Channel
@imagine_au
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
462subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002346681790 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @imagine_au |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/imagine_au |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 462 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 462 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 14 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (14 January 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,115 |
| Reactions total | 199 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,573 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5398046246302662335 | 486 | 30.9% | |
| custom 5357225116184887687 | 345 | 21.9% | |
| custom 5291977343118640335 | 273 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5289874613029862399 | 215 | 13.7% | |
| custom 5260511519354929265 | 96 | 6.10% | |
| custom 5336810088654981290 | 96 | 6.10% | |
| custom 5260373904307794981 | 62 | 3.94% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,573reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⠀ 🔎он ревнует к другу🔎 ” be the one ” lloyd реакция в комментариях⬇️ коллаб с замечательной zeros|🪽 первую часть с хен лайном вы можете найти у нее :) [#реакция]
custom 539804624630266233546custom 529197734311864033522custom 535722511618488768721custom 52898746130298623995
⠀ 🔎может дашь мне шанс?🔎 ” for love’s sake ” abby powledge реакция в комментариях⬇️ [#реакция]
custom 528987461302986239949custom 529197734311864033526custom 535722511618488768719custom 539804624630266233511
⠀ 🔎was it ever casual?..🔎 ” claw marks ” panicbaby реакция в комментариях⬇️ [#реакция]
custom 529197734311864033560custom 535722511618488768734custom 528987461302986239923custom 53980462463026623359
⠀ 🔎вы враги, но…🔎 ” t. A. T. u all the things she said “ (instrumental break) реакция в комментариях⬇️ [#реакция]
custom 539804624630266233583custom 535722511618488768743custom 528987461302986239929custom 529197734311864033512
⠀ 🔎ассоциации🔎 ” f3miii NOBLE “ реакция в комментариях⬇️ [#реакция]
custom 535722511618488768745custom 539804624630266233528custom 529197734311864033517custom 528987461302986239910
⠀ 🔎его не стало🔎 ” P¡nk who knew “ 🔎TW: смерть основного персонажа — Кто бы мог знать, что все так закончится… реакция в комментариях⬇️ [#реакция]
custom 529197734311864033544custom 535722511618488768730custom 528987461302986239916custom 539804624630266233513
⠀ 🔎ты решила похудеть, чтобы соответствовать ему🔎 ” Alessia Cara scars to your beautiful “ — Ты прекрасная такая, какая ты есть реакция в комментариях⬇️ [#реакция]
custom 539804624630266233578custom 535722511618488768741custom 528987461302986239923custom 529197734311864033512
⠀ 🔎родители против ваших отношений🔎 ” M’Dee — нужна “ — Три слова на губах: «Ты мне нужна» реакция в комментариях⬇️ [#реакция]
custom 539804624630266233571custom 528987461302986239930custom 535722511618488768724custom 529197734311864033511
будем считать это новым стартом, так что если у вас есть идеи или форматы, которые вы бы хотели от меня видеть, можете поделиться в анонимке, комментариях или сообщениях канала (где вам комфортнее). буду благодарна и открыта к любым идеям♥️
custom 539804624630266233548custom 529197734311864033514custom 52898746130298623999custom 53572251161848876874
приветствую всех! мне максимально неловко писать этот пост, так как не было меня тут давненько. буду честна, я уже писала пост о прекращении работы канала… мне казалось, это наиболее логичным исходом, так как моя скачкообразная активность здесь ни мне, ни вам, наверняка, не нравится и надоела но рвение к писательству никуда не исчезло, даже если и не получалось уделять должное внимание ему. поэтому я бы хотела дать …
custom 539804624630266233563custom 529197734311864033530custom 535722511618488768720custom 52898746130298623999
🔎вы расстались и не виделись долгое время🔎 ” 1 part; 2 part “ the end — А в голове куча мыслей о том, как ты вообще провела столько времени без него? реакция в комментариях⬇️ [#реакция]
custom 535722511618488768764custom 539804624630266233536custom 529197734311864033525custom 52898746130298623999
#неспойлерю 🫢 А еще я помню о зарисовке, которую обещала в этом посте. Она в процессе, и в скором времени тоже выложу🙏 И хочется попросить пока не обращать внимание на оформление. Есть желание новое что-то сделать, а идеи пока нет. Поэтому выглядит сумбурно
custom 533681008865498129034custom 526037390430779498119custom 526051151935492926512
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @imagine_au. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,093,376 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝜗𝜚˚обиᴛᴇᴧь ᴛини ⋆” (@imagine_au), 462 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imagine_au.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.