Channel
@ilpensieroharduo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
55subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004311330950 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ilpensieroharduo |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 2 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ilpensieroharduo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 55 | +7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 48 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 48 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (2 July 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 182 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
47 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 18 | 38.3% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 31.9% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 25.5% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Su IL DETONATORE, Roberto Addeo (scrittore, poeta e musicista di graffiante talento) ha dedicato al mio SOTTOSOPRA. Il mondo dopo Stranger Things tra declino e destino una lettura puntualissima, capace di cogliere il cuore del libro, definendolo «una fenditura per guardare il mondo». Mi ha emozionato la parte dedicata alla vita vissuta insieme, quando eravamo – e non abbiam mai smesso d'esserlo – poiētaí disturbanti……
🔥4
Ho pubblicato sul mio profilo Facebook un paio di riflessioni a partire dall’Odissea di Nolan – che, sottolineo, mi ha causato rigetto dopo appena tre minuti. La prima riflessione è più metapolitica, sul wokismo: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/14iHukJBoN5/ La seconda è più teoretica, sul senso della mitopoiesi: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1E4aaNQzE6/ Vale da invito al confronto.
❤2👍1
«Dopo Socrate non si può più salvare il Bene Comune: di qui nasce l'etica individuale, che vuole salvare i singoli. L'enorme e indiscriminato impulso verso una conoscenza a sfondo storico è un segno che la vita è invecchiata: grande è il pericolo che gli individui peggiorino, ed è per questo che i loro interessi si legano con tanta forza agli oggetti della conoscenza, quali che siano. Gli istinti collettivi si sono a…
🔥2👍1
«Da qualche parte, lungo il cammino, avevo perso il passo. Mi ero indebolito. Il mio istinto mi stava abbandonando. Forse avevo commesso il peggiore dei crimini: mi ero civilizzato». [Riddick]
🔥2❤1
Consiglio l’ascolto di questa conferenza sul tema dell’UGUAGLIANZA, che mette a confronto due traiettorie intellettuali provenienti da sponde opposte, ma entrambe ormai difficilmente contenibili entro le rispettive appartenenze originarie. Marco Tarchi, politologo, emerso dalla destra neofascista è stato tra i principali animatori della Nuova Destra italiana. Nel 1994 dichiarò conclusa quell’esperienza, approdando al…
👍2
LIBERTÀ O SICUREZZA? Ciò che Roggero ha compiuto rappresenta l’irruzione violenta della contraddizione sulla quale viviamo: la perdita al contempo della libertà e della sicurezza. Una mia riflessione su IL PENSIERO HARDUO: https://ilpensieroharduo.blogspot.com/2026/07/sul-caso-roggero-sicurezza-o-liberta.html
👍1👏1
LE PIETRE PRIMA DEGLI DÈI Ho dedicato una recensione a GUIDA ALL’EUROPA MEGALITICA di Andrea Anselmo, pubblicata da Passaggio al Bosco nello stesso mese del mio SOTTOSOPRA. Ans è un amico di lunga data e un autore col quale ho condiviso tappe essenziali del mio cammino. Dopo la sua generosa recensione al mio libro, entro nel cuore della sua opera: un volume liminale, nato da oltre vent’anni di esplorazioni tra Dolm…
❤4🔥1
Esattamente dieci anni fa, il 15 luglio 2016, debuttava su Netflix il primo episodio di Stranger Things. Ho visto la serie soltanto nel 2025, ma questa ricorrenza mi ha fatto ripensare alla scena che accese immediatamente il mio interesse, fino a spingermi a dedicarle un libro. Una cosa che, tra l’altro, nel libro non chiarisco, poiché attiene alla sensazione che provai guardandola per la prima volta: che fosse dest…
❤1🔥1
Eccoli, i promotori della società apert@, inclusiv@, tollerant@ e anarchic@, rigorosamente declinata con la @ – superiamo perfino l'asterisco –, icona della turbovirtualizzazione più paranoide. Dopo decenni trascorsi a impartire lezioni contro l'odioh, scoprono con disarmante naturalezza il loro orientamento all'«eliminazione fisica» dell'avversario politico. Salvo poi rifugiarsi nelle solite ciance sulla «provocazi…
❤2👍1
Condivido con grande piacere, una densa riflessione di Andrea Anselmo sul mio saggio SOTTOSOPRA Il mondo dopo Stranger Things tra declino e destino.
🔥2❤1👌1
Scheggia n. 1: estratto da Slavoj Žižek, Dalla tragedia alla farsa]
🔥2
Nasce SCHEGGE HARDUE: frammenti, citazioni e materiali critici dall’archivio de IL PENSIERO HARDUO. Una rubrica IN ESCLUSIVA per il canale Telegram, dove nel tempo troverete anche traduzioni inedite, testi rari e materiali poco reperibili. Condividete con i più hardui tra i vostri contatti. Sotto: PDF allegato.
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ilpensieroharduo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 583,496 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IL PENSIERO HARDUO” (@ilpensieroharduo), 55 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilpensieroharduo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.