Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ilovedocs kz

Channel

ilovedocs kz

@ilovedocskz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

126subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003926189953
TypeChannel
Username@ilovedocskz
Created2 May 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ilovedocskz

Growth

126127126.56 August 2026 — 127 subscribers9 August 2026 — 127 subscribers15 August 2026 — 126 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 126–127 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:44126-1
9 Aug 2026, 02:02127no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:47127first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 2 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 36m
Average length
1h 36m

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1155.0%
525.0%
🔥420.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jun 2026, 13:19 UTC110 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Пока основной курс про нейросети в самом разгаре, хотим поделиться с вами прекрасным видео доклада Яна Стригова с Рунетлекс Конф об ИИ-агентах. Ну а если вы хотите глубже погрузиться в эту тему — приходите к нам на трек 10 июня по агентам и вайбкодингу, будем разбираться и тренироваться вместе😌 А еще промокод WEB0805 продолжает действовать!

🔥4

13 May 2026, 10:39 UTC180 viewsread 9 August 2026

Кстати, уже завтра стартует наш курс по нейросетям для юристов 🚀 Открыли чат для участников и начинаем знакомство) Если давно хотели разобраться, как внедрять ИИ в юридическую практику - это отличный момент присоединиться. Для участников вебинара скидка на курс - 10%! Промокод WEB0805

13 May 2026, 10:29 UTC140 viewsread 9 August 2026

Что за «разные модели» внутри ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini и как ими пользоваться Внутри одного сервиса (ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini) может быть несколько моделей. Одни быстрее и дешевле в использовании, другие медленнее и дороже, но лучше справляются со сложными задачами. Рассказываем о различиях: 1. Быстрая модель Instant / Haiku / Fast Как работает: Подходит для простых задач — отвечает быстро, почти не думает, час

11 May 2026, 13:00 UTC130 viewsread 9 August 2026

«Чат делает, а агент сделает» как лейтмотив вебинара по ИИ-агентам Если вы хотели посмотреть что-то про ИИ-агентов в юридической работе, то этот вебинар точно нужно включить в список) Что мы разобрали на вебинаре: – в чем логика команды агентов, где у каждого своя задача – какие по архитектуре команды агентов существуют – как создать команду – какие есть ограничения и как их учитывать в работе Запись и презент

10 May 2026, 13:21 UTC121 viewsread 9 August 2026

Для слушателей из Казахстана: оплата в тенге доступна, просто напишите мне - всё оформим без лишних сложностей! 📩 Написать Алине Сундетовой: @alina_sundetova Если остались вопросы по программе, формату или содержанию - тоже пишите, отвечу лично

10 May 2026, 13:16 UTC131 viewsread 9 August 2026

14 мая стартует 6 поток курса "Нейросети для юриста: от основ к системе" Курс сделан юристами для юристов. Спикеры — практикующие юристы, которые сами используют нейросети в работе каждый день. На курсе вас ждет: 1. Основной блок обучения по основам использования нейросетей – 4 недели Этот блок доступен всем на всех тарифах. Основы-основ! 14 мая – 18 июня 2. Дальше у нас идет ступень по ИИ-агентам и вайб-кодингу

8 May 2026, 17:23 UTC183 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Большой рахмет всем, кто пришел сегодня на вебинар! 🇰🇿 Было приятно разделить с вами все 1,5 часа — вы супер слушатели! Для тех, кто не смог прийти, и для тех, кто хочет пересмотреть, публикуем запись. Презентацию положили в комментарии к этому посту! Таймкоды для удобства: 00:00 — Как изменилось отношение юристов к ИИ за последний год 05:31 — Обзор инструментов 18:58 — Разоблачаем мифы 37:31 — Промпты и контекст 4

👍41

8 May 2026, 06:00 UTC156 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Напоминаем, что сегодня в 18:00 расскажем, как ИИ может стать вашим рабочим инструментом в юрпрактике, а не просто модным экспериментом)

👍2

4 May 2026, 05:54 UTC324 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Добро пожаловать, коллеги! Если вы здесь - значит, вам важно, какой будет ваша юридическая практика в эпоху ИИ. На вебинаре разберём конкретные инструменты: как экономить время, усиливать экспертизу и получать устойчивый результат в работе. 📍Подключиться к вебинару: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81481547387?pwd=MxQY4jCdZiRwLH4IuuY2DaY0oZpP5p.1 🗓 8 мая в 18:00 Спикер: Павел Мищенко 📌 Здесь же после эфира появится зап

👍54

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ilovedocskz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 729,791 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ilovedocs kz” (@ilovedocskz), 126 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilovedocskz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.