Channel
@ilovemichaeljackson0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
368subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001918254190 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ilovemichaeljackson0 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ilovemichaeljackson0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 368 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 364 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 364 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (19 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,255 |
| Reactions total | 199 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
199 reactions across 12 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 97 | 48.7% | |
| custom 5253687739739571963 | 20 | 10.1% | |
| 💋 | 19 | 9.55% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 7.04% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 6.53% | |
| 🍓 | 6 | 3.02% | |
| custom 5875316627280500133 | 5 | 2.51% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 2.51% | |
| custom 5398031677773602818 | 4 | 2.01% | |
| custom 5877534608521696183 | 4 | 2.01% | |
| ☃ | 4 | 2.01% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 2.01% | |
| custom 5397632675311806172 | 1 | 0.503% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.503% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.503% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.503% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 199reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Интересный факт Майкл никогда не носил одежду с молниями без крайней необходимости — звук застёгивающейся молнии вызывал у него необъяснимое раздражение.
❤18🍓6
Signed Vulgär blond.الحب
#вп
Signed Vulgär blond.الحب
🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🎀 "Ищешь Отличный Базовый Архив по Королю Поп Музыки - Майклу Джексону? “ ⏯️ тебе прямо по адресу ¡! 🎀: Весь мт выполнен качественно. 🎀: Фото и видео с концертов. 🎀: Юзабельные стикеры. 🎀: Приятная и удобная подача. 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 @TRUESTMICHAELJACKSON @TRUESTMICHAELJACKSON @TRUESTMICHAELJACKSON
Signed Vulgär blond.الحب
🤩🤩🤩🤩 ✨🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ✨ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🌟 ✨канал с нарезками, культовыми моментами по поп-иконам того, и сегодняшних времён Майкла Джексона 🤩 и Джанет Джексон 🤩 ✨ здесь вы найдете нарезки культовых моментов 🤩, клипов, выступлений 🌟 , награждений 🤩, интервью, любительские видео, видео//фото папарацци, редкие фотографии в хорошем качестве, важную информацию по этим лег…
custom 52536877397395719631
Signed Vulgär blond.الحب
#вп
Signed Vulgär blond.الحب
🌓🎀hat about yesterday?🎀hat about us? 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🤩дравствуй, дорогой читатель! я Элин Вудворд, владелец телеграм канала my.moon.man приглашаю тебя в мой небольшой уголок 🪽 так что же ты найдёшь на моём телеграм канале ? интересные факты, эдиты и фотографии поп-короля Майкла Джексона ну или просто всеми нами любимого Питер Пена https://t.me/mymoonMJ
Signed Vulgär blond.الحب
Джафар Джексон примет участие в фильме «Supermax» вместе с Уиллом Смитом и Аннасофией Робб. 🔻По сюжету, двое агентов ФБР расследуют убийство в самой надежной тюрьме мира. Режиссерское кресло займет Дэвид Гордон Грин, снимавший новый «Хэллоуин». Над сценарием работали Дэвид Уэйл и Дэвид Дж. Розен («Охотники»). ❓Роль Джафара пока не раскрыта, но, по данным Deadline, его персонаж важен для основного сюжета фильма. Ожи…
custom 525368773973957196312❤🔥5💋5custom 53976326753118061721
Signed Vulgär blond.الحب
Интересный факт Однажды Майкл исписал все зеркала гостиничного номера губной помадой, потому что проснулся ночью с готовой мелодией в голове, а рядом не было блокнота
❤23custom 52536877397395719636💋4🔥4🤯4
Signed Vulgär blond.الحب
Редкие фотографии
❤18
Signed Vulgär blond.الحب
https://youtu.be/U2nY1uVplCs?si=RMKnjPUVxcHTkeLA Хочу поделиться с вами этим клипом от фаната Майкла на YouTube.
❤11
Signed Vulgär blond.الحب
#вп
custom 53980316777736028184custom 52536877397395719631
Signed Vulgär blond.الحب
Video, posted without a caption
❤2
Signed Vulgär blond.الحب
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ilovemichaeljackson0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 734,003 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝘔𝘑𝘓𝘖𝘝𝘌” (@ilovemichaeljackson0), 368 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilovemichaeljackson0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.