10 May 2026, 11:43 UTC870 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker
Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel
info alford
@iinfoalford
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003632631643 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iinfoalford |
| Created | 29 December 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iinfoalford |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 12 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:49 | 12 | first reading |
Engagement
3 posts held, back to 29 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
35 reactions across 1 post, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5404456600956075028 | 8 | 22.9% | |
| custom 5192789643262724017 | 7 | 20.0% | |
| custom 5327931828613430816 | 5 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5404743126814330280 | 5 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5407066480783159544 | 4 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5406637379190551224 | 3 | 8.57% | |
| custom 5197301042550697183 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| custom 5190681540169864797 | 1 | 2.86% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 10 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
10 May 2026, 11:41 UTC855 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video
𝐂𝐀𝐋𝐋 𝐌𝐄 —𝐅𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐀𝐋𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐃 ✔️ 🤎 𝐓𝐀𝐊3𝐍 👍 𝐀𝐍𝐎𝐍 🔒 🪩𝐂𝐑𝐀𝐒𝐇 𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 🤩𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐊𝐄𝐑🔪 ⚡𝐎𝐖𝐍𝐄𝐑 👋 𝐓𝐎𝐏 😘 𝐋𝐎𝐎𝐊 𝐀𝐓 𝐌𝐘 𝐖𝐎𝐍𝐃𝐄𝐑𝐅𝐔𝐋 𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐒𝐎𝐍𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐓𝐘 — 𝐈𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐒𝐀𝐆𝐄 🖤 𝐌𝐁𝐓𝐈 — 𝐈𝐍𝐅𝐏 𝐁-𝐃𝐀𝐘 26.03 𝐈 𝐖𝐀𝐒 𝐍𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑 𝐌𝐄𝐀𝐍𝐓 𝐓𝐎 𝐁𝐄 𝐋𝐈𝐊𝐄 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐘𝐎𝐍𝐄. 🌟 > أجمل ما في الحياة أن تجد حبك الحقيقي، تمنحه مكانه في قلبك، ولا تنسى في طريق حبك له أن تمنح نفسك الحب والاهتمام الذي تستحقه في كل يوم. 𝐊𝐄𝐄𝐏 𝐌𝐄 𝐈𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐃𝐎𝐋𝐋𝐇𝐎𝐔𝐒𝐄, 𝐃𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐒𝐄𝐃 𝐔𝐏, 𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐅𝐄𝐂𝐓, 𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐒𝐄𝐃 𝐔𝐏 🌟
custom 54044566009560750288custom 51927896432627240177custom 53279318286134308165custom 54047431268143302805custom 54070664807831595444custom 54066373791905512243custom 51973010425506971832custom 51906815401698647971
29 Dec 2025, 14:40 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @iinfoalford. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 352,743 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“info alford” (@iinfoalford), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iinfoalford.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.