5 measurements spanning 24 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 917–932 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 07:34
919
-2
24 Aug 2026, 04:56
921
-3
16 Aug 2026, 02:35
924
-6
8 Aug 2026, 00:51
930
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:29
930
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 29 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
148 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5224320664629971994
71
48.0%
❤
26
17.6%
custom 5222190631434096746
17
11.5%
custom 5222064307855986200
10
6.76%
😢
7
4.73%
💔
6
4.05%
custom 5224592686383663198
5
3.38%
🔥
4
2.70%
🕊
2
1.35%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 22 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @inc_lementia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 March 2026 to 22 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Oh, hi Midj!
Glad to be back... wait a second...
Очередное напоминание всем, что оплачивать годовые подписки не надо. Они того не стоят
Помянем 😭 ждала подставы от хиггса, а прилетел ножик в спину от миджа
Спасибо на том, что доступ к ассетам оставили
❤❤ Обновление
❤❤Prompt Builder
Пора бы уж сделать оф релиз, а то мне все кажется, что можно сделать больше
фича намбер 1: Конструктор Grid промптов - инструмент для создания 2х2 сеток.
▫️ больше 55 пресетов для фоток: от селфи и close-ups до концептуальных и backstage фоток
▫️ интеграция с моим гайдом 70+ поз и ракурсов, чтобы вы могли генерить еще и разные позы
▫️ экономия ваших кредитов (вы ваще видели сколько …
давайте сделаем вид, что я не пропадала на 2 недели 🤩
держите красивую картинку 🩶
инсайты этих 2 недель:
GPT image 2 огонь 🩶
Claude заставляет меня переосмыслять свою жизнь и карьеру 🌸
Если общаться с ии по 8 часов в день, можно начать сходить с ума 🌸
а как ваши дела?
как вам такая раскадровка из 1 визуала, сделанная меньше чем за минуту?🌸
Сегодня релизнула еще 18 пресетов для нового инструмента на своем сайте. И они просто 🤩
Доделываю озвучку мини-туториала, но я постаралась сделать максимально понятный интерфейс и инструкции для GRID-BUILDER 🩶
уже пробовали? какие кадры вы обычно делаете для своих раскадровок? 🤩
Лайк 🩶, чтобы я быстрее закончила озвучку! она мне дается обычн…
Продолжаю разбирать ваши вопросы 🌟
как ты понимаешь, что нужно исправить в генерации? у меня в генерациях все выглядит вроде нормально, но вау эффекта при этом нет
ВСЕ фотографы вам скажут, что они знают, как будет выглядеть финальный кадр еще на этапе съемки. У меня с генерациями примерно такая же история. Когда я делаю серию или отдельные визуалы, у меня в голове уже есть представление о том, какие они должны быть…
Вчера была внезапная кодинг сессия, которая началась с простого «а что если...», и это значит, что в билдере появилась новая фича 🙃
Подробнее расскажу в следующем Release Notes, ну а пока... вы знаете, где искать 🌸
◾️◾️◾️Midjourney Profiles
для ваших бьюти кампейнов
разной степени реалистичности
Мой любимый сразу видно 🤩 Но остальные я собирала по всему миджу несколько месяцев — грех с вами не поделиться 🩶
Промпт всех визуалов из поста (для чистоты эксперимента - без апскейлов и обработок):
hyper-realistic close-up portrait of a young woman, eyes half open with a sad expression, bleached bushy eyebrows, wet and glossy crimson…
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @inc_lementia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“INC_LEMENTIA • AI • НЕЙРОСЕТИ” (@inc_lementia), 919 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inc_lementia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.