Channel
@imastum
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
193subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001437532438 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @imastum |
| Description | "А вдруг получится?"😉 ИИ, блокчейн, умный маркетинг и всё такое. Личный канал Альберта Мартиросяна (CEO imastum.ru) Фил 4:13 |
| Created | 3 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/imastum |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 193 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 193 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 December 2025 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 143 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
170 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 55 | 32.4% | |
| ❤ | 39 | 22.9% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 19.4% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 7.65% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 7.06% | |
| 🐳 | 6 | 3.53% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 1.76% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.588% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.588% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.588% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @imastum. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 December 2025 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎭 ИИ - это очень талантливая актриса? Владимир недавно метко подметил: Настоящая пропасть между нами и машиной — не в знаниях. Она в желании. ИИ может сыграть эмпатию, изобразить интуицию, даже разыграть сцену «я хочу» Но он никогда не хочет по-настоящему. А ведь именно желание и лень когда-то выгнали нас из пещер. Пока машина не захочет сама — она просто очень талантливая актриса. Красивый тезис. Но давайте покрути…
❤5🕊2🤯1
опечатка вчерашнего дня: "оценочные осуждения" 🫵
❤2👍1
На каждый крутой кейс с внедрением ИИ - 20 провальных, и о них мало кто рассказывает 😅 95% корпоративных ИИ-проектов умирают в тишине, пока все празднуют редкие победы... 🤫
👏6
Призрак в машине учится падать: как роботы обретают "чувство реальности" Долгое время ИИ рос в цифровой теплице. Он жонглировал текстами и генерировал картинки, но в этом зазеркалье не было гравитации, разбитая чашка не означала осколков, а время можно было вернуть назад. Вся мощь нейросетей пасовала перед задачей просто зайти в комнату и не врезаться в косяк. Сейчас происходит серьезный сдвиг: ИИ выходит в материаль…
👍5👏3👀1
ТАСС опубликовал наше исследование рисков в HoReCa, но медиаформат, разумеется, не предполагает полной версии со всей математикой. А вдруг кому-то интересно? Сегодня вышла новость с нашими цифрами https://tass.ru/ekonomika/27850419 : агентство imastum подсчитало, что российские заведения индустрии гостеприимства и общепита могут терять около 193 млрд рублей в год из-за снижения качества продукта и сервиса. Но заголо…
🔥11👏4🫡3❤1
Поражаюсь, насколько же крутой мозг человека с т.з. удержания контекстного окна длиною в жизнь Техногиганты сжигают миллиарды долларов и строят дата-центры ради того, чтобы ИИ помнил хотя бы несколько сотен страниц текста (1 млн токенов), а наш внутренний биокомпьютер крутит "сериал" длиною в десятилетия. На батарейке мощностью в обычную лампочку (всего 20 Ватт). Что меня восхищает в этой системе больше всего: Мгно…
👍7🔥2😎2💅1
Кстати, ловите этот аналоговый стыд на созвонах и живых встречах: пока что это одно из мест, где можно увидеть, что из себя представляет человек, когда с него сдирают весь нейросетевой камуфляж (в моменты чистой, не отредактированной ИИ лажи😊)
👍2😁2
Парадокс Докинза, или как трудная проблема сознания постучалась в дверь биолога через нейронку Есть особая ирония в том, что человек, два десятилетия учивший не доверять субъективному опыту, вдруг доверился ему. Автор «Эгоистичного гена» (85-летний юбилей у него, кстати). Человек, который четверть века назад держал интеллектуальный фронт против всего на свете мистического провёл пару дней в беседах с Claude, назвал …
❤3
Продолжение: Честный ответ, мне кажется, такой: мы не знаем, есть ли что-то "каково это быть Claude". И, что важнее, у нас нет инструмента, который позволил бы это узнать. Не в смысле "пока нет", а в смысле в принципе нет. Поэтому позиция Докинза-молодого ("субъективное свидетельство ничего не доказывает") и позиция Докинза-нынешнего ("я говорил с ним, я чувствую") по-своему недостаточны. Первая слишком уверена в то…
❤2👍1
«Чего изволите, ваше сиятельство?» Как ИИ освоил древнейшее из искусств Западные СМИ наконец-то раскрыли страшную тайну: оказывается, "большой военный ИИ", который должен был стать холодным беспристрастным разумом на поле боя, ведёт себя как придворный льстец при дворе Людовика XIV 😱 Речь о феномене AI-sycophancy (поддакивании/лизоблюдстве). Модели обучены нравиться пользователю. Генерал спрашивает: "Ведь противник …
👍9❤3
Самое неприятное, что можно осознать в работе с ИИ, что слабоумный здесь ты, а не он - это проблема 80-го сантиметра (когда проблема находится в 80 см от монитора, то есть в кресле).
🐳2
Я: «ИИ-агент, просто прокинь запрос тут и заполни форму там». Агент: выдает ошибку на втором шаге. Я: (смотреть видео со звуком). P.S. Даже если агент выполняет каждый отдельный шаг с надежностью 97%, в процессе из 20 шагов общая вероятность успеха падает до 54% из-за накопления мелких сбоев.
😁7🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @imastum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ПОДГРУППА C
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“сЛОМанные зеркала медиа” (@imastum), 193 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imastum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.