Channel
@imasgo_writes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
493subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001473471613 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @imasgo_writes |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 4 March 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/imasgo_writes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 493 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 494 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 494 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 March 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
49 reactions across 1 post, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 55.1% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 20.4% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 14.3% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 8.16% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2021 to 1 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Guess who's back in the house? Всем привет! Давно не виделись 🔥 Толковых постов в канале не было с бородатого 2021 - связано это было в первую очередь с тем, что я попала на работу в FAANG и нырнула в это с головой. Если что, тут сразу же дисклеймер большими буквами - мое мнение не является официальным мнением компании, в которой я работаю; все, что написано мной в канал - мои мысли. Несмотря на это, желание писат…
❤27🔥10👍7🥰4👏1
ШМЯ великая абсолютно, бегите бегом - говорю вам как выпускница 2018. ШМЯ в свое время дала мне хорошее понимание того, как все работает в целом и 100% помогла быть там, где я сейчас.
Сегодня последний день подачи на ШМЯ Знаю, что многие подписались на меня из-за этой тематики. Поэтому ловите несколько полезностей, они также помогут и просто в работе при описании и структурировании задач 😉 1. Проверьте свой текст перед отправкой на главреде, чтобы отчистить его от мусора. Очень важно, чтобы ваш текст хорошо читался, чтобы не было воды и вещей, которые могут двусмысленно воспринимался. Про собл…
Если вы не понимаете, как здесь оказались и что делать, или вам это переслали в ваш маркетинговый чат, то просто нажимайте на эту ссылку: ССЫЛКА ДЛЯ РЕШИТЕЛЬНОГО НАЖАТИЯ и потом там скрольте вниз. Поверьте, так надо. Нет времени объяснять.
https://www.reforge.com/blog/unshipping-features
Как человек, который вырезал фичи последние полгода говорю, что хорошие картиночки!
Про Gopractice Simulator В последнее время я все чаще замечаю то, что курсов для прокачки продуктовых скиллов стало много, и непонятно, какие из них действительно стоящие. Сегодня расскажу вам про Gopractice Simulator - симулятор по управлению продуктом на основе данных. Меня этот курс здорово выручал, когда я только начинала работать в Qured. В симуляторе рассказывается о близкой к моей ситуации, в которой в комп…
Photo, posted without a caption
Чувствую себя атакованной
Photo, posted without a caption
HIRE ME коммитами на гитхабе Всем привет, сегодня пост будет не продуктовый, а околоразработческий! Про продукт тоже есть что рассказать хорошего, но попозже. Недавно разговаривала с СТО про собеседовательный процесс и найм разработчиков. Услышала классные истории про то, что люди просят друзей проходить собеседования за них, пользуясь тем, как построен собеседовательный процесс в крупных компаниях вроде Гуглов и …
Всем приветос! Через 10 минут начинаем болтать с Аней в Зуме 🙂 Подключайтесь: https://avito.zoom.us/j/4686785087
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @imasgo_writes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@imasgo_writes named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Про продукт из Лондона” (@imasgo_writes), 493 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imasgo_writes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.