026
2Vtzqw3ebij
1
22 August 2026
22 August 2026
2Vtzqx1kc9L
1
30 October 2026
30 October 2026
2Vtzqx6VoLF
1
25 August 2026
25 August 2026
2VtzqxadwAu
1
28 October 2026
28 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (3.57%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Рубрика не у нас.
💔 Двадцать четыре года ада, клеймо чужих грехов и жалкие крохи за сломанные судьбы...
В Барнауле завершилась одна из самых жутких судебных историй региона, но принесла ли она долгожданный покой? Семья Анисимовых прошла через круги земного кошмара, отмываясь от незаслуженного позора.
🌑 Роковой 2000-й год
Той осенью жизнь Светланы и ее троих детей оборвалась. Александра Анисимова — любящего мужа и …
⚡️ Короткое замыкание стало причиной двух пожаров в Братске 5 ноября.
🏡 Днем (в 11:47) на улице Рябиновой (СОТ «Друзья природы») вспыхнул дачный дом. Пламя перекинулось на соседнюю хозпостройку. Пожар ликвидировали за два часа (уничтожено 12 кв.м дома и 15 кв.м постройки). Обошлось без пострадавших.
🚗 Вечером (в 22:25) на улице Илимской в Осиновке загорелся гараж. Огонь повредил 30 кв.м кровли, но соседние строения…
🥉 Братчанка Вера Серышева — призер Кубка России по бобслею!
На всероссийских стартах в Сочи спортсменка в экипаже-двойке с Алиной Колобовой завоевала бронзовую медаль. Девушки прошли трассу на высоком уровне, уступив победительницам всего 0,35 секунды!
📌 Тройка лидеров:
🥇 Макарова / Подобаева
🥈 Клименко / Трофимец
🥉 Серышева / Колобова *(Иркутская область / Краснодарский край)*
Поздравляем нашу землячку и ее трене…
⚠️ ЧП НА ЖЕЛЕЗНОЙ ДОРОГЕ В БРАТСКЕ: ИЗ ЦИСТЕРНЫ ВЫТЕКАЛА СЕРНАЯ КИСЛОТА
Опасный инцидент произошел на станции Падунские Пороги — в одном из вагонов товарного поезда была обнаружена течь токсичного груза.
🔹 Что предприняли спасатели и службы:
• Аварийную емкость молниеносно отцепили от состава и загнали в тупик на специальный путь.
• Бойцы экологической аварийно-спасательной службы обработали и зачистили цистерну — …
🚨 26 миллионов рублей подарила аферистам пенсионерка из Усть-Илимска: её убедили в «финансировании врагов»
Больше месяца пожилая женщина находилась под жестким психологическим прессингом телефонных мошенников, которые буквально «зомбировали» её сложными многоступенчатыми уловками.
🎭 Как развивался обман:
• «Выход на уровень региона»: Сначала жертве позвонили якобы из приёмной губернатора, а после на видеосвязь выше…
🐻🩸 Командировка, ставшая роковой: в тайге мужчина ценой собственной жизни спас жену от разъяренного медведя
Поездка в Иркутскую область обернулась невыносимой трагедией для специалистов, приехавших туда по работе из Казани. Дикий хищник ворвался в их временный лагерь.
🚪 Зверь с дикой яростью крушил двери и окна, пытаясь прорваться внутрь к людям. Поняв, что счет идет на секунды, мужчина принял страшное решение — он…
Сегодня вся Россия отмечает День народного единства 🇷🇺
Впервые в российской истории этот всенародный праздник был отмечен 4 ноября 2005 года, однако его история начинается намного раньше. Он учреждён в память об освобождении Москвы народным ополчением от польских интервентов в 1612 году.
Современная Россия — многонациональная страна, в которой сегодня проживают люди разных религий и этносов, которые, как показывает…
🚨 В Братске задержали курьера аферистов: пенсионер лишился более 3 млн рублей
Сотрудники полиции вышли на след 27-летнего пособника мошенников, который забрал сбережения у пожилого сибиряка.
📞 Как обманули жертву:
• 67-летнему мужчине позвонили под предлогом «проверки счетчиков» и выманили паспортные данные.
• Затем лжесотрудники «Госуслуг» и Росфинмониторинга напугали пенсионера обвинениями в «финансировании прест…
😡 Приехали! В Братском районе у людей окончательно отобрали право выбирать мэра!
Кажется, наше мнение чиновников больше вообще не интересует. Зачем спрашивать жителей, если можно всё тихо порешать в кабинетах?
Читайте подробности этой новости в канале Инцидент Макс - https://max.ru/incidentbratsk
🚨 В Братске сбили пешехода: полиция ищет очевидцев
31 октября, около 19:00 на ул. Комсомольской (в районе дома № 83) произошло ДТП.
📍 Что случилось:
47-летний водитель за рулём «Тойоты Карина» сбил мужчину, который переходил дорогу вне пешеходного перехода.
🏥 Последствия:
Пострадавший госпитализирован с травмами. Его личность сейчас устанавливается.
🔎 Нужна помощь!
Очевидцев ДТП или тех, кто знает личность постра…
В Братске снова взвинтили цены на бензин — теперь это еженедельный грабёж!
Выходные наступили — готовь кошелёк! У федеральной сети заправок появилась просто «замечательная» традиция: каждую неделю переписывать ценники.
С 1 ноября на федеральных АЗС очередное «обдиралово»:
⛽ АИ-92 — 68,00 руб. (+60 коп.)
⛽ АИ-95 — 71,70 руб. (+60 коп.)
⛽ АИ-100 — 100,30 руб. (пробил сотку!)
⛽ Дизель — 89,35 руб. (сразу +1,4 руб.)
📲…
⚠️ Медвежья угроза в России: от смертельных атак до появления опасных гибридов
Ситуация с хищниками в стране стремительно обостряется — как в текущей статистике, так и в эволюционном плане.
🩸 Кровавый рекорд в Приангарье
В Иркутской области зафиксирован беспрецедентный кризис: только в этом году от лап медведей погибли 8 человек, ещё 6 пострадали. Общественная палата региона экстренно решает вопрос о принудительном…
😨16🤬13😱2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @incidentbratsk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто должен оплачивать модернизацию изношенных тепловых сетей?
Потребители за счет повышения тарифов3%
Местный и региональный бюджеты18%
Федеральный бюджет36%
Меценаты3%
Компании, которые продают тепловую энергию64%
Другой вариант в комментариях1%
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Народные Новости Братска N.E.T @narodnieNETnovosti · 90 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Инцидент Братск” (@incidentbratsk), 20,226 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/incidentbratsk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.