Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝗜𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗿 𝗙𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗻 💚

@in_frieden

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

329subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001676216636
TypeChannel
Username@in_frieden
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/in_frieden

Growth

3297 Aug 2026, 07:16 — 329 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:12 — 329 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:167 Aug 2026, 09:12
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 328–330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 09:12329no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:16329first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
75.1%
avg views ÷ 329 subscribers
Avg views / post
247
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.275%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (15 April 202631 July 2026)
Views total741
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
660.0%
👍220.0%
💯110.0%
😨110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 18:50 UTC54 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Geist über Materie Übersetzt von Augen auf Medien Analyse Quelle: Greg Reese — ⭐️Für mehr, folge diesem Kanal⭐️

👍1

25 Jul 2026, 20:02 UTC309 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Wie die Beamten zu Angestellten wurden" Schon mal überlegt, wieso man einen Archiv Seite löschen muss? https://www.bar.admin.ch/bar/de/home/service-publikationen/publikationen/geschichte-aktuell/wie-die-beamten-zu-angestellten-wurden.html Es muss SIE echt belasten, damit SIE die Wahrheit verstecken und löschen müssen. Früher wurde dies mit Bücherverbrennung gelöst, heute genügt eine Mausklick. Nur doof, dass es W

18 Jul 2026, 12:38 UTC378 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/rNu1MHxIgQs?is=RMgQtmjDJT5ORvz8 Rituelle Gewählt - die Zeiten der Ignoranz sind vorbei Ganzheitlich bedeutet, dass wir alles was ist anschauen und nicht mehr, weil es unangenehm ist, ausklammern. Öffne dein Herz, öffne dein Bewusstsein und lausche hin. Ein Grossteil unserer Entscheidungsträger, der sogenannten "Elite" ist schwerst traumatisiert. Willst du wirklich diesen Psychopathen deine Stimm

13 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC≈2,230 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Die Wahrheit klingt manchmal wie ein Witz... 🤔 Quelle: SRF Meteo vom 11.07.2026 #Geoengineering Innerer Frieden ❤️ Frieden beginnt in Dir ✨

😨1

10 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTC194 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Was, wenn Mangel gar nicht die Wahrheit ist, sondern nur ein altes Programm? In unserem neuen stillen Gespräch sprechen Barbara und ich über wahre Energie, künstlichen Mangel und die Rückverbindung mit dem, was wir in Wahrheit sind. https://youtu.be/0SO4cq16Ki0

1

9 Jun 2026, 06:13 UTC295 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Es ist eine der schwierigsten Aufgaben überhaupt, den Glauben an den „Retter von außen“ zu überwinden. Die Hoffnung, dass irgendwann jemand kommt, der alles richtet, ist tief im Menschen verankert aber sie ist eine Illusion. Kein Politiker, keine Partei, kein Messias, kein anonymer Insider, kein außerirdischer Besucher und kein Superheld wird erscheinen, um Verantwortung für unser Leben zu übernehmen. Wer auf Erlösu

💯1

6 Jun 2026, 18:48 UTC190 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Alles beruht auf dem Sektenglauben "der Staat" #ReGierung #Etaisten https://t.me/pharaonenshow

3 Jun 2026, 18:04 UTC184 viewsread 7 August 2026

Wer bist du eigentlich, wenn du aufhörst, die Erwartungen anderer zu erfüllen und einfach nur atmest? In der neuen Folge von Stille Gespräche legen wir gemeinsam die Masken der Anpassung ab und finden den Mut, wieder ganz wir selbst zu sein. https://youtu.be/dXiBNYA7SZc

1 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC166 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

Die verborgene Geschichte des Bösen - Eine Reise durch esoterische Wahrheiten https://youtu.be/bdZI23WMoKA?is=HuPkDKwx7KkaJqbp In dieser provokanten Vorlesung enthüllt Prof. Jiang Xueqin eine esoterische Theologie geheimer Zirkel und erklärt, warum manche Strömungen glauben, dass Jahwe ein „falscher Gott“ sei und die globale Elite von den Nephilim abstamme. 🌍 Die drei Phasen der Religion: Von der Muttergöttin (Zen

17 May 2026, 19:21 UTC204 viewsread 7 August 2026

Denkst du wirklich selbst – oder wurdest du gedacht? In der neuen Folge spreche ich darüber, warum fast alles, was wir für unsere eigene Meinung halten, nur ein übernommenes Programm ist, und warum echte Freiheit nicht mit einer neuen Überzeugung beginnt, sondern mit dem Mut, die alte loszulassen. https://youtu.be/R9ZLREszREo

12 May 2026, 07:14 UTC192 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gemeinsamimwandelPhoto

💞 Spontan gemeinsam wachsen 💞 Partnerschaft heisst: ganz bei sich sein und sich dem anderen wirklich zeigen. 🌿 Manchmal gelingt das ganz leicht – und manchmal fühlen wir uns trotz Liebe getrennt, missverstanden oder verletzt. Unsere Auszeit für Paare im Tessin über Pfingsten vom 22.–25. Mai lädt euch ein, genau hier hinzuschauen: ✨ Muster und Blockaden erkennen ✨ Verletzungen heilen und neue Wege im Miteinander fin

1

3 May 2026, 19:23 UTC263 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

👹 „Der Teufel steckt im Detail" – jeder kennt diesen Satz. Aber was, wenn er viel tiefer geht, als wir denken? Was, wenn das „Teuflische" tatsächlich im Detail steckt – im Zerteilen, im Zerlegen, im Aufspalten der Wirklichkeit in immer kleinere Teile, bis wir das Ganze nicht mehr sehen? Das Böse ist kein roter Mann mit Hörnern – es ist ein Prinzip, und dieses Prinzip heisst Trennung: von dir selbst, von anderen, vom

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @in_frieden. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 423,849 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗜𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗿 𝗙𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗻 💚” (@in_frieden), 329 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/in_frieden.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.