Rep 🎶 🎙️ https://t.me/iliatopuria_matador

Channel
🇪🇸 Ilia Topuria 🇬🇪
@iliatopuria_matador
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
129subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 25 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002463653899 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iliatopuria_matador |
| Description | Ism: Ilia Topuria 🌹 Sobiq UFC 2 vazn chempioni 🏆 Vatani: Ispaniya 🇪🇸 Tavallud topgan sanai: 27.01.1997 ❤ Vazni: 70 kg (jang uchun) 🔥 Bo'yi: 170 cm ⬆️ Rekord: 17 - 1 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iliatopuria_matador |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 129 | no change |
| 25 Sept 2026, 12:47 | 129 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 136.4%
- avg views ÷ 129 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 176
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 June 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 528 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 223
- Videos
- 203
- Links
- 319
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 35m 50s
- Average length
- 4m 29s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
86 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍌 | 24 | 27.9% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 23.3% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 9.30% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 8.14% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 6.98% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 5.81% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 4.65% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 3.49% | |
| 😡 | 2 | 2.33% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.33% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 2.33% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.16% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 1.16% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🥊🇺🇸Jastin Geytji Iliya Topuriyaning navbatdagi raqibi haqida «Uning ishi bitgan!» 🗣️U juda texnik jangchi... U bilan keyingi jang qiladigan odamning ishi bitgan... Aytmoqchi bo‘lganim shu, xolos... Men hech qachon jangchi haqida bekorga gapirmayman, chunki u la’nati darajada kuchli!» ✍️Topuriyaning mag‘lubiyatsiz rekordiga nuqta qo‘ygan inson oxir-oqibat uning eng katta maqtovchilaridan biriga aylandi. Ko‘rinishid…
🥊🇪🇸Ilia Topuriya ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda: 🗣️Shu vaqt davomida men haqimda axmoqona gaplar gapirgan va meni hisobdan chiqargan barcha masxarabozlarga — mana, men shu yerdaman. Endi kimda jur’at borligini ko‘ramiz. Qo‘llab-quvvatlaganingiz uchun barchangizga rahmat. Keyingi safar Jastinning qo‘lqoplarini tekshirtirishlariga ishonch hosil qilaman, toki u ichiga biror g‘alati narsa solib qo‘ymasin. Tez orada ko‘rishamiz. …
«Iliya Topuriyaning 2005-yildagi videosi» Xorijliklar o'zimizni o'zbek bolani Iliya Topuriya deb o'ylashmoqda. ) 🇪🇸🇺🇿
🤣4❤1🫡1😁1
🚨 Ilia Topuriyaning Jastin Geydjiga qarshi og‘ir mag‘lubiyatidan keyingi birinchi ommaviy ko‘rinishi — UFC turniri Oq uyda bo‘lib o‘tgandi. 👉 Ko‘rinishidan, u juda tez tiklanmoqda.
⚡️ Topuriyaning tiklanishi yaxshi davom etmoqda va u yil oxirigacha oktagonga qaytishi kutilmoqda. 👀 🗣️ Iliyaning murabbiyi: "Har kuni uning ahvoli yaxshilanmoqda. Yuzidagi shish va ko'karishlar deyarli yo'qoldi. Shifokorlar siniq joy siljimaganini aytishmoqda. U 6–8 hafta ichida bitishi kerak. Shundan so'ng kurash va to'liq mashg'ulotlarga qaytishi uchun yana kamida 2–3 oy kerak bo'ladi."
❤3🍌2
🗓 🔙 Bundan roppa-rosa bir yil oldin Topuriya Oliveyrani nokautga uchratib, UFC yengil vazn toifasi chempioniga aylangandi! 🥊 📌 O‘sha g‘alaba Topuriyaning faoliyatidagi eng muhim lahzalardan biriga aylangan va uni ikki vazn toifasida chempion bo‘lish yo‘lidagi navbatdagi bosqichga olib chiqqan edi. https://t.me/iliatopuria_matador
🏆2
🥊🎙Jo Rogan Oq Uyda bo‘lib o‘tgan Iliya Topuriya va Jastin Geytji jangini MMA tarixidagi eng buyuk jang deb atadi! 🗣️Oq Uyda o‘tkazilgan UFC turnirining asosiy jangi tarixdagi eng buyuk jang bo‘ldi. Tom ma’noda, bu barcha davrlarning eng zo‘r jangi edi, chunki unda 6 ga 1 koeffitsiyent bilan autsayder hisoblangan Jastin Geytji g‘alaba qozondi.”
🔥2❤1💯1
🇪🇸 Ilia Topuria hali qaytadi va Jastin, Arman va boshqalarni kallasini oladi 👊😂 https://t.me/iliatopuria_matador
❤3🍌3⚡1
⚡️ Jastin Geyji Ilia Topuriyaga revansh bermoqchi emas 🗣️ «Ilia revansh olmaydi. Urinib ko‘rishi mumkin, ammo bunga erisha olmaydi. U stulda o‘tirgan holda jangni davom ettirishdan voz kechdi, men uni jang davomida ikki marta nokdaunga tushirdim. Yana nima qilishim kerak? ❌ Mening keyingi raqibim u bo‘lmaydi. Borib Peddi Pimblett yoki shunga o‘xshash jangchi bilan urishsin.»
👍3😡2
🕺😄 🎶
🍌3❤2😁2🤣1🆒1
🥊🇦🇺Aleksandr Volkanovski: “Topuriya revansh jangida Geytjini mag‘lub etadi!” 🗣️Menimcha, agar Iliya kerakli xulosalarni chiqarsa va to‘g‘ri jang rejasini tanlasa, u revanshda g‘alaba qozonadi. Agar u bu safar bunchalik shoshilmasa, o‘zi uchun qulay masofada ishlasa va odatda qiladigan ishlarini bajarsa — ya'ni raqibiga aqlli tuzoqlar qo‘ysa — oxir-oqibat o‘z imkoniyatini topadi. Menimcha, aynan ortiqcha tajovuzkorl…
🔥3🍌2🏆1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iliatopuria_matador. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇪🇸 Ilia Topuria 🇬🇪” (@iliatopuria_matador), 129 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iliatopuria_matador.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.