4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,044–1,050 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 12:46
1,045
-1
10 Aug 2026, 23:17
1,046
-3
7 Aug 2026, 22:57
1,049
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:16
1,049
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 24 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
202 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
40
19.8%
😁
35
17.3%
❤🔥
22
10.9%
🫡
20
9.90%
😎
19
9.41%
❤
18
8.91%
🤯
16
7.92%
👍
11
5.45%
😢
8
3.96%
👏
7
3.47%
🏆
4
1.98%
🥰
2
0.99%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2025 to 17 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 8 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @imbalifestyle. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 June 2025 to 17 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Решил сегодня порадовать себя подарком в связи с инвестом шибы и поступлением в любимый университет, и взял браслетик, чтобы не выделяться среди студентов ИТМО. Вообще сейчас нахожусь в Дубае и жестко отдыхаю, надеюсь что на днях будет какой-то контент, но пока что это все заканчивается бичклабом, безлимитным алкоголем и чахой (конечно в hookahplace, в остальных она говно). Остальное дао пока что на Кипре, настолько …
Хочется всех обрадовать, что крипта стала потихоньку оживать и даже щитки типа эфира показывают рост, лично я стараюсь не сильно лудить на фьючах и фармить на нашей любимой бирже шибу.
В Питере хорошая погода, а часть дао жестко чиллит на Кипре - наслаждаясь всеми преимуществами западной цивилизации, гольф, бирфесты и свежие морепродукты. Хотим вам еще раз напомнить про долгожданное для всех мероприятие, куда в еще м…
Это Питерский дрифт детка 🚘
Наверное никогда не был таким спокойным, как после часа на трассе. Настолько много адреналина в перемешку с напряжением мозга в попытке скоординировать руки и ноги, кайф ебейший. Ну и самое сложное это научиться слушать и чувствовать машину. Мега рекомендую.
Когда инструктор показал класс с пассажирского сиденья руля одной рукой под дождь молнии и ураганный ветер я чуть не писанул от рад…
Пока все криптаны с кайфом проводят лето где-то на море - я сижу и ебашу поступление в магистратуру.
Да да, мне так понравилось учиться в итмо, что я подумал - почему бы не продлить этот кайф еще на 2 года. Тем более если сложность занятий не будет увеличена, то в целом и сидеть в крипте учеба мешать не будет.
Пока что никаких веселых историй с поступления нет, тк на удивление даже все хорошо с организационными мон…
Устроили ночной форсаж по Питерским акваториям 🕶
Воркаут замечательный, особенно против течения.
Чаще делайте то, что делаете редко. Чаще делайте то, что вообще никогда не делали. Нельзя жить обыденностью, скука убивает.
Всем вечернего бриза!
Сводка за неделю:
Плюсы:
Собрал всех друзей загородом 👒
Отпраздновал день рождения 🐿
Приготовил ахуенный плов 👨🍳
Еж притащил тридцатилетний курвазер 🥂
Три дня провел без телефона 🧘
Минусы:
Чуть не умер, потому что оказывается без доп ферментов мне крайне противопоказано пить много алкоголя и есть жареное, острое и жирное 👨⚕️
Траванулся какой-то колбаской, поэтому опять чуть не умер 👀
В общем и целом, после тако…
У меня начало рабочей недели проходил просто незабываемо - я поел где-то непонятной еды (морепродуктов объелся), с кайфом проблевался утром, и теперь езжу к врачам сдавать анализы и уже сделал ФГС. Это незабываемая процедура ни с чем не сравнится - когда тебе в горло засовывают трубку размером с мизинец :)
Из плюсов - сижу в идеальной локации с бабушками и могу послушать кучу полезной инфы про то, где нужно брать де…
Вчера тестировали Российские ракеты дальнего действия.
Все работает исправно, проблем нет. Снегуру уже можно начинать трястись, наш ответ на клевету будет жесткий!
У этой ракеты кстати есть отличное свойство. Она обрывается раз в десять лет и прокает бесплатное катание. В этот раз не повезло, к сожалению…(
Если что, нас на фото нет, угрожать бедным ребятам не надо, зачильтесь 🤩
😁18🤯5🫡4
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @imbalifestyle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 900,136 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@imbalifestyle named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@oxconnect_awards_bot named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IMBA Lifestyle” (@imbalifestyle), 1,045 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imbalifestyle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
