Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Impact Team

@impactteamcs2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

204subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002567803285
TypeChannel
Username@impactteamcs2
DescriptionКиберспортивная команда по CS 2 Владелец организации @sanya_23100 Второй менеджер @StegopS
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/impactteamcs2

Growth

20410 Aug 2026, 18:17 — 204 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 18:30 — 204 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 18:1710 Aug 2026, 18:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 203–205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 18:30204no change
10 Aug 2026, 18:17204first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 12 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
270
Videos
5
Links
70

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3186.1%
😱38.33%
😭25.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @impactteamcs2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 March 2026 to 21 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Apr 2026, 09:20 UTC191 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Esea entry 5 матч победа против португальцев Barraco Счет в регулярке 4-1 4✅ 1🔻

5

15 Apr 2026, 19:51 UTC233 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Esea entry 4 матч победа против Unity Счет в регулярке 3-1 3✅ 1🔻

3😱1

13 Apr 2026, 19:27 UTC201 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ESEA entry 3 матч победа против Galaxy E-Sports Счет 2-1 в регулярке 2✅ 1🔻

6😱1

26 Mar 2026, 10:13 UTC230 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @quap1xlifePhoto

📰📰📰 - И так, вот и все, подходит к концу наша хорошая история, эти 5 дней были лучшие для меня. Незабываемый опыт, менеджмент, турнир стал частью меня, и буду продолжать их делать. А мы обьевляем наших победителей АДСКОЙ и РАЙСКОЙ ЛИГИ!!!! И ТАК.. - 🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁 😇 - Победители Райской лиги становится: Wertical team, огромное спасибо вам парни за участие, показали очень сильную и интересную игру, подсады это ваша фишка. 😈

3

19 Mar 2026, 09:42 UTC204 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @retakenewsPhoto

😭 Из-за обновы КС потеряет зрелищность — считает аналитик Спирит. Он думает, что теперь на про-сцене будет меньше жёстких прострелов через текстуры и нашивов в смоки. Экономим патроны 😒

3😱1

17 Mar 2026, 14:45 UTC178 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @tiernewshundreadPhoto

🔥 INTERNAL LEAGUE — РАУНД 1 ЗАВЕРШЕН 🔥 📊 Текущий рейтинг — смотри на картинке 📺 Следи за матчами в прямом эфире: Twitch — internal_league_off 📲 Все новости и обновления: https://t.me/tiernewshundread

15 Mar 2026, 19:50 UTC170 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @MLT_CS2Photo

Ну вот и чемпионы турнира MLT CUP определены! Наконец-то мы узнали имя победителя, и им становится команда Impact Team! Поздравляем ребят с заслуженной победой! Наши партнеры : 1xBet, GUTS NEWS и Korvex Наш сайт где вы найдете подробную информацию о своей команде - КЛИК

2

15 Mar 2026, 19:43 UTC123 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @mdkleaguePhoto

Сетка play-off ✅

1

15 Mar 2026, 16:28 UTC122 views2 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @MLT_CS2Photo

И чемпионами турнира становятся .... Impact Team 2:1 WLS Трансляция Наши партнеры : 1xBet, GUTS NEWS и Korvex Наш сайт где вы найдете подробную информацию о своей команде - КЛИК

2

15 Mar 2026, 15:04 UTC117 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @MLT_CS2Photo

Первая карта за Impact Team Impact Team 1:0 WLS Трансляция Наши партнеры : 1xBet, GUTS NEWS и Korvex Наш сайт где вы найдете подробную информацию о своей команде - КЛИК

1

15 Mar 2026, 13:32 UTC108 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @MLT_CS2Photo

Карты на финальный матч известны . Напоминаем матч стартует в 17:00 по МСК Наши партнеры : 1xBet, GUTS NEWS и Korvex Наш сайт где вы найдете подробную информацию о своей команде - КЛИК

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @impactteamcs2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Mar 2026, 12:18 UTCAnonymous Poll60 voters

Кто победит в финале MLT CUP ?

  1. Impact Tesm77%
  2. WLS23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 21 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 310,559 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Impact Team” (@impactteamcs2), 204 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/impactteamcs2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.