Channel
@impertations
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
108subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003936467860 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @impertations |
| Description | начало-24.05.26 находимся под крылом у @Fairytalequests |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 24 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/impertations |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 108 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 108 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 109 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
76 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5278590595776926800 | 22 | 28.9% | |
| custom 5278354488539767182 | 19 | 25.0% | |
| custom 5280917639122671558 | 17 | 22.4% | |
| custom 5278432974772132539 | 10 | 13.2% | |
| custom 5280919292685081491 | 8 | 10.5% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 14 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Здравствуйте! Этот бот @Help_in_SP_bot создан для помощи в сфере страшных переписок. Тут вы можете: — Попросить совет; — Мы можем дать совет по развитию канала; — Также дать идеи для написания квестов; — Мы можем дать идеи для оформления, так же мы можем оформить ваш канал. И многие другие вещи. Если вы новичок в этой сфере, то когда набьёте 10+ подписчиков, мы вам скинем ссылку на наш чат владельцев.
Signed #eshkka
мы с сегодняшнего дня состоим в ордене @orden_feniksa0
Signed #eshkka
поздравляю!! желаю всего самого наилучшего
custom 52783544885397671821
Signed #eshkka
поддерживаю, такие ситуации сейчас стали довольно частыми
Signed #eshkka
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Cinematic portrait, mystical ethereal goddess aesthetic, wearing an intricate floral crown with hanging crystal chains and pearls, delicate vintage-style lace dress with puffed sleeves, dramatic moody lighting, rim lighting effect, warm glowing golden hour light, deep dark background, high contrast, elegant jewelry, mysterious atmosphere, artistic photography, high detail, masterpiece.
custom 52809192926850814914custom 52783544885397671822custom 52785905957769268002custom 52784329747721325391custom 52809176391226715581
Signed #eshkka
доп у них, ок да
Signed #eshkka
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 this must be love book clap the sound of my heart the beat goes oh and on and on and on and boom clap you make me feel good come on to me come on to me nod сегодня заключаем союз между @impertations и @Sweetblood_quests
Signed #eshkka
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 #пара Cinematic close-up portrait of a young couple, dramatic low-key lighting, moody atmosphere, soft rim light highlighting their silhouettes against a pitch-black background, high-end editorial photography style, sharp focus on facial features, shallow depth of field, sophisticated and intense expression, professional studio lighting, shot on 85mm lens, minimalist aesthetic, elegant composition, film grain …
custom 52783544885397671821custom 52784329747721325391
Signed #eshkka
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Cinematic photography of a person in a vintage gothic style. They are wearing an elaborate historical gown with intricate lace details and a delicate lace veil draped over their head. The setting is a dimly lit, moody interior resembling a Victorian mansion, illuminated by warm candlelight from a candlestick held in hand and a nearby chandelier. Rich shadows, dramatic chiaroscuro lighting, dark aesthetic, refi…
Signed #eshkka
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 A cinematic full-shot of a person kneeling in the snow at night in front of a rustic, dimly lit chapel in a pine forest. The person is dressed in an intricate lace wedding corset dress and a long veil with a floral crown. They are positioned in the center of a circle of many lit candles placed directly in the snow. They are holding a glass of wine in one hand and a lit candle in the other. In front of them lie…
custom 52783544885397671822custom 52784329747721325391custom 52809176391226715581
Signed #eshkka
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Cinematic close-up portrait of an angelic figure, wearing a white strapless top and layered pearl necklaces with a silver cross pendant. The character has a whimsical, delicate appearance, decorated with adhesive bandages on the face and shoulder, and faint traces of small scratches. Large, soft white wings are visible behind the back. One hand holds a single large white feather. Fallen feathers are floating i…
custom 52785905957769268002custom 52783544885397671821custom 52809176391226715581custom 52809192926850814911
Signed #eshkka
на что вы хотите туториал в айлайте?
Signed #eshkka
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @impertations. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 990,097 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ꫀ𝘴ꫝ𝓲” (@impertations), 108 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/impertations.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.