Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ИИшка Чики-Пики

@iishkacp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

72subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004428025873
TypeChannel
Username@iishkacp
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 1 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iishkacp

Growth

7274737 August 2026 — 74 subscribers7 August 2026 — 73 subscribers9 August 2026 — 73 subscribers14 August 2026 — 72 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 72–74 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:1372-1
9 Aug 2026, 22:1673no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:3573-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:3174first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
102.0%
avg views ÷ 72 subscribers
Avg views / post
73.5
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total955
Reactions total68
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4240.8%
🔥2625.2%
🤣1817.5%
109.71%
😢43.88%
👎10.971%
😍10.971%
😐10.971%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC23 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Думаю за отзыв сойдет: PS: Юр, все выглядит как кайф и другой уровень управления документацией. 🚀🔥 Сорян за скептицизм. Я пока не получу реальное применение, чересчур скептичен и перестраховываюсь

🔥5

9 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC28 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Друзья, если кто пользуется Claude не ниже max, то проверьте ~/.claude/settings.json Если в нем модель сохранена как claude-fable-5[1m] (вариант с 1M-контекстом), проверка прав не совпадает с базовой моделью и ложно требует кредиты. Замена на "claude-fable-5" убирает дефект — при этом у Fable 5 контекст 1M и так является значением по умолчанию, так что суффикс ничего не добавляет, вы ничего не потеряете.

🔥4

4 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC56 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я прям с ноги ворвался в тему с ИИшкой и сопутствующими, но меня не покидает чувство, что это как будто пердящий гарью трактор едет по блестящему хрустальному мосту😳 Он или доедет до конца моста или навернется в пропасть вместе с мостом. И если честно, в первый вариант развития событий я верю меньше, чем во второй ☠️ ▪️Инвесторы все чаще задаются вопросом «когда начнется отдача от их вложений» ▪️Бизнес наигрался и

👍5🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC52 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Заметили, что в последнее время основной формат документов, используемый почти повсеместно, стал markdown🤖 Это те самые файлы .md, которые в большинстве случаев формирует ИИшка. Сам формат придумали Джон Грубер (техно-блоггер) и Аарон Шварц (программист) аж в 2002 году 😳, то бишь почти четверть века назад. И в 2004 году, в очередной бум после-доткомовской лихорадки, этот формат стал очень популярным. Во-первых из-за

👍5😍1

31 Jul 2026, 07:06 UTC62 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, расскажите пожалуйста как вы работаете на прошках (20ти долларовых тарифах)? Это скрин через полтора часа после того, как мне пришлось час ждать возобновления 5ти часового лимита 😬

😢31👎1

28 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC117 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Чем отличается Opus от Fable Opus: говорит что нужно сделать, где какие настройки поправить и т.д. Делаю - плохо получается Fable: Google заблокировал сторонний scope для OAuth-клиента clasp (он верифицирован только под свои права). Ничего настраивать не нужно: пойду другим путём, через сам Apps Script проекта — задеплою временный веб-мост (doGet/doPost) в контейнерный скрипт таблицы, для этого прав clasp хватает.

🤣31

28 Jul 2026, 09:13 UTC99 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Видали наверно, что вышел Opus 5 ? Если что, предыдущий опус был 4.8, видать решили 4.9 пропустить. Ну да фиг с ним, с пробелом, расскажу что я узнал – а вы дополните пожалуйста 🤗 Аналогично ChatGPT от OpenAI, у которого есть семейство Sol (флагман) - Terra (повседневка) - Luna (дешман), у Claude от Anthropic есть свой симметричный класс Opus - Sonnet — Haiku. По бенчмаркам они прям ноздря в ноздрю, а друг другу мам

👍3

27 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC97 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Каждое утро заново объясняете AI, чем занимаетесь? 🤯 Контекст проекта размазан по чатам и Notion, документы устаревают, а ChatGPT выдаёт общие слова — потому что у проекта нет единой памяти. «Управление проектом через репозиторий: Cursor + GitHub» — три практических занятия о том, как эту память создать. Без кода: GitHub здесь — не про программирование, а про порядок и историю решений. За 3 онлайн-занятия (~2 часа)

👍3🔥3

20 Jul 2026, 11:36 UTC97 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Уже небось слышали новость, за то что Moonshot AI выпустила супер крутую Kimi K3, которая клоду и гпт просто токен порвала🤖 Причем на халяву! Не спешите отключать подписку. Тут есть пара нюансов, которые надо учитывать. ▪️Во-первых, хялява отменяется🤨. Хоть в интернете писали, что модель бесплатная - тарифы практически идентичные мировым лидерам. Даже пробной херни как у флагманов нет. Понятно, что Fable и Sol на б

👍5😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iishkacp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

Ребят, как вам контент на канале?

  1. Сложно50%
  2. Не интересно0%
  3. Норм50%
  4. Свой ответ в комментариях0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 865,259 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ИИшка Чики-Пики” (@iishkacp), 72 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iishkacp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.