Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐭𝐨𝐪𝐚.⋆˙

@ilv_rabobty

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

106subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002547225442
TypeChannel
Username@ilv_rabobty
Description- 𝘌𝘯𝘵𝘫.ৎ - Hmmm…︖﹖ - Just nothing⊹ ୨ - Site: @tktk_toqaBot -vixen.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ilv_rabobty

Growth

1069 Aug 2026, 20:47 — 106 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 21:00 — 106 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 20:479 Aug 2026, 21:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 105–107 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 21:00106no change
9 Aug 2026, 20:47106first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
127.8%
avg views ÷ 106 subscribers
Avg views / post
136
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held17 (20 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,355
Reactions total50
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
94
Videos
2
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

137 reactions across 8 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓3021.9%
😭2719.7%
💘1813.1%
128.76%
💋107.30%
🔥96.57%
🆒64.38%
💯64.38%
👾32.19%
21.46%
❤‍🔥21.46%
🕊21.46%
🙈21.46%
🏆10.73%
🐳10.73%
😎10.73%
😱10.73%
🙉10.73%
🙊10.73%
🤯10.73%
1 further kind10.73%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ilv_rabobty. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC29 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭 𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐪𝐢 𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐝𝐚𝐲, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐪𝐢𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐣𝐨𝐲𝐟𝐮𝐥, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐮𝐦𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐟𝐚𝐥𝐬𝐞𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐝, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲.

💘1🆒1

26 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC186 views18 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

New oc. ˖ ݁𖥔 ݁˖ 𐙚 ˖ ݁𖥔 ݁˖ A bad art.

🍓52💋2💘2🔥2👾1💯1🕊1

21 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC146 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @artSamakoPhoto

⊹ ࣪ ˖تعاون رسم شخصيات دروب دوريمي | Ojamajo Doremi يم ساماكو⊹ ࣪ ˖ ★اني راح ارسل الشخصيات باول تعليق، كل الي عليك تسويه تختار شخصية مو محجوزة وترسمها باسلوبك+ وجه منشور الفعالية بقناتك★ المحجوزات👇🏻: _هانا - ساماكو. _ماجو توربيون - تقى. _ايكو (الزرقاء) - ريسا. _دوريمي - جنجن. _لالا -كونان. _يوكي -بقبق. _ماجو مونرو - هانا ارت. _هاروكا (ام دوريمي) - بينك بيري. _سيكي - نرجص. اونبو (البنفسجية) - كوناي. الفعالية مدة اسبوع

15 Jul 2026, 22:52 UTC372 views26 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

𝐻𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑦𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑎𝑦: 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑒... 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑦𝑠: 𝑇𝑟𝑦. 𝐴𝑛𝑑 ℎ𝑜𝑤 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑢𝑙 𝑠ℎ𝑒 𝑖𝑠... 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛 𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑜𝑓 ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑓𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑠. ⋆。𖦹°⭒˚。⋆ 🫦

🍓113💯3💋2💘2❤‍🔥1🤯1😎1

28 Jun 2026, 16:38 UTC541 views27 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

𝐌𝐲 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐝𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐝𝐫𝐚𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠ᝰ.ᐟ "𝐈 𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡." 𝐈 𝐞𝐧𝐣𝐨𝐲𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐭, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐈 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐝𝐫𝐚𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬. —— ( ꩜ ᯅ ꩜;) 

💘10🍓43💋2🔥21❤‍🔥1🏆1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ilv_rabobty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 873,593 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐭𝐨𝐪𝐚.⋆˙” (@ilv_rabobty), 106 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilv_rabobty.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.