Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Міраслаў

Channel

Міраслаў

@immiraslau

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

108subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001694259671
TypeChannel
Username@immiraslau
DescriptionУвлекаюсь медиа, слежу за новостями и делюсь мыслями.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/immiraslau

Growth

1087 August 2026 — 108 subscribers9 August 2026 — 108 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 107–109 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 08:00108no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:43108first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
223
Videos
20
Links
124

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

171 reactions across 20 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2514.6%
💯2011.7%
1911.1%
🔥1810.5%
👍179.94%
custom 598576837279141426384.68%
custom 604168517049332824863.51%
🤩63.51%
🙏52.92%
🤣52.92%
🤯52.92%
🥰52.92%
👀42.34%
🤬42.34%
custom 577408199755091523431.75%
custom 594301134199954161731.75%
🤡31.75%
21.17%
❤‍🔥21.17%
👨‍💻21.17%
7 further kinds95.26%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2025 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC55 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Удары по складам Wildberries выглядят куда серьёзнее, чем может показаться на первый взгляд WB в России давно перестал быть обычным маркетплейсом. Агрессивное и успешное развитие компании привело её к стадии, когда она стала заметной частью повседневной экономической инфраструктуры страны. Это сотни тысяч продавцов, владельцев ПВЗ, логистов и прочих подневольных. Для многих из них WB является основным источником дох

💯4custom 57740819975509152341

9 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC82 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Здоровая коммуникация в медиаорганизациях должна выглядеть именно так. Представьте себе: ходить на работу, где тебя называют «особо одарённым». Сказка!

🔥3

9 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC63 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @belta_telegramm

‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️ЕЩЕ РАЗ - ДЛЯ ОСОБО ОДАРЕННЫХ. СЛАВЯНКА ИСТОРИЯ НА САЙТЕ НЕ РАНЬШЕ 9.30 ДОЛЖНА ВЫХОДИТЬ!!!! НЕЗАВИСИМО ОТ ВЫПУСКА. ВЫПУСК МОЖЕТ ХОТЬ В 7 ВЫПУСТИТЬ!!! ГОЛОВУ ОТРУБЛЮ В СЛЕДУЮЩИЙ РАЗ!

custom 60416851704933282486🤡3😁1😍1custom 59857683727914142631

21 Jun 2026, 19:06 UTC126 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас мы имеем удовольствие наблюдать крайне интересную динамику в беларусско-украинских отношениях. Прошлая неделя ознаменовалась сначала публичными извинениями Лукашенко перед Зеленским (пусть и в своём привычном аморальном стиле), а затем и публичным ультиматумом самого Зеленского Лукашенко. Причём этот ультиматум, касавшийся военной поддержки Беларусью России, не остался единичным высказыванием, а вписался в нов

👀2🤔2custom 57740819975509152341

18 Jun 2026, 10:54 UTC119 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В истории с попаданием дрона по автобусу с беларусскими детьми самый важный вопрос — не столько в том, кто нанёс удар, а в том, почему эти дети вообще оказались так близко к фронту. Это омерзительная халатность и полное наплевательство на безопасность. С таким же успехом можно было бы додуматься отправить детей отдыхать в Мариуполь образца 2022 года. Идёт война. В небе летают дроны с обеих сторон. Удар мог быть как

💯4🔥2🕊1

10 May 2026, 20:30 UTC162 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

> Покупаем рекламу у российского блогера > Делаем вид, будто это не реклама > Координационный совет Беларуси https://t.me/rada_vision/4755

custom 59857683727914142635😁3👨‍💻2

19 Mar 2026, 16:27 UTC237 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Освобождение Эдуарда Пальчиса лично для меня стало крайне важной новостью. Думаю, сейчас уже можно открыто говорить, что Эд был одним из главных идеологов 2020 года. Именно сформулированные им идеи расходились по всем ключевым акторам, которые в те времена могли влиять на повестку. Не всегда эти идеи исполнялись должным образом: всё-таки людей, мнений и каналов связи тогда было очень много. Однако авторитет Пальчиса

9🥰3💩1

19 Mar 2026, 13:43 UTC167 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Нива пишет об освобождении Пальчиса. Но пока не стоит спешить. Ранее мы уже получали такие новости об «освобождении», которые позже не подтверждались. Ждём пересечения границы, а пока скрестили пальцы. Ждём нашего зубра на свободе.

🙏5

2 Feb 2026, 16:13 UTC≈1,300 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Золотой фонд цитат наших СМИ. Контекст.

🤣5🤬42🔥2

4 Jan 2026, 11:42 UTC338 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Видео с баннером оказалось старым, оно было снято ещё в 2024 во время массовых протестов в стране. Тем не менее слова из публикации остаются актуальными. Вот свежий сюжет на эту тему: https://www.reuters.com/video/watch/idRW385403012026RP1/?chan=home

👍1custom 57740819975509152341

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @immiraslau. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,080,704 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Міраслаў” (@immiraslau), 108 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/immiraslau.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.