Video, posted without a caption
custom 53237878079430551829

Channel
@ilyakaksam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
294subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001561441490 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ilyakaksam |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ilyakaksam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 294 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 294 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 14 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (14 February 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 333 |
| Reactions total | 15 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
222 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5465262274031659421 | 57 | 25.7% | |
| custom 5226928895189598791 | 48 | 21.6% | |
| custom 5463412289883353404 | 42 | 18.9% | |
| custom 5422538735394766352 | 34 | 15.3% | |
| custom 5215503483318325191 | 15 | 6.76% | |
| custom 5323787807943055182 | 15 | 6.76% | |
| custom 5197350061012436657 | 11 | 4.95% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ilyakaksam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 February 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Video, posted without a caption
custom 53237878079430551829
Скоро 30. Треш, конечно!
custom 53237878079430551826
Легкого балдежа вам в ленту✨✨✨
custom 52155034833183251919custom 54225387353947663526custom 51973500610124366571
Пост гордости и любви планируется. За последние несколько месяцев окончательно не разочароваться в себе меня удерживает Детский КВН(Сам в шоке, никогда бы не подумал). Я пишу третий год одной команде в городе, а точнее команде из Мегашколы. У нас в городе открылась 3 года назад самая большая школа в стране и естественно ей нужна хорошая, крепкая команда. Я от КВН далек был к этому моменту лет 5 и брал их по началу …
custom 542253873539476635218custom 51973500610124366579custom 52155034833183251915
Все, кто на сегодняшний день все еще пишут в начале постов вот эту шляпу «😁😆😁» очень оригинальные и творческие люди, у вас все получится, как только бросите заниматься юмором.
custom 542253873539476635210custom 51973500610124366571custom 52155034833183251911
💎КАК ПРОШЕЛ СОЛЬНЫЙ КОНЦЕРТ💎 Мне хватило дней переварить все мысли по поводу сольника, чтобы отписать сюда впечатления и думки свои. Собрал я около 55 человек. Благодарен каждому невероятно за посещение. Не хватит моего знания русского языка и приемов в нем, чтобы описать благодарность, которую я испытываю к вам. 55 - нормально. Начало появления моего довольного лица начиналось с 70, но 55 это число, которое как ми…
custom 54652622740316594219custom 52269288951895987915custom 54634122898833534045
https://standupvoronezh.ru/levchenko вдруг нечего делать вечером, билетов еще много, приходи!
custom 54652622740316594211
Кто бы ты не была, но ты вообще прям не успела
custom 522692889518959879115custom 54634122898833534048custom 54652622740316594215
Не понимаю, почему никто не обсуждает и нет никаких видосов в рекомендациях, как невероятно круто Савичева начала делать крутейшее музло и вообще появилась обратно в нашем инфополе.
custom 54652622740316594216custom 52269288951895987912custom 54634122898833534042
Я вчера обещал анонс и вот он происходит! 22 марта в 20:00 мой третий сольный концерт в жизни. Каждый концерт я делаю из материала, которого не было на прошлом, в этом постараюсь сделать тоже самое и плюсом ко всему на каждом концерте я рассказываю блок, которого после этого концерта не существует и вы его нигде не услышите. Только 22 марта в 20:00 и все, шансов нет. Я цену задирать не стал, сделал базу, поэтому над…
custom 546341228988335340413custom 52269288951895987916custom 54652622740316594215
Редко я тут появляюсь, редко я тут был всю зиму, попытаюсь про это написать. Зима - самое ненавидимое мной время года. Я ровно неделю готов терпеть эту зиму, ровно неделю она прикольная, дальше все, хочется быстрее уже спрятать зимнюю куртку и начинается утомительное ожидание таяния снега вперемешку с дерьмом. Я этой зимой просто ленивое чудовище. Я ничего не делал, я просто деградирую и начинаю активничать впритык …
custom 546526227403165942113custom 522692889518959879111custom 54634122898833534044
С 14 февраля всех, ребята!
custom 546526227403165942118custom 546341228988335340410custom 52269288951895987919
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ilyakaksam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 874,446 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LEVCHENKO” (@ilyakaksam), 294 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilyakaksam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.