Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

сам не пон че высрал

@impactofcrypto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

258subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001700715621
TypeChannel
Username@impactofcrypto
Descriptionadmin: @lastingimpact
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/impactofcrypto

Growth

2587 Aug 2026, 13:09 — 258 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:17 — 258 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:098 Aug 2026, 09:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 257–259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:17258no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:09258first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
126
Videos
14
Links
39

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2843.1%
2030.8%
🤝1116.9%
👍69.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2025 to 7 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @impactofcrypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 October 2025 to 7 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 May 2026, 18:20 UTC406 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed wraith // IN $POLY WE TRUST

29 Jan 2026, 14:04 UTC688 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

5👍1😁1

Signed wraith // IN $POLY WE TRUST

29 Jan 2026, 10:11 UTC665 views4 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мы окончательно потеряли Сорика.

2👍1🤝1

Signed wraith // IN $POLY WE TRUST

25 Dec 2025, 15:00 UTC722 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

3👍2😁2

Signed wraith // IN $POLY WE TRUST

30 Nov 2025, 17:07 UTC728 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Смотрю со своими кентами, вот они слева направо:

4🤝3😁3

Signed wraith // IN $POLY WE TRUST

29 Nov 2025, 15:59 UTC641 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

по рефке никто не перешел, потому что все уже пользуются Prosto Exchange, ведь так?

2🤝2

Signed wraith // IN $POLY WE TRUST

29 Nov 2025, 15:59 UTC594 views3 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤝3

Signed wraith // IN $POLY WE TRUST

26 Nov 2025, 15:22 UTC536 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

НУ И НАХУЙ ВЫ МНЕ НУЖНЫ, 1 ЧЕЛОВЕК ПРИШЕЛ И ТО, МОЙ ВТОРОЙ АККАУНТ

😁92👍2

Signed wraith // IN $POLY WE TRUST

25 Nov 2025, 22:52 UTC472 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

t.me/prostoexbot?start=668557410 используйте. лучший обменник. никаких 115 и 161 фз.

😁52🤝2

Signed wraith // IN $POLY WE TRUST

24 Nov 2025, 17:26 UTC443 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Володь, ну ты чего, какие ласт бабки в драфтед

Signed wraith // IN $POLY WE TRUST

20 Nov 2025, 14:52 UTC518 viewsread 8 August 2026

Привет, у меня есть канал с разбором монет и анализом рынка, в стиле персонажа (гусь с пламенем и фиолетовым вайбом) Создаём "шиллинг" с другими каналами. (Это когда каждый рекламирует друг друга.) Я напишу пост вроде 'Рекомендую подписаться на https://t.me/minikcrypto, https://t.me/aloaloprofiti, https://t.me/crypterbueno, https://t.me/addicted_crypto https://t.me/ch1ief @seemefall228"— с твоей ссылкой среди них.

Signed wraith // IN $POLY WE TRUST

24 Oct 2025, 14:22 UTC547 viewsread 8 August 2026

гайдик на полимаркет дайте да

Signed wraith | voenkomat arc

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @impactofcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“сам не пон че высрал” (@impactofcrypto), 258 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/impactofcrypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.