Channel
@ilmiy_sarguzasht
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
165subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002165521403 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ilmiy_sarguzasht |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ilmiy_sarguzasht |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 165 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 161 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 159 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 159 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
67 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 25 | 37.3% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 28.4% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 10.4% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 7.46% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 4.48% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.99% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 1.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2025 to 10 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ba'zi Nature jurnallari maqolani taqriz (review) jaryonin ham to'liq chop etar edi (publish). Endi ushbu uslubni Nature ni barcha jurnalalrgi qo'llashni rejalashtiryapti. Bu nima degani? Bitta maqolani bir nechta taqrizchi ko'rib chiqadi va o'z xulosa, taklif va taqrizlarini beradi. Juda ko'p jurnallar o'sha taqrizni sir tutishni afzal ko'radi. Ammo Nature shaffof yo'lni tanladi. Chunki, keng olimlar hamjamiyati maqo…
🔥2
Juda ajoyib post. Bir vaqtlar ham ingiliz tilini o'rganish haqida post yozgan edim. Bizda, juda ko'p yoshlar IELTS ni 8-9 olishga juda berilib ketdi. Agar shu IELTS bilan til yo'nalishga borib o'qisa mayli lekin boshqa sohalarda o'qishadi. Masalan, kimdir Computer Science ga kimdir fizika yana kimdir ijtimoiy fanlarga boradi. Ulardan fan haqida tushinchang bormi deb so'rasangiz IELTS 8 deydi lekin o'zi kirmoqchi bo'l…
👍4🔥1🫡1
Juda ko'p guvohi bo'lganman!
😁3
Ba'zi odamlar bir yilda tugatvoraman deydi. Ha aytganchi, bu O'zbekistonga tegishli emas. O'zbekistonda hamma narsa bo'lishi mumkin.
👏1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣5❤1🌚1😱1
Hozirda PhD da o'qiyotgan universitetim Paris-Saclay ning yangilangan reytingi. QS: 70 THE: 68 ARWU: 13 Lekin fizika bo'yicha reytingi ancha baland ekan: QS: 19 THE: 35 ARWU: 8 Yomonmas. O'tgan yildan bir pog'ona pasayish bor. Lekin Fizika bo'yicha reyting doimgidek baland.
🔥4👍1
Ancha vaqt oldin, bitta Scopus ba'zasiga indekslangan jurnalga maqola yuborgan edim. Taqrizchi (reviewer) lardan biri maqolani adabiyotlar tahlili to'liq emasligini asosiy kamchilik sifatida ko'rsatgan va bir nechta maqolalarga iqtibos berilishi kerakligi talab qilgan edi. Ushbu maqolalarni birma bir ko'rib chiqdim, hammasi bitta muallifga tegishli. Demak taqrizchi o'sha muallif ekan degan xulosaga keldim. Keyin, jur…
👍5🔥3
Photo, posted without a caption
👀1😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁3👍2
Stanfordning muvaffaqiyat bo'yicha tadqiqotlarini natijalariga ko'ra "yaxshi odamlar" 67% kamroq ish haqi oladi va 8 marta ko'proq birovlar o'z manfati yo'lida foydalanishadi.
👍2🔥1
Universitetni bitirayotgan talabalarda darsga qatnashish ta'lim olishdan ko'ra muhimroq degan ko'nikma mavjud bo'ladi. Bunga sabab davomat, o'qituvchilarni davomatni siyosat darajasiga olib chiqishi va darsga qatnashmagan talabaga o'qituvchiga xurmatsizlik qilgandek qarash. Asosiy ko'nikma ta'lim olish bo'lishi kerak edi.
🔥2💯1
Qiziqarli!
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ilmiy_sarguzasht. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ilmiy sarguzasht| Scientific Adventure” (@ilmiy_sarguzasht), 165 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilmiy_sarguzasht.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.