Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ОКСИмирон

@imbl00m

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

96subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001770252301
TypeChannel
Username@imbl00m
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/imbl00m

Growth

969 Aug 2026, 23:15 — 96 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 22:11 — 96 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 23:1510 Aug 2026, 22:11
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95–97 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 22:1196no change
9 Aug 2026, 23:1596first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 23 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52381202614080053653224.8%
💋3124.0%
custom 52626369011012170913023.3%
custom 52470836004567273742217.1%
custom 5345973238172234914118.53%
custom 536196783811645357932.33%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 18 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jun 2026, 21:03 UTC95 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @anechkasepaevaVideo

они к чему то определено готовы

custom 52626369011012170914💋3custom 52381202614080053651

25 Apr 2026, 21:33 UTC223 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Порой я не выкупаю, она рофлит или нет Мастер рофлянчик😈 Знайте, в кого у меня юмор

💋8custom 53459732381722349148custom 52381202614080053653custom 53619678381164535793

12 Apr 2026, 13:26 UTC232 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Тот самый, кто лайкает все твои сторис и кидает огоньки в директ 😏

custom 523812026140800536513custom 524708360045672737412custom 52626369011012170916

1 Apr 2026, 07:56 UTC247 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

📍Amura 10/10 Гедза с креветкой в самое сердце💕 Что съели, то и скинули🪦🪦 📍Треня 7/10 Хихик словила, но умерла…

custom 52626369011012170917custom 52381202614080053655custom 53459732381722349143custom 52470836004567273742

29 Mar 2026, 21:15 UTC161 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

🥰❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❤️❤️❤️❤️🥰 (Не)идеально идеальна, baby 😎Липсинги в реальной жизни😎 Боже, простите меня, но я хочу снимать тупые липсинги, кривляя лицом и вставлять строчки Егора Крида повсюду. Осталось научиться снимать и не кринжевать с этого.

💋12custom 52470836004567273748custom 52626369011012170914

23 Mar 2026, 22:03 UTC210 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Эстетка фотка часть 2

custom 52626369011012170916💋4custom 52381202614080053653

23 Mar 2026, 22:03 UTC158 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Эстетка фотка часть 1

custom 52381202614080053657💋4custom 52626369011012170913

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @imbl00m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 840,151 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ОКСИмирон” (@imbl00m), 96 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imbl00m.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.