Channel
@imagicaimagica
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002972619770 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @imagicaimagica |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/imagicaimagica |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 30 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 30 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 13 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (13 January 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 116 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
128 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 58 | 45.3% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 22.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 20 | 15.6% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 3.13% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 3.13% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 2.34% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.34% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 2.34% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.34% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.781% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всё это время тишины я писала работы на Фандомную Битву. Так что выдаю трансформерский дроп после деанона нерейтинговых текстов! #tf 🔴Сгореть Мегопы Стихотворное послание Мегатрона. Не писала стихи примерно вечность, но Мегатрон заставил вспомнить о лирике. 🔴Между гневом и жалостью Дэдлок/Рэтчет Дэдлок снова встречает Рэтчета — теперь они по разные стороны баррикад. Это меняет всё и не меняет ничего. 🔴Маленькая ло…
❤8
Я даже не знаю, с чего начать, учитывая, что продолжения не было аж с ноября. Поэтому буду краткой — новая часть «Синтетического рая», в которой Найс и Рэк принимают важное решение. Сумбурное на первый взгляд — наверное, как и в жизни. 🔴 Архив 🔴 Фикбук #tbhx P.S. Всякое-разное будет к летней ФБ.
❤7🔥3
Наконец делюсь фиком на тайного Валентина. Внезапно Просветитель и его нездоровые отношения с Шан Дэ. Он всегда был хорош в том, чтобы искать, соединять неочевидное, находить связи там, куда иной бы и не посмотрел. Такой человек и нужен был Шан Дэ — всевидящее око, способное прорваться своим взором сквозь ткань реальности, ради правды, ради… Читать на Архиве: 🕶 Справедливости и зрелищ #tbhx
❤5🔥2🥰1
ЗФБ-2026 завершилась! Спасибо всем, кто следил за работами команды TBHX 🌸 По ссылке можно посмотреть полный каталог командной выкладки — и визуал, и тексты. tags :: #take || @tbhXcf_bot
❤5
Вообще уже давно можно деанонить реверс, а я все никак не могла собраться и сделать пост. Исправляюсь! Обе текстовые работы от команды на этот этап — мои. «Вместо воздуха» был вдохновлен коллажем (сходите лайкнуть) и вырос из набросков, которые я делала к райтобрю от Роны — обещала же когда-нибудь закончить, хех. Тогдашней темой из списка была «многие ли задыхаются от любви», так что... получились юные неловкие вра…
❤8🔥5🥰1
Мой тайный Валентин подарила мне чудесных вампирских мунлинов 🥹 Сходите лайкнуть в канале художника! А я под это дело запощу ещё раз тематический драбблец. #tbhx Он сидел на краю кровати в расстёгнутой рубашке — и смотрел в стену, судорожно сцепляя пальцы. Луна неслышно появилась в комнате, и Линь Лин тут же обратил взгляд на неё. Уже привыкла игнорировать дверь — а он никогда не был против. — Ты хотел поговорить…
❤7🔥4
Имаджика: пишет поздравительный фик тоже Имаджика: случайно опрокидывает в фик солонку с безнадегой и драмой
❤🔥4😁3
Я хотела чуть-чуть поболтать о текстах на рейтинговую выкладку — рассказываю. Сообщение со скрина — про один из трех фиков. Но я вообще люблю интертекстовать там-сям, тут в какой фик ни ткни, отсылку найдешь. В общем, первым в тройке был «(Само)обман», и сказать о нем мне особенно нечего кроме того, что я писала его после точки, в которой значительно переосмыслила для себя многое в части авторства. Поэтому, возможн…
❤6👀4💘3
Деанон? Деанон. На рейтинговую выкладку я написала в команду три текста. В этом посте выдам дайджест, а уже на днях порассуждаю о том, как же так получилось (с нетипичными для меня пейрингами, например). 🔴Зеркало на стене, рама для картины Луна/Найс, врайсы, все втроём Доверие оставляет от Найса всё меньше его самого. Луна ищет ответы. 💜(Само)обман Ян Чэн/Найс Ян Чэн совершает эту ошибку снова и снова. 🕶Безра…
🔥5❤🔥3❤2🥰1
Мы уже дошли до рейтинговой выкладки. Заходите почитать! В ожидании деанона накину фанфакт о моем тексте из низкого рейтинга: в этом фике Найс и Рэк смотрят по сути фильм про самих себя — образы для него я взяла из ненаписанной аушки про убийства в студенческом кампусе. Там задел на макси, поэтому решила использовать хотя бы так. #tbhx
❤4🔥1
Прастите но я ору с разных реакций Тройка сикеров и приказ мегза🤣
🌚2💘1😱1
Вскрываемся деанонимся на нерейтинговой выкладке ЗФБ! На нее я написала один фик. Найс не подписал контракт с «Триман», выбрав совместный с Рэком путь. Но даже правильные решения не избавляют от сомнений. Почитать можно на Архиве: 💜Всего лишь герой средней руки #tbhx
❤🔥7❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @imagicaimagica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,239,941 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Имаджика имаджинирует” (@imagicaimagica), 30 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imagicaimagica.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.