Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IMI

Channel

IMI

@impuls_tibbiyot_instituti

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

-484 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001960487061
TypeChannel
Username@impuls_tibbiyot_instituti
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/impuls_tibbiyot_instituti

Growth

148524324 August 2026 — 485 subscribers25 August 2026 — 484 subscribers10 September 2026 — 481 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1 subscribers24 August 202618 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 25 days, net -484. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:391-480
10 Sept 2026, 07:17481-3
25 Aug 2026, 00:32484-1
24 Aug 2026, 09:15485first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

354 reactions across 19 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣8423.7%
😁6217.5%
3710.5%
🔥257.06%
👍246.78%
💯215.93%
👏205.65%
🏆154.24%
❤‍🔥143.95%
💔82.26%
61.69%
🕊51.41%
😎51.41%
🤔51.41%
🆒41.13%
🙊41.13%
🎉30.847%
😭30.847%
🍾20.565%
💊20.565%
4 further kinds51.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 354 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC320 views7 reactionsread 24 August 2026
File

4-kurs yangi guruhlar ro'yxati e'lon qilinmoqda. *Guruhda jami 12 nafar bo'ladi undan oshirilmaydi. *4-kurslar hisob bo'yicha 32 ta guurh bo'ladi 16 tasi ertalbki smena qolgani ikkinchi *Qaysi guurh qaysi smenada ekannini jadval chiqgandan keyin aniq bo'ladi *Kursda qolganlar yangi kursga o'tsa yangi guruh tashkil etiladi.

🔥31❤‍🔥1🎉1👍1

11 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC519 views6 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥211👏1🤔1

10 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC420 views29 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Yoki savollar o'zbek tilida yuborilsa qulaymi kursdoshlar? Barchaga foydali bo‘ladi, random medical factlarni passive takrorlab turamiz. O'zbekcha 👍 English ❤️

👍195🏆2❤‍🔥1👏1🕊1

10 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC383 views3 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Poll

A portion of the arch of the aorta is derived from which of the following?

  1. Aortic arch 111%
  2. Aortic arch 438%
  3. Aortic arch 319%
  4. Aortic arch 211%
  5. Aortic arch 622%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1🔥1🕊1

Signed 𝓜𝓾𝓱𝓪𝓶𝓶𝓪𝓭 𝓜𝓪'𝓻𝓾𝓯

10 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC383 views5 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Poll

Which of the following events is involved in the cleavage of the zygote during week 1 of development?

  1. A series of meiotic divisions forming blastomeres19%
  2. An increase in size of blastomeres19%
  3. A decrease in size of blastomeres27%
  4. An increased cytoplasmic content of blastomeres16%
  5. Production of highly differentiated blastomeres19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1👍1👏1💊1🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC641 views15 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Ha azizlar, AI dan g'arazli maqsadda foydalanuvchi odamlar ham uchrab turadi...

🤣7💯2🔥2😁21😭1

24 Jul 2026, 03:49 UTC760 views26 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Tinchgina : "Yo'qotib qo'ydim" desammikan... - Tayyor belgilangan High Yeald ma'lumotlar, qisqartmalar, mnemonik suratlar...Kelgusi avlod ular yordamida mavzuni yanada osonroq o'zlashtirishi mumkin, to'g'rimi? Lekin kutubxonachi opa negadir ishonmayapti... - @impuls_tibbiyot_instituti

😁11💯4💔32😭2🔥1😢1🙊1

19 Jul 2026, 17:06 UTC733 views18 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Poll

Bugun 00:00 da JCH finalini ko‘rasizmi?

  1. Bo‘lmasamchi ! | Albatta47%
  2. Yo'q | Uxlayman53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁8💯32🏆1👏1💔1🤝1🤣1

17 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC797 views28 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

#meme - Kimda RedMi bor, bu pult tushmayapti? - @impuls_tibbiyot_instituti

🤣17😁52🌚1🔥1😎1🆒1

17 Jul 2026, 04:55 UTC662 views31 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

#tadqiqot - Agar shifokor savolni to'g'ri bersa, bemor hammasini o'zi aytib beradi. - @impuls_tibbiyot_instituti

😁12🤣9💯4🏆21🤯1😎1🙊1

11 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC666 views32 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @yuzaysuf

Qiladigan ishlarimizda o'zimizni emas, avvalo boshqalarning foydasini ko'zlab harakat qilsak, oqibati go'zalroq bo'ladi. Imtixonlar uchun emas, ummatning sog'lig'i uchun o'qisak – o'qiganlarimiz esimizda yaxshiroq qoladi. Faqatgina o'zimiz uchun juft emas, bo'lajak farzandlarimiz uchun munosib ona qidirsak – qurilajak oilamiz baxtliroq bo‘ladi. Maqsad qanchalik "men"dan uzoqlashib, "biz"ga yaqinlashsa erishadiganl

11👏5🔥53❤‍🔥2🤔2🍾1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @impuls_tibbiyot_instituti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTCAnonymous Quiz37 voters

A portion of the arch of the aorta is derived from which of the following?

  1. Aortic arch 111%
  2. Aortic arch 438%
  3. Aortic arch 319%
  4. Aortic arch 211%
  5. Aortic arch 622%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz37 voters

Which of the following events is involved in the cleavage of the zygote during week 1 of development?

  1. A series of meiotic divisions forming blastomeres19%
  2. An increase in size of blastomeres19%
  3. A decrease in size of blastomeres27%
  4. An increased cytoplasmic content of blastomeres16%
  5. Production of highly differentiated blastomeres19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jul 2026, 17:06 UTCFinal Results100 voters

Bugun 00:00 da JCH finalini ko‘rasizmi?

  1. Bo‘lmasamchi ! | Albatta47%
  2. Yo'q | Uxlayman53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

English Connection Channel
@English_Connection · 52,793
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IMI” (@impuls_tibbiyot_instituti), 1 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/impuls_tibbiyot_instituti.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.