2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54–56 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 08:31
55
no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:46
55
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
145.5%
avg views ÷ 55 subscribers
Avg views / post
80.0
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
25.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
10 (28 July 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
800
Reactions total
201
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
19
Videos
8
Links
9
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
6m 30s
Average length
1m 18s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
201 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
89
44.3%
❤🔥
50
24.9%
🔥
37
18.4%
😁
10
4.98%
👍
9
4.48%
🥰
6
2.99%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
— О, ты же импровизатор! А можешь сказать что-то на импровизаторском?
— Да, и.
Ходят слухи, что импровизаторы не умеют говорить «нет». И причина тому – главное правило импровизации: «Да, и...». Оно учит не спорить с идеями напарника, а принимать их и развивать дальше. Именно так рождаются самые неожиданные, смешные и невероятные истории! ✨
Хочешь проверить? Мы начнём рассказывать историю, а ты продолжишь её в комме…
😎 Насколько ты бывалый импровизатор?
Сегодня мы предлагаем тебе выполнить наше особенное бинго под соусом профи. Пройдись по закоулкам памяти и отметь в нашей таблице совпавшее!✅
Как часто эти ситуации происходили с тобой? Партнёр придумал нестандартный сюжет похожий на Санта Барбару? Шёл на сцену без единой идеи для шутки?
Скорее заполняй бинго и наслаждайся заполненными ячейками, импровизатор!📱
#ТвойХод #Росмол…
Ты очнулся спустя 7 дней, но мы тебя не отпустили 🤗
Слышите писк пролетающего комара? А, подожди... Это один из наших импровизаторов кричит, что прошла целая неделя с региональных игр!
Да-да, ты не ослышался. Все было будто бы вчера: смеялись до упаду, переживали кому отдадут голос жюри, болели за любимчиков🧡
▶️ Давай вспомним, как это было...
#ТвойХод #Росмолодёжь #ТвойХод_ДНР #Импровизация
⚡️Мгновенный юмор: первый турнир импровизаторов в ДНР
Впервые в Республике прошёл турнир импровизаторов. В Доме молодёжи «30/09» состоялся региональный этап спецпроекта «Твой Ход х Импровизация».
Участники работали парами и на ходу придумывали убойный юмор. Чьи шутки зажгли зал и кто дошёл до финала — расскажет Сабина Ахназарова.
💬 ПРК в Макс
💬Реклама на телеканале +7949 555 75 75
🎁 Буст
✈️ Подписаться на канал
🫥 А у кого сегодня день рождения?
Кажется, у человека, который каким-то образом успевает быть победительницей первых региональных игр по импровизации, талантливым дизайнером, неиссякаемым источником креативных идей и настоящей звёздочкой нашей команды!
Даша, с праздником! 🥳
На сцене ты раз за разом доказываешь, что хорошая импровизация рождается не только из скорости мысли, но и из таланта замечать необычное в сам…
🤣 Шутки рождались быстрее, чем зрители успевали перевести дыхание!
Первые региональные игры по импровизации получились именно такими, какими и должны быть: громкие, смелые, непредсказуемые — они стали настоящим праздником юмора, которого все так ждали.
Участники выходили на сцену без сценария, но с абсолютной готовностью ловить любой поворот событий 🤩
Искромётные шутки, мгновенные решения, поддержка партнёров и то…
Сможешь придумать шутку за секунду?🤔
А донецкие импровизаторы умеют рассмешить за секунды и доказывают это на региональных играх от проекта «Твой Ход» 😁
Море юмора, яркие эмоции и приятные призы победителям — самые интересные моменты дня ищи в нашем ролике ⬆️
Мы во «ВКонтакте» 😁 Мы в МАХ ☺️
🙌 Школа импровизации покорена!
Наша команда посетила Летнюю школу импровизации от «Твой Ход» в Тамбове! С 20 по 24 июля мы проходили программу, где учились новому вместе с дружным сообществом молодых комиков!
На мастер-классах от экспертов раскрыли тайны черного юмора, прокачали навыки и повертелись в новых просторах для шуток, за что хотим поблагодарить:
➡️Мартина Разроева
➡️Евгению Гольц
➡️Вадима Попова
➡️Дениса …
🥹 Готов смеяться до упаду?
И мы полностью заряжены тебя смешить! Осталось всего 3 дня до Региональных игр по Импровизации!
На сцене дуэты, которые тренировались у лучших мастеров наших регионов. Не веришь? Приходи и убедись в этом сам!
✨Когда: 31 июля
✨Во сколько: 11:30
✨Где: узнаешь после регистрации
Сделай свой ход – регистрируйся по форме, чтобы стать нашим драгоценным зрителем! Мы тебя ждём!
До встречи на к…
❤🔥11🔥4👍3
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @improv_tx_dnr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 605,873 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Твой Ход х Импровизация ДНР” (@improv_tx_dnr), 55 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/improv_tx_dnr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.