Телега скоро rip🪦 🙈 Заходите в настройки и подключите ключи доступа, чтоб не потерять вход😉✊ Благодарите☺️👌🏼
💯8

Channel
@incablog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
231subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001622762103 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @incablog |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/incablog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 231 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 231 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
294 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 111 | 37.8% | |
| 🔥 | 103 | 35.0% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 10.2% | |
| 🥰 | 20 | 6.80% | |
| 🕊 | 16 | 5.44% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 2.72% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 1.70% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.34% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 294reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2025 to 19 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2025 to 19 December 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Телега скоро rip🪦 🙈 Заходите в настройки и подключите ключи доступа, чтоб не потерять вход😉✊ Благодарите☺️👌🏼
💯8
Когда ты эксперт, ты всегда готов 🚀😺👌🏼 даже если выступать надо в час ночи😹 на Международном бизнес форуме🔥 Надеюсь конечно замену найдут, ибо мне прийдется вести эфир шопотом🤞
❤25🔥24👍14
💥 Ну что, закончилась эта «Чёрная пятница»😱… А вы знали, что сама идея этих распродаж — вовсе не про скидки? 😏 🔹 Факт №1. Первая «Чёрная пятница» появилась в США после Дня благодарения — и вовсе не потому, что люди массово скупали товары. Название придумали полицейские — улицы чернели от толп, и город просто утопал в хаосе. 🔹 Факт №2. Большинство скидок — маркетинговая иллюзия. За пару недель до распродаж цены подн…
🔥19👍15❤9
Новый тренд в инстаграм* Сейчас такие фоточки продают за 200-500р😹😺 Хочешь сделать ее бесплатно? ДЕЛЮСЬ! Лови промт в коментах 👇👇👇 Ну и не забудь поблагодарить🥰👏 У меня тут всё про маркетинг и продвижение https://t.me/incablog *ск всё ещё запрещенная сеть🫠
❤21🔥18🕊16
🌍 Илон Маск строит новый остров — и это не шутка. Сначала — ракеты. Потом — электромобили. Теперь — первое независимое технологическое государство. Да, ты не ослышалась: Илон Маск объявил о запуске «эксперимента в реальном времени» — автономного острова, где люди будут жить по законам эффективности, логики и ответственности. Без партий, без бюрократии, без лозунгов. 💬 Маск сказал: «Мы пробуем построить общество, гд…
🥰20❤6🔥4
Соцсети и мессенджеры сегодня заполнили скрины и обсуждения о том, что операторы связи якобы блокируют регистрацию новых пользователей в Telegram и WhatsApp. 😱 Также сообщается, что уже зарегистрированные пользователи не могут установить эти приложения на другие устройства.👀 На данный момент коды подтверждения действительно не приходят абонентам оператора Билайн. Однако официальных заявлений от операторов связи или …
🔥21❤9
VK заблокировали в Беларуси. Решение было принято КГБ страны. Опа… вот те на👀
🔥10👀5
Тренд, который набирает большие просмотры 😃🔥 «УЗКИЙ РИЛС» 👇👇👇 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DO_LVrXDKfw/?igsh=YTE0bHd4MjJjZmo0 Нам нужен размер кадирования 5120 X 1080 Как ПОВТОРИТЬ: - Загружаем видео в СapСut - Через кнопку "наложение" добавляем РАМКУ (которую прикреплю в комментарий👉). - Через «склейку» убираем черный фон рамки, чтоб остались только прямоугольник с линиями. - Сохраняем ролик - Заходим в альбом…
❤15
Кто успел, тот получил😎 🔥 Мы поговорили про: 👉- Продвижения в инстаграм, как получать клиентов и подписчиков, 👉-Какой контент снимать, чтоб вовлекать аудиторию, 👉- Какие воронки работают и как собирать аудиторию. Не пропускайте такие эфиры🤗они бывают спонтанно, но запланированно👌🏼
❤9
Video message, posted without a caption
Live stream started
🟠📹📹📹📹📹📹! Когда: 😈🤠😡😒🥲 🫶👮♀️ 😈😡😬😺🫵🥵🤠🫵 в 1️⃣🫶:🫶🫶(Мск) Я проведу ✍✍ ваших профилей instagram. Здесь на канале https://t.me/incablog На эфире я: 👉Разберу профили участников в прямом эфире 👉Покажу, где теряется внимание и доверие 👉Дам конкретные рекомендации: что переписать, что удалить, что изменить 👉Расскажу, как превратить профиль в систему, которая генерит заявки и работает на тебя 🔴Хочешь чтобы разобрали именно…
🔥4❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @incablog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 752,511 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИНСАйТЫ / запуски / маркетинг / бизнес” (@incablog), 231 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/incablog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.