Channel
@iioua
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
800subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001461641014 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iioua |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iioua |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 12:41 | 800 | -5 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 805 | +5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 800 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 799 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:25 | 801 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 807 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 807 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
188 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 146 | 77.7% | |
| 🍓 | 38 | 20.2% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iioua. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
لا طريق يأخذني إليك،وكلُّ الطرقِ التي سلكتُها انتهت بي إلى مزيدٍ من الغياب ، كُلما ظننتُ أنني اقتربتُ منك،اكتشفتُ أنني كنتُ أقتربُ من وهمٍ آخر،وأنَّ المسافاتِ التي بيننا لا تُقاسُ بالخطوات فقط،بل بما يعجز القلبُ عن بلوغه — سجاد عطيه
❤11
عليك أن تتقبّل الحقيقة، حين تُصبح الأوهام أكثر قسوةً من الواقع — سجاد عطيه
❤7
إنها روحي أُشبِّهها بقطعةِ قماشٍ رثَّة، مرَّت بأيدٍ كثيرة يدُ الوقت، ويدُ الخيبة، ويدُ الانتظار، حتى فقدتْ شكلَها الأول التي لمْ يعد فيها موضعٌ لم يترك عليه الألمُ أثرًا — سجاد عطيه
❤13
كُلما اتسع الأُفق ضاقت الكلِمات ..
❤9
Video, posted without a caption
🕊4
File, posted without a caption
🍓2
File, posted without a caption
❤3
ما زِلتُ أشعرُ بك في كلِّ شيء، حتى الأشياء التي لم تعرفك يومًا تُجيد أن تُعيدني إليك — سجاد عطيه
❤13
File, posted without a caption
❤5
سأتذكّرها جيدًا... تلك الابتسامة التي كانت تُشبه صباحَ أحدِ أيّامِ ديسمبر سأتذكّرها جيدًا طريقتكِ في إخماد الحرائق التي كانت تشتعل في صدري سأتذكّرها جيدًا كلماتكِ الدافئة، وهي تُرمّم ما كانت الأيام تُفسده في داخلي سأتذكّرها جيدًا ضحكتكِ التي كانت تُزيح عن روحي ثِقل العالم سأتذكّرُ جيدًا كلَّ الأشياء الصغيرة التي لم تكن تعرفين أنها كانت تعني لي العالم.. — سَجاد عطيه
❤14
Photo, posted without a caption
🍓5
في داخلي تمرُّ جميعُ فصولِ السنة في الصيفِ أحترقُ حتى آخرِ رماد وفي الشتاءِ أتيبَّسُ من فرطِ البرد وفي الخريفِ تتساقطُ منّي الأشياءُ التي أثقلتني ثم يأتي الربيعُ، الذي أُزهر فيه بصيغةٍ لا تشبهني بالأمس — سجاد عطيه
❤14
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iioua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مُنْتصَف” (@iioua), 800 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iioua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.