Allahu, čuvaj ga na svakom koraku, podari mu bereketa i sreće, učini njegovo srce smirenim i ispuni ga mirom. Podari mu osmijeh na licu uvijek, olakšaj mu svaki teret, otvori mu vrata dobra i sačuvaj ga od svakog zla. 🥹🤲🏻
❤4🥰1

Channel
@ilmassalaf1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
70subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003923304195 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ilmassalaf1 |
| Description | Adab prije znanja! |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 8 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ilmassalaf1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 70 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:47 | 70 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 August 2026 – 12 September 2026) |
| Views total | 299 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Sept 2026, 15:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
31 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 90.3% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 12 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Allahu, čuvaj ga na svakom koraku, podari mu bereketa i sreće, učini njegovo srce smirenim i ispuni ga mirom. Podari mu osmijeh na licu uvijek, olakšaj mu svaki teret, otvori mu vrata dobra i sačuvaj ga od svakog zla. 🥹🤲🏻
❤4🥰1
„Ako imaš prijatelja koji ti pomaže u pokornosti Allahu, čvrsto se drži njega; jer steći prijatelja je teško, a rastati se od njega je lahko." Imam Šafija, rahimehullah @endelusbalkan
❤1
#Polygynie #Mehrehe Zunächst muss betont werden, dass es sehr viele Männer gibt, die dieser Form der Ehe nicht gerecht werden, sie dennoch praktizieren und so mehr Schaden als Nutzen für sich, ihre Frauen und Familien bringen. Das ist Fakt, entspricht der heutigen Realität und ist ein Grund für die ablehnende Haltung einiger Schwestern. Hier geht es jedoch nicht um das Fehlverhalten einzelner Individuen, sondern um …
👍1
#Polygynie #Mehrehe Im folgenden Beitrag über Polygynie geht es nicht darum, eine bestimmte Form der Ehe hervorzuheben und die andere herunterzustufen. Viel eher dient dieser Beitrag (und die darauf folgenden) der Aufklärung, und das vorwiegend für jene Schwestern, die etwas hassen, was Allāh عز وجل erlaubte und dadurch (unbewusst) in die Falle des Kufr fallen, was in der heutigen Zeit doch sehr verbreitet ist. Dab…
👍1
Rekao je šejh Ebu Ishak el-Huvejni, rahimehullah: „Žena koja u našem vremenu nosi nikab nalikuje ženama Dženneta, jer kada se pokrije, svoju ljepotu ograničava samo na svog muža, pa je niko osim njega ne vidi. Kao što Uzvišeni Allah kaže: ‘Hurije u šatorima skrivene.’ (Er-Rahman, 72) Dakle, čedna i moralna žena nalikuje ženama Dženneta.“
Ibn al-Qayyim, möge Allah ihm barmherzig sein, sagte: „Unterschätze keine kleine Sünde, denn die größten Brände können durch die kleinsten Funken verursacht werden.“ 📚 Al-Fawāʾid, 3/227. Ibnul-Kajjim, Allah mu se smilovao, rekao je: „Ne smatraj mali grijeh beznačajnim, jer najveći požari mogu biti izazvani i najmanjom iskrom.“ 📚 El-Fevaid, 3/227.
Esselamu alejkum ko zeli arapski da nauči svaki dan 15 minuta i ima kviz svaki dan 3 pitanja , mjesečno ispiti sa ocjenom. i na kraju se dobije diploma Upis je u toku, a nastava Počinje 4.9 Evo link za upis: https://ulum.rs/arapski-jezik/
On čuva svoje oči samo za nju , a ona čuva svoju ljepotu samo za njega.
❤5
Wer den Niqab nicht liebt oder ihn nicht akzeptiert, der soll Allah fürchten und sein Herz hinterfragen. Der Niqab steht für Keuschheit, Bescheidenheit und Gehorsam gegenüber Allah. Ihr seid euch nicht bewusst, wie viel Schönheit sich hinter dem Niqab verbirgt … Dort werden Liebe und Schönheit ebenfalls bewahrt nicht für die Blicke aller Menschen, sondern nur für einen einzigen Mann.
❤2
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
Während die meisten Jugendlichen in ihrer Jugend weltliche Vergnügungen genießen Geld, Autos, Ausgehen und all das, was diese Welt zu bieten hat gibt es eine Minderheit, der Allah Rechtleitung schenkt. Es sind diejenigen, die dem Vergänglichen den Rücken kehren und sich auf den Weg des Wissens, des Erlernens der Religion und der Annäherung an Allah begeben.
❤1
Danas, kad musliman traži ženu sa nikabom, mora tražiti onu sa nikabom koja ispravno nosi nikab, jer nikab je došao da sakrije ljepotu žene..
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ilmassalaf1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ilm.as.salaf” (@ilmassalaf1), 70 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilmassalaf1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.