Channel
@ilmanagerdelloro
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
667subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001760687036 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ilmanagerdelloro |
| Created | 13 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ilmanagerdelloro |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 667 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:40 | 668 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 668 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 June 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 776 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
29 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 10 | 34.5% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 24.1% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 20.7% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 6.90% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 3.45% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 3.45% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 3.45% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇺🇸🇯🇵⚡️ TERREMOTO SULLE VALUTE: USA E GIAPPONE INTERVENGONO INSIEME PER SALVARE LO YEN💸 0️⃣1️⃣ Agosto 2026 Il Dipartimento del Tesoro degli Stati Uniti è intervenuto sui mercati valutari acquistando yen. Questa operazione straordinaria è stata eseguita dalla Federal Reserve Bank di New York, attraverso intermediari finanziari come Goldman Sachs e Morgan Stanley, per conto del governo americano. E come l'ha fatta? V…
𝗔𝘃𝗲𝘁𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗶 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗶 𝗱𝗮 𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗮 𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗳𝗮𝗿𝘃𝗶 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗿𝗲. La persona che incontrate vi illustrerà i vantaggi delle polizze (che a voi non servono) e ve ne venderà una. Qui sotto capite perché. Come ci spiegano le organizzazioni sindacali, “𝘓𝘢 𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘢 𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘻𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘢 𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘭’𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘣𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘢, 𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘱𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘰 𝘭𝘦 𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘢. 𝘚𝘪 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘭 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘰 𝘥𝘢 …
Qual è il modo migliore per proteggere i tuoi risparmi dall'inflazione? La risposta ti sorprenderà, perché il modo più sicuro... NON è lasciare i soldi fermi sul conto corrente; NON è investire in BTP che rendono meno dell'inflazione; NON è acquistare immobili e combattere con inquilini o costi di manutenzione. C'è un modo più sicuro e trasparente per proteggere i tuoi risparmi: l'oro fisico certificato. Con I FE…
👍1👏1💯1
Da 5.000 anni l'oro protegge chi lo possiede. Ha attraversato guerre, crisi e svalutazioni... mantenendo il suo valore reale, o aumentandolo. Nessun governo Nessuna banca centrale Nessun algoritmo decide il suo valore. Eppure oggi molti italiani tengono ancora i risparmi fermi sul conto o in BTP che rendono meno dell'inflazione. Ma negli ultimi 20 anni il potere d'acquisto dell'euro è calato del 43%. Mentre nello…
👌1👍1👏1
La verità che molti evitano di dire. Il problema non è il sistema. È che troppe persone hanno smesso di metterlo in discussione. Chi costruisce il proprio futuro non aspetta il momento perfetto. Studia. Sperimenta. Sbaglia. Riparte. Il potere, in qualsiasi settore, appartiene a chi comprende le regole meglio degli altri. Non a chi si limita a seguirle. La vera libertà non arriva quando hai più soldi. Arriva qu…
❤1👍1👏1🤩1
Pensi che investire in oro sia troppo rischioso o troppo costoso? Ragioniamo su una cosa: quanto hai già perso in potere d'acquisto tenendo i risparmi fermi sul conto? Negli ultimi 4 anni l'inflazione ha eroso il 20% del valore dei tuoi risparmi. Nello stesso periodo, l'oro fisico è salito di oltre il 90%. L'oro da investimento non è un costo: è un modo per proteggere quello che hai già, con un asset che puoi tocc…
L'euro funziona, SI o No? L'opinione di Joseph Stiglitz, premio Nobel per l'economia nel 2001. 👑 t.me/ilmanagerdelloro
👏1
Non tutte le persone potranno scegliere oggi di investire insieme a noi. Ma c’è una promessa che possiamo fare. Il 100% dei veneti saranno consapevoli di come si può investire fruttuosamente in oro fisico. Crediamo che ogni persona debba avere, nel proprio territorio, un consulente di riferimento serio, competente e affidabile quando si parla di patrimonio, protezione e futuro. Il nostro obiettivo non è essere ov…
❤2👍1🤩1
Oro o contanti? 👑 t.me/ilmanagerdelloro
👏1
Un momento unico, da non farsi sfuggire. Per qualsiasi informazione contattami pure 🤗 👉@sebbysala
❤1
𝗔 𝘀𝗰𝘂𝗼𝗹𝗮 𝗰𝗶 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗴𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗼 𝗟𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗶 𝗲 𝗹𝗲 𝗴𝘂𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗲. 𝗠𝗮 𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗻𝗼 𝗰𝗶 𝘀𝗽𝗶𝗲𝗴𝗮 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗲́ 𝗻𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝗼𝗯𝗯𝗶𝗮𝗺𝗼 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗹 𝗺𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗼. A scuola si imparano la fotosintesi clorofilliana, le guerre puniche e le equazioni di secondo grado. Ma nessuno spiega come funziona una busta paga, cosa significa indebitarsi o perché risparmiare il 10% di ciò che si guadagna potrebbe fare una grande differenza a 40 anni. L'educazione finanziaria non…
La nostra esclusività ✨ Per noi significa offrire qualcosa di concreto, innovativo e fuori dagli schemi tradizionali. Con IFG Way, il valore del prodotto nasce da un modello basato sul commercio reale, non da attività finanziarie sottostanti. Una scelta trasparente, semplice e orientata alla solidità. L’esclusività si riflette anche nella massima flessibilità: il cliente decide liberamente quante risorse impegnare…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ilmanagerdelloro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 358,575 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Economia Alternativa” (@ilmanagerdelloro), 667 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilmanagerdelloro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.