Channel
@impfquisition
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
225subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001715462905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @impfquisition |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/impfquisition |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 225 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 224 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:09 | 224 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 23 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
28 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 21.4% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 3.57% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 3.57% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 3.57% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2025 to 31 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Pfizer-mRNA im Blut, in der Plazenta und im Sperma bis zu 251 Tage später nachgewiesen – unter Verwendung derselben forensischen Methode, mit der Mörder überführt werden. Eine atemberaubende neue, von Experten geprüfte (peer-reviewed) Studie hat soeben den bislang schlüssigsten Beweis geliefert und damit die langjährige Behauptung widerlegt, dass mRNA-Impfstoffe im Arm bleiben und innerhalb von Stunden abgebaut wer…
🍌1
🚨 Von der „HANTA“-Täuschung zur „EBOLA“-Hysterie! CDC GIBT ZU: Kein „Ebola-Virus“-Isolat vorhanden! ❌ Nach dem „Hantavirus“-Märchen öffnet sich der Vorhang für den nächsten Blockbuster der globalen Angstindustrie: 🍿🎬 „EBOLA“. 🦠 Die Medien gehorchen sofort brav: WHO ruft wegen Ebola internationalen Gesundheitsnotstand aus | tagesschau.de. Und wieder ein Zufall: Lange bevor die Medien überhaupt den Panik-Knopf gedr…
🚨⚠️ 💉⚠️🚨 JEDE IMPFSTOFFCHARGE HATTE EINE ANDERE ZUSAMMENSETZUNG. DIE CHARGENNUMMERN HABEN DAS GERADE BELEGT. Keine Theorie. Keine Interpretation. Ein Datensatz. 12.000 Chargennummern. Abgeglichen mit den VAERS-Meldungen zu unerwünschten Ereignissen. Der Zusammenhang ist eindeutig. Ein Forscherteam – bestehend aus 4 Statistikern, 2 Pharmakologen und 1 ehemaligen FDA-Beamten – veröffentlichte seine Ergebnisse am Mit…
🤔1
drizzt2000 @pathofdrizzt Hantavirus-Ausbruch: Akte X Staffel 7, Episode 12: „X-Cops“ (ausgestrahlt am 20. Februar 2000). Dasselbe Virus mit dem Namen, das auf diesem Schiff ist, über das die Nachrichten heute berichten. 10:23 nachm. · 6. Mai 2026 · 552 Mal angezeigt https://x.com/pathofdrizzt/status/2052122120008749076?s=20
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: "Vaccines are not safe." "Not one vaccine has ever been proven to be safe because they don't use true placebos, number one, and they don't follow them long enough to see. All they're looking for is, did it make you die? And if you didn't die, they call it safe." "They never talk about asthma, allergies, eczema, ADD, ADHD, the long list of neurological problems, the autoimmune diseases that take…
❤🔥1
DIE VIRUSLÜGE - WAS DIR DIE ÄRZTE IM WIDERSTAND VERSCHWEIGEN! Selbst von alternativen Shops wie dem AUF1-Shop wird dieses Buch boykottiert! Dieses Buch deckt eine der größten Lügen dieser Welt auf, die weder vom Mainstream noch von der alternativen Szene thematisiert wird. Die Viruslüge ist nicht nur eine Abrechnung mit der todbringenden Schulmedizin, sondern auch mit den Ärzten des Widerstands, die nach wie vor an…
Wir sind ohne Zweifel eine der Dümmsten Spezies https://t.me/impfquisition
👏2🖕1
VIRENLÜGE RUNDUM ERKLÄRT UND BLOSSGESTELLT - DR. LANKA MIT HÖRSTEL UND DR. KAHLER 2021-3-2
Es gibt keine Viren kleine Version
Wart ihr mit eurer Impfung zufrieden? Und drunter: Fälle von Herzerkrankungen nach Impfung! Sowas kannste dir nicht ausdenken... qualitativer Journalismus im Suizidmodus 🤣🤣😅🤦🏼♂️
🤣2
äääähm okey 🥴😆
🤬2😁2🖕1🙈1
Die Ärztin Bettina Komm spricht leise und hochkonzentriert — manchmal ringt sie um Worte, manchmal kämpft sie beim Erzählen ihrer persönlichen Geschichte mit den Tränen. Sie erzählt die Geschichte einer Frau, die als Medizinerin dem öffentlichen Narrativ vertraute, selbst schwer erkrankte und heute tiefes Bedauern verspürt. Sie berichtet im Gespräch mit Johannes Clasen offen über ihren langen Leidensweg, ihre Arbeit …
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @impfquisition. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 608,740 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@impfquisition named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Warum ALLE Impfungen schädlich sind!” (@impfquisition), 225 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/impfquisition.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.