Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

👑帝国日报 Imperial Daily

@imperialdaily

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

117subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002036098197
TypeChannel
Username@imperialdaily
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/imperialdaily

Growth

117118117.58 August 2026 — 118 subscribers9 August 2026 — 118 subscribers15 August 2026 — 117 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 117–118 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:44117-1
9 Aug 2026, 04:48118no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:15118first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2024 to 27 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2025, 06:42 UTC73 viewsread 9 August 2026

🔥川普限俄50天内停火 中共备感压力?天水铅中毒事件发酵 更多真相曝光;中国外卖大战: 狂欢背后的悲哀;中共发审判工作意见 专家:加强独裁专制;中共公安部抛民企反腐案例 律师揭内幕。 #中国禁闻 🌈https://cn.ntdtv.com/gb/2025/07/15/a104003675.html 传递真实资讯 关注热点事件 👏欢迎您加入 @mingbai12🎄

26 Aug 2025, 06:42 UTC52 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

1. 请问你认为政府的角色是什么? 政府不是统治者,而是服务者。它的存在应当保障人民的基本权利与尊严——包括言论自由、人身安全、司法公正和公平参与社会的权利。政府若脱离了民意,便失去了其存在的正当性。 2. 你这一生全力追求的是什么? 我追求的,是“真实地活着”。这包括知识上的诚实、道德上的自由、行动上的独立,以及在纷繁世界中坚持初心的勇气。如果必须选一个关键词,那就是“尊严”——它高于刺激、权力,也优于成就。 3. 你认为是否存在绝对真理? 在人类层面,很难掌握“绝对真理”,但我们应持续追求它。真理也许永远无法彻底获得,但我们拒绝谎言、追问权力背后的逻辑,本身就是对真理的致敬。 10. 请问你想要成为国家的总统吗?为什么?如果你知道当你离职后全国四分之一的人会鄙视你,你还想当吗? 总统是责任,而不是荣誉。如果我能通过领导实现制度的转型、保障人权、推动社会开放,即便有一半人反对我,我也会愿意承担。领导者不是要取悦所有人,而

1

18 Jul 2025, 06:53 UTC96 viewsread 9 August 2026

我们每天经历的所谓日常,就是持续不断发生着的奇迹 我非常能理解这种“想要一个活着的理由”的感受,这种对理由的“欲望”实际上来自于“无意义感”,曾经看到这样一封自杀信,挺有感触,这个世界确实一如既往的荒谬: “有一群快乐的愚人在工作。他们在一块开阔地上搬运砖头。砖头在一边垒好之后,他们再把这些砖头运到另一边去。就这样,他们年复一年、日复一日地从事着同样的工作,从无停顿。一天,一个愚人停下来足够长的时间,让他可以问自己,我在做什么。他想知道搬砖头的目的是什么。从这一刻起,他再也不能满足于以前做的事情。 而我,就是那个想知道自己为什么要搬砖头的愚人。” 而不止是这位自杀者,其实很多思考者,包括托尔斯泰,加缪等等都有这样的感觉 在现代之后,我们开始发问:世界,真的有意义么? 托尔斯泰在五十岁的时候走向了自杀的边缘,当时他不断的逼问自己:为什么要管理财产?为什么要教育儿子?“这有什么用?我现在在萨马拉省有

17 Jul 2025, 02:57 UTC49 viewsread 9 August 2026

🔥面對俄國軍事壓力 德國大擴軍狂買數千戰車 歐洲未來坦克或泡湯 #德國陸軍 #豹2A8 #豹2坦克 #KF51 #無人機 #萊茵金屬 #拳師犬裝甲車 #軍事 | 07/16 馬克時空 完整影片👉🏻 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GkRkftv278&list=PLzsebW6nzgBwsrGEenHtxBDj3qBCyrDeE

17 Jul 2025, 02:56 UTC47 viewsread 9 August 2026

7月9日,一名博主拍下老爸的手机的聊天记录,可以清晰的看见,爸爸在付出辛苦劳动后还要哀求老板结清工资。 https://t.co/SfL0WPydHy 👤 whyyoutouzhele 🔗 原始视频链接

17 Jul 2025, 02:54 UTC51 viewsread 9 August 2026

彭斯呼吁特朗普政府促中国出售TikTok或关闭 前美国副总统迈克·彭斯敦促特朗普政府要求中国出售TikTok或关闭该应用。据CBS News报道,彭斯此举引发人们对TikTok数据安全的担忧。该事件正在引起广泛关注。 📎 原文链接 📤 来源:CBS News

17 Jul 2025, 02:53 UTC53 viewsread 9 August 2026

#台风普拉桑##暴雨##台风追击# 普拉桑凭一己之力搅动中日韩三国天气。就在日本能登半岛相继遭遇特大暴雨的同时,韩国南部也被“复活”后的普拉桑正面袭击,釜山市区今天24小时降雨300~380毫米、加德岛高达407.5毫米,全市多处出现内涝、山体滑坡等险情。 source

28 Sept 2024, 01:22 UTC209 viewsread 9 August 2026

世界反兴奋剂机构在巴黎奥运会前因数据问题发出警报,文件和采访显示。 https://inty.news/2024/09/27/45082/

10 Sept 2024, 10:40 UTC204 viewsread 9 August 2026

秦剛還活著?美媒揭內幕!美總統辯論前瞻、賀錦麗、川普民調差1%!中共網絡管控、黑手伸到香港澳門!美警告伊朗援俄、澤連斯基呼籲交付武器! 立即觀看👉🏻 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6U-9i_Txrj0&list=PLaF6XA2KQtwQiBH0iX30Lqj8lIZS_eYjh

10 Sept 2024, 07:10 UTC142 viewsread 9 August 2026

🔥吳國光親身經歷;文革釀中國鄉下人的悲歌;隨父母被勞改、下放到農村;親眼見到被逼還俗的和尚;他呼籲知識分子,做一件事! 觀看首播👇🏻 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlBiHs_vgLk&list=PLaF6XA2KQtwTIO-iDc7qLGGcyXcf9WVnU

9 Sept 2024, 01:03 UTC103 viewsread 9 August 2026

特斯拉据报道计划在中国推出一款可坐六人的 Y 型车型。 https://inty.news/2024/09/08/43740/

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @imperialdaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 795,982 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“👑帝国日报 Imperial Daily” (@imperialdaily), 117 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imperialdaily.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.