Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52670596608541722544custom 52672382885440154504custom 52694970075500099251

Channel
@inaricdt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
103subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002478551113 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @inaricdt |
| Description | 風が導くままに、稲荷の名のもとへ… |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/inaricdt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 103 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 103 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (14 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,961 |
| Reactions total | 241 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
298 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5269497007550009925 | 58 | 19.5% | |
| custom 5267059660854172254 | 54 | 18.1% | |
| custom 5267238288544015450 | 40 | 13.4% | |
| custom 5267353896178719983 | 35 | 11.7% | |
| custom 5267027564563569373 | 29 | 9.73% | |
| custom 5303521107108722540 | 23 | 7.72% | |
| custom 5267047123844633873 | 21 | 7.05% | |
| custom 5816623451049301387 | 19 | 6.38% | |
| custom 5267295162500944490 | 15 | 5.03% | |
| custom 5814570967782920994 | 4 | 1.34% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 298reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52670596608541722544custom 52672382885440154504custom 52694970075500099251
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52670596608541722546custom 52673538961787199836custom 52670275645635693735custom 53035211071087225401
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52670471238446338735custom 52673538961787199835custom 52694970075500099255custom 53035211071087225401
Совсем скоро встретимся с вами на мероприятии SUPчемп 09.08.26г. Ждите нас под номерами: 📖блок 📖номер А также наша Ти выступает с командой Old Money: 📖Блок 📖📖 номер До встречи, ваши Инарьки! #events
custom 52673538961787199838custom 52670596608541722543custom 52694970075500099253custom 53035211071087225401
🍓: Инари, простите, но это продолжится #tiktok #Emi #meme
custom 526723828854401545010custom 52670596608541722542custom 52672951625009444902custom 52694970075500099252custom 52670471238446338731custom 58145709677829209941
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ ☺️☺️☺️ ☺️☺️☺️☺️ I-DLE 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #tiktok #Ikori
custom 52672382885440154508custom 52670275645635693734custom 52670596608541722544custom 53035211071087225401custom 58145709677829209941
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 💗💗🤍💗 💗💗 illit 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #tiktok #Emi
custom 581662345104930138713custom 52670596608541722547custom 52694970075500099257custom 53035211071087225401
😀 ✨✨✨✨✨✨ When I walk onto the stage, yeah, I got this ✨✨✨✨✨✨ #tiktok #Ikori
custom 52694970075500099257custom 52670596608541722545custom 52672951625009444903custom 52670471238446338731custom 53035211071087225401custom 58166234510493013871
Pov: готовимся к Ростову #meme #May #Ti #Emi #Ikori #Tony
custom 52670596608541722549custom 52672951625009444904custom 52694970075500099253custom 52672382885440154501custom 52673538961787199831
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ BIBI 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Ссылочка на ютуб Ссылочка на рутуб Лето, шум волн, горячий песок и музыка, под которую невозможно стоять на месте. Если вам понравился наш кавер, обязательно поддержите нас лайком, комментарием и подпиской — это очень мотивирует нас создавать новые проекты! 💛 Отдельное спасибо @never_Ann за съемку и @ikoriii за монтаж 🐚 До скорых встреч, ваши Инари…
custom 53035211071087225408custom 52673538961787199834custom 52672382885440154503custom 52670275645635693731custom 58145709677829209941
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ BIBI 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟BIBI - Ikori Release: 19.07 12:00 #BUMPA #Ikori
custom 52694970075500099259custom 53035211071087225406custom 52670596608541722543custom 52670471238446338731custom 52673538961787199831custom 58145709677829209941
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ BIBI 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟Back dancers - Antibrimza & Shanee from Molitia Release: 19.07 12:00 #BUMPA
custom 526949700755000992510custom 52670471238446338738custom 52672951625009444905custom 53035211071087225401
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @inaricdt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 144,308 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Inari | cdt 🎋” (@inaricdt), 103 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inaricdt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.