Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Immortalwrt-ImageBuilder

Channel

Immortalwrt-ImageBuilder

@imm_imagebuilder

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

57subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004236200513
TypeChannel
Username@imm_imagebuilder
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 29 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/imm_imagebuilder

Growth

445750.56 August 2026 — 44 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44 subscribers12 August 2026 — 47 subscribers20 August 2026 — 50 subscribers28 August 2026 — 57 subscribers6 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42–59 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 06:1257+7
20 Aug 2026, 08:0350+3
12 Aug 2026, 20:4447+3
10 Aug 2026, 15:3144no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:4644first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3736.8%
avg views ÷ 57 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,130
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held7 (29 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total2,130
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC≈2,130 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

为了避免大家理解不到位,防止用户设置过大的软件包大小,造成github服务器打包空间不足,工作流的UI 中,软件包空间大小做了下拉选项。不再是以前自由设置了。 规定只能从1G、2G、3G、4G,这几个选项里选择。如图所示,默认1GB。还能选其他。

9 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC≈3,960 viewsread 10 August 2026

版本升级到 25.12.1 ,新增机型【aliyun_ap8220】 https://github.com/wukongdaily/ImmortalWrt-ImageBuilder/commit/b30dd56892c059505332aac8521aa34e327922a3

29 Jun 2026, 14:32 UTC190 viewsread 10 August 2026

这里重申一下此项目的定位:https://github.com/wukongdaily/ImmortalWrt-ImageBuilder/discussions/649

29 Jun 2026, 14:31 UTC171 viewsread 10 August 2026

ImmortalWrt-ImageBuilder ⚠️ 重要声明 本项目为个人独立维护的第三方项目(脚本),与 ImmortalWrt 官方没有关联。 项目中使用了 ImmortalWrt 官方 ImageBuilder 工具打包生成固件。 但用户自行定制产生的任何 bug,均不代表 ImmortalWrt 官方固件的 bug 为了不给 ImmortalWrt 上游维护者增加额外负担和麻烦,所有相关问题请勿在 ImmortalWrt 群内反馈。 建议各位在本项目 Discussions 中提问或讨论

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @imm_imagebuilder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 270,089 of 1,626,711entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Immortalwrt-ImageBuilder” (@imm_imagebuilder), 57 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imm_imagebuilder.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.