Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ○ 𝐜𝐜 𝐳𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬: [ 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒈𝒂 ] × [ 𝑭𝒂𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕: 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑼𝒑𝒔𝒊𝒅𝒆 𝒅𝒐𝒘𝒏 ] ○

Channel

○ 𝐜𝐜 𝐳𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬: [ 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒈𝒂 ] × [ 𝑭𝒂𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕: 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑼𝒑𝒔𝒊𝒅𝒆 𝒅𝒐𝒘𝒏 ] ○

@illuga_and_faelight

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

146subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004307883710
TypeChannel
Username@illuga_and_faelight
Created8 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/illuga_and_faelight

Growth

1462 Sept 2026, 23:30 — 146 subscribers3 Sept 2026, 02:37 — 146 subscribers2 Sept 2026, 23:303 Sept 2026, 02:37
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 145–147 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 02:37146no change
2 Sept 2026, 23:30146first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
162.3%
avg views ÷ 146 subscribers
Avg views / post
237
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held5 (8 July 202624 August 2026)
Views total474
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

42 reactions across 3 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1842.9%
🕊1126.2%
🔥511.9%
🍓37.14%
😢37.14%
🎉12.38%
👎12.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC182 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @hoyo_paperzinesPhoto

⋆˙⟡ Комиссия Тэнрё рада сообщить, что определилась со списком смельчаков, которым предстоит пройти сквозь гром и молнии, чтобы запечатлеть все красоты Инадзумы. ⛩ Художник обложки⛩ LivakaG ⚡Художники ⚡ белая акварель Выхухоль! виня Енот в зеленых шортах звездюк кашкыштан ЛоМ Ми Эр Океаны тумана Полина Север хлеп akkodm Amber Regina blackberryblood Celindie charliem ewarienn Flicia geoqeka Honey*Bunny KARDSI kir

🍓3🎉1

22 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC292 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

СООБЩАЕМ О ПРОДЛЕНИИ НАБОРОВ! Просьба прочитать до конца! В связи с некоторыми непредвиденными обстоятельствами вынуждены продлить набор до 13.09.2026 г. И это значит, что у вас есть ещё время для того, чтобы решиться подать заявку к нам ✨ Также предлагаем вам в комментариях к посту покидать художников и писателей, которых вы бы хотели увидеть в проектах "Faelight:TUD" и "Illuga"! Укажите ник, ссылку на творческую

🕊11🔥5😢3👎1

29 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTC378 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @BojackHorsemanZinPhoto

▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️ НАБОРЫ НЕ ВЛЕЗЛИ В ПОСТ, ОНИ ЗДЕСЬ Дорогие друзья! Хотим с радостью сообщить, что предзаказы на наш зин по Коню Боджеку открыты!🌟 - А5, мягкая обложка КБС - 32 автора и более 40 страниц - разнообразный мерч: брелковая гача, таблетницы, телевизор и даже брелок- cd диск! Приобрести мерч отдельно от зина можно, если сумма заказа без учёта доставки составляет минимум 800р. Чтобы приобрести зин

19 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,910 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

«ᥴⲃᥱⲧ 𐔤ⲿᥱ 𐔏𐔖ρυⲧ, υ᥈᥈𐔤𐔏υ, υ ⲏᥲⲙ 𐔖ᥴⲧᥲ᥈ᥴя ⲃᥴᥱ𐔏𐔖 ɯᥲ𐔏, ɥⲧ𐔖ⳝы ⲇ𐔖ⳝρᥲⲧьᥴя ⲇ𐔖 ⲏᥱ𐔏𐔖 ᥴⲕⲃ𐔖ⳅь ⲙᥱⲧᥱ᥈ь» 🔦🕯🔦🕯🔦🕯🔦🕯🔦🕯🔦🕯🔦🕯 Приветствуем вас в нашем отряде, скорее принимайте участие в наборах в зины "Illuga" и "Faelight: The Upside Down"! Наборы художников и писателей продлятся по 23.08.2026 г. (включительно), вся информация в группе ВК Заявку можно подать ТОЛЬКО в группе ВК! И не забудьте ознакомиться с правилами ♥️ 🔦🕯🔦🕯🔦🕯🔦🕯🔦🕯🔦🕯🔦

18

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @illuga_and_faelight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“○ 𝐜𝐜 𝐳𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬: [ 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒈𝒂 ] × [ 𝑭𝒂𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕: 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑼𝒑𝒔𝒊𝒅𝒆 𝒅𝒐𝒘𝒏 ] ○” (@illuga_and_faelight), 146 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/illuga_and_faelight.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.