Может тоже вернуться…?)..
custom 535072203318757124323

Channel
@imPrinceOfSlytherin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
417subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001345948993 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @imPrinceOfSlytherin |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/imPrinceOfSlytherin |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 23:18 | 417 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 420 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:19 | 424 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 426 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 425 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
95 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5350722033187571243 | 41 | 43.2% | |
| custom 5323388341624782688 | 30 | 31.6% | |
| custom 5309997741697419272 | 15 | 15.8% | |
| custom 5361671807495582250 | 7 | 7.37% | |
| custom 5402486404968099908 | 2 | 2.11% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 25 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Может тоже вернуться…?)..
custom 535072203318757124323
⚡️⚡️⚡️
custom 532338834162478268812custom 535072203318757124311custom 53616718074955822505
сука где вариант одноклассники
custom 53099977416974192726custom 53233883416247826883custom 54024864049680999081
И так. У нас хотят заблокировать телеграмм. В связи с этим, решаем, куда переводим вселенную:
The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Шагая ко входу в замок, девушка слегка сбавила ход и вернула взгляд блондину, — Может и расскажу. А ты мне за это что? — Вскинув бровь, Чжоу не смогла сдержать улыбки. Она не была уверена, помнил ли он, но… — Это другая, закрытая культура, Малфой. Это же колыбель волшебства. Там столько тайн, ну знаешь, фишек всяких… — Это было забавно, даже если он и не помнил. Когда-то, пару лет назад они столкнулись на квиддичн…
custom 53507220331875712436custom 53233883416247826883custom 53099977416974192722custom 53616718074955822501
Малфой не мог признать, что семья Чжоу его заинтересовала. Да, безусловно, он был знаком с китайцами, но те китайцы, которых он знал, были слишком… европейскими?.. С чистокровной китайской кровью, людьми, связанными с традиционной китайской аристократией он не сталкивался, поэтому фотография его зацепила. Хотелось узнать больше и глубже про родню однокурсницы, но Малфой не был уверен, что сейчас она была готова долго…
«Даже не верится, что у нас получилось…» — проронил Драко, но она не могла согласиться с ним. Да, столь сложная магия обычно не даётся легко и с первого раза, особенно учитывая неуверенность или заминки, но… Мерлин, это же было очевидно. Только маггловский ребёнок не знал о способностях и силе крови Блэков. Добавить к этому её навыки и глубину чистых корней и получится почти коллапс Флитвика как профессора, — Очен…
File, posted without a caption
Шар принялся приобретать более четкие очертания. — Готова? — уточнил Малфой, постепенно становясь чуть далее, напротив Чжоу, держа палочку на весу, — кажется у нас получается. Давай! Concordia! Ему и Чжоу удалось взмахнуть палочками одновременно; из палочек вылетел яркий свет, похожий на солнечный луч, который полетел стремительно с двух сторон в шар, заполняя его. Шар засветился и начал вращаться, становясь больше…
custom 53616718074955822501
Созданный шар мерцал и подрагивал перед ней, девушка понимала что медлить ни к чему, однако практика новых заклинаний — вещь совершенно не простая в исполнении. Особенно таких. Она занесла палочку, вспоминая связку букв и немного нервничала. Нервничала, потому что здесь требовался свет, а Чанг не была уверена что после всего — в её магическом отпечатке этого вещества в достатке. Сглотнув, Чжоу на секунду подумала о…
custom 53099977416974192723custom 54024864049680999081
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53233883416247826881custom 53507220331875712431
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @imPrinceOfSlytherin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
И так. У нас хотят заблокировать телеграмм. В связи с этим, решаем, куда переводим вселенную:
The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 25 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🐍 Slytherin Prince Diary 🐍” (@imPrinceOfSlytherin), 417 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imPrinceOfSlytherin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.