Channel
@iksi_reality
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
69subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002500342287 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iksi_reality |
| Created | Between 1 January 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iksi_reality |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 69 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 64 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:20 | 64 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
61 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 35 | 57.4% | |
| 💯 | 22 | 36.1% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2025 to 6 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iksi_reality. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 August 2025 to 6 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
А вы будете скучать по ИКСА́М?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Прощайте, ИКСЫ́! Название ИКСЫ́ появилось не случайно. Иксы́ — с ударением на последний слог — в языке бизнес-консалтинга означают кратное увеличение оборота или прибыли. Знак умножения «Х» со временем лексикализировался и стал самостоятельным термином. Он пришёл из корпоративного менеджмента, где обозначал кратный рост метрик в целом. Из консалтинга выражение перешло в инфобизнес, где стало вау-показателем эффекти…
🔥4
В ИКСАХ нет безличных текстов без авторской глубины. За каждой формулировкой стою я — автор, Даниил Пилипюк, — и мой конкретный опыт. У меня за спиной тридцать лет в бизнесе, управлении и полтора десятка в консалтинге. Но ничего из этого не превращается в готовые ответы и универсальные рецепты. Потому что это мой опыт и мои навыки — они индивидуальны, уникальны и для любого другого человека будут работать совсем ина…
💯4
ИКСЫ – бизнес-реалити pinned «А как вы читаете контент ИКСОВ?»
Если у того, кто пытается вам помочь, есть метод, помощь не может состоять из случайных советов или накидывания «пользы». Метод – это всегда путь. Разрозненные куски полезного, даже если они иногда дают опору, в потоке предпринимательских ситуаций и проблем, больше напоминают платформы в игре Super Mario: можно прыгать от одной к другой, но траектория всё равно превращается в линейную задачу – любой ценой дойти до к…
🔥2
Новая неделя в ИКСАХ не начинается с внезапно обрушивающегося на подписчика шума и новостей после затишья в выходные. Обычные каналы создаются из необходимости что-то сказать, продать или заработать. Логика их наполнения проста: привлечь больше целевой аудитории и её внимания. В ИКСАХ всё иначе. ИКСЫ — инструмент, метод и механика в одном флаконе. Здесь гораздо важнее другое — сохранять пространство для размышления…
🔥4
А как вы читаете контент ИКСОВ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто следит за ИКСА́МИ внимательно, уже, возможно, заметил: контент в ИКСА́Х идёт недельным циклом. Так сложилось, потому что серии сезона выходят раз в неделю. Но за этим есть и вторая, более важная задача – связанная логика недели, смысловая дуга. Канал ИКСОВ – это не поток информации, а пространство изменений: даже простое наблюдение может запустить значимые сдвиги в бизнесе и жизни. Для этого нужно, чтобы у чело…
🔥2🤝1
Услышал критику: «тексты слишком рваные – их пишет искусственный интеллект». Нет 🙂 Пишу я. И пишу так, чтобы в каждом тексте было не меньше двух смысловых уровней. Иначе невозможно. 🤷 Каждый идёт по своему этапу предпринимательской эволюции, и писать односложно – значит лишить кого-то возможности увидеть важное. Каждый берёт то, что сейчас ему понятно и полезно. А если вы замечаете смысловой разрыв – поздравляю. Э…
💯4
Великолепный Кристофер Уокен и Fatboy Slim — всего за четыре минуты показывают то, о чём я так старательно рассказывал вам целую неделю ))
🔥4🤣1
Победа или кризис? Лекарство или отрава? Спокойствие или тревога? В подкасте «Ничего нового не делал» разбираем, как одно и то же событие снаружи может выглядеть успехом, а внутри — вести в тупик. Смотреть ИКСЫ на: RuTube | YouTube | Vk-видео
🔥3🤔1
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iksi_reality. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вы будете скучать по ИКСА́М?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А как вы читаете контент ИКСОВ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2025 to 6 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,225,005 of 1,629,419 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПРОКАКТУСЫ БИЗНЕСА” (@iksi_reality), 69 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iksi_reality.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.