Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Суд и судьба Васильева, Пучкова и подельников

@ikakprostoexecution

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

267subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002420296233
TypeChannel
Username@ikakprostoexecution
DescriptionКанал посвящен информированию общественности о ходе процессов в судах и правоохранительных органах над группой блоггеров вокруг Пучкова-Васильева.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ikakprostoexecution

Growth

2677 Aug 2026, 15:09 — 267 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:00 — 267 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:098 Aug 2026, 09:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 266–268 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:00267no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:09267first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.0%
avg views ÷ 267 subscribers
Avg views / post
134
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held11 (21 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,069
Reactions total31
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
148
Videos
52
Links
145

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
30s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

43 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1534.9%
🔥1330.2%
👍818.6%
🤡49.30%
👏12.33%
💩12.33%
🤮12.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ikakprostoexecution. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC45 views9 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ivanovproducer

По итогам дебатов Стаса со Жмилем Стасу опять запретили меня упоминать. Как видите после криков про крышу, соловьевых, российские суды - уже первый выигранный иск даёт такие неплохие результаты. Стас проиграл дело и в апелляции и в кассации. В кассационную инстанцию от лица миллионера Стаса даже никто не явился. Пришло время экономить деньги, хехе. В арбитражный суд, по другому делу, также со стороны Васильева ни

🔥7🤡1🤮1

3 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC72 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @maddysontg

За зародыша фасольки уже началась битва между жмилем и какайпростом. Вот уж действительно в интернете больше нечего обсуждать, значит. Но обычно это затишье перед бурей.

🤣4

25 Jul 2026, 20:52 UTC172 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @podsos_clubPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

25 Jul 2026, 20:52 UTC194 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ivanovproducer

Кино уже можно снимать. А потом юрич съел ховыча :)

17 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC192 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @IvanovproducerVideo

Когда очередной голый лысый перец на полу, будет дрожащим голосом представляться "Жмилевский Владислав Дмитриевич" помните, уважаемые зрители. Не продюсер Иванов заставлял его оскорблять память погибших и раненых. Не я силой пихал в него деньги за контент, который нарушает законы РФ. Все это Владислав Жмилевский сделал сам. И как сейчас говорят про Стаса айкакпросто, а раньше говорили про Пучкова - "надо же, похо

🤣3👍1👏1💩1🤡1

17 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC145 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @IvanovproducerVideo

Российский пропагандист Илья Ремесло был задержан в РФ. На опубликованных кадрах его уложили лицом в пол, потребовали расставить ноги шире и силой убрали руку от лица. По словам адвоката, Ремесло доставят в Москву для проведения следственных действий и избрания меры пресечения.

🔥1🤡1

17 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTC138 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @apwagnerPhoto

Продолжайте работу. Быть добру!

🤣2🤡1

16 Jul 2026, 20:20 UTC111 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ivanovproducer

Пишут, что Жмиль допился до угроз слить правоохранительным органам данные собственных донатеров, с чем я всех и поздравляю. Как там с осуждением деанонов? Что слышно?

🤣6

5 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC184 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @IvanovproducerPhoto

Сегодня прочитал, что к ответственности привлекли Веронику Степанову, ещё одного персонажа, который построил карьеру на оскорблениях людей. Присудили 250 тысяч рублей компенсации, что неплохо, в комментариях пользователи пишут, что она уже все потерла. Интернет деятели с удивлением встречают реальную жизнь и последствия своих действий. Отрадно смотреть.

👍4🔥1

25 Jun 2026, 14:53 UTC207 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @IvanovproducerPhoto

Сегодня, 25 июня, кассационный суд отказал в жалобах Станиславу Васильеву, известному как блоггер АйКакПросто. Очередные сотни тысяч, потраченные на того же успешного адвоката, потрачены с потрясающим результатом. В заседание со стороны Васильева никто не явился, что отдельно меня развеселило. Пожелаем Стасу занести еще денег за дальнейшие бесполезные попытки обжаловать справедливое решение суда :) и также успешно

🔥4👍1

21 Jun 2026, 18:46 UTC168 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ivanovproducer

https://youtu.be/sHzoqGB3EmA https://youtu.be/sHzoqGB3EmA https://youtu.be/sHzoqGB3EmA Да начнется безудержное веселье. Отправить мемы на стрим|Подпишись на новый ютуб канал|Донат из России|Донат из-за рубежа|Бусти и архив стримов|Написать Продюсеру|Беспощадный чат

👍2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ikakprostoexecution. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Суд и судьба Васильева, Пучкова и подельников” (@ikakprostoexecution), 267 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ikakprostoexecution.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.