Channel
@immortalistdark
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002821641378 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @immortalistdark |
| Created | 5 July 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/immortalistdark |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 6 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 6 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 5 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
10 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 7 | 70.0% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2025 to 31 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://x.com/drklly/status/2054607318457975055 Это странное чувство, когда ты имморталист с 10-20-30 летним стажем, один из 250 участников чата виталистов, но вот ребята работают в топовых лабах и компаниях, над самыми интересными, полезными и важными задачами, в компании умнейших способнейших людей, и получая заслуженные $200к+/год, а ты нет и в общем не потому, что не хочешь надеюсь, это за сколько-то лет испра…
Photo, posted without a caption
😁2🤣1🤪1
Идея #87 Стена Присяги Проблема: сновная проблема заключается в низкой устойчивости и долгосрочной приверженности людей целям радикального долголетия, что вызвано отсутствием мгновенных результатов, недостаточной социальной поддержкой и слабостью сформированного сообщества Идея: Организовать проведение обряд инициации для начинающих имморталистов на специальной локации (например, у "стены"). Обряд должен включать ф…
😁3
Найдена самая большая проблема в трансгуманизме. Золотая жила!
😁2
Иногда я думаю, что Обри это Вадим Ст с наследством в $16млн
Photo, posted without a caption
История с тем, как имморталисты пробуют достичь своих целей — это один в один замечательная история о том, как парень Ваня добивался любви и взаимности от Наташи. Первым делом Ваня написал книжку о своей любви к Наташе. Всего за два года. Не помогло. Тогда написал еще одну книжку, и стихи. Собрал чат из таких же как он безнадежно влюбленных, и поделился своим творчеством с ними. Потом ушёл изучать психологию и филос…
Channel name was changed to «Dark immortalist thoughts»
Channel name was changed to «Dark immortalist satire»
А всё-таки будущий историк скажет с полным основанием, что в замалчивании проблемы борьбы со старением и смертью основная часть вины лежала на учёных и сообществе. Потому что мы конечно можем сколько угодно митинговать друг перед другом или перед какими-то там людьми в твиттерах, но если мы не собираемся и не идём к политикам и ЛПР с конкретным предложением, то извините у них нет телепатических возможностей, чтобы п…
Мне движение имморталистов напоминает какую-то детскую игру. Когда всё понарошку. Люди рассуждают о каких-то глобальных материях, но старательно обходят стороной действия, которые могут вывести это из разряда просто игры. Ну как это так — взять и пойти к decision makers, и попросить их о том, чего нам хочется? мы же понарошку, как же ты не понимаешь)
💯1
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @immortalistdark. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,340,689 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dark immortalist thoughts” (@immortalistdark), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/immortalistdark.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.