Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

II

@iimain

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

196subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002419813453
TypeChannel
Username@iimain
DescriptionИИ и диджитал-маркетинг: автоматизация, работа с LLM, создание контента и оптимизация процессов.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 13 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/iimain

Growth

1967 Aug 2026, 13:53 — 196 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:45 — 196 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:538 Aug 2026, 11:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 195–197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 11:45196no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:53196first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
21
Videos
2
Links
36

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
58s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3167.4%
817.4%
🔥715.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2024 to 27 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Dec 2025, 17:19 UTC409 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://claude.ai/alex 50% на PRO план, скидка будет работать 3 месяца, в любой момент можно отключить.

👍1

7 Dec 2025, 05:39 UTC345 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

6. Если вывод вызывает сильную эмоцию — проверьте его дважды Эмоции ускоряют выводы. А ускоренные выводы почти всегда ошибочны. Не бороться с эмоцией — достаточно её отметить: “Сейчас это вызывает у меня реакцию — значит нужно перепроверить рассуждение.” 7. Используйте внешний контекст Псевдологика замыкается на узком наборе данных. Контекст расширяет картину и делает рассуждение устойчивым. Приём: Задайте себе три в

👍3

6 Dec 2025, 05:48 UTC272 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

3. Используйте принцип операциональности Если мысль не ведёт к действию, её нужно уточнить. Логическое рассуждение ценно только тогда, когда оно даёт: - критерий, - правило, - действие, - прогноз. Всё остальное — абстракции, которые легко превращаются в псевдологику. 4. Проверяйте цепочку рассуждений на разрывы Псевдологика держится на: скрытых допущениях, пропущенных связках, нелогичных переходах от причины к следс

👍2

5 Dec 2025, 07:39 UTC226 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

1. Разделяйте факты и интерпретации Факт — наблюдаемое, измеряемое, проверяемое. Интерпретация — вывод, который мы делаем о факте. Большинство ошибок происходит именно здесь: люди спорят не о фактах, а о собственных выводах, не замечая этого. Приём: Записывайте ситуацию в формате: Что произошло? (факт) Что я думаю об этом? (интерпретация) 2. Ищите первопричину, а не подтверждение Человеческий мозг автоматически ищет

👍2

4 Dec 2025, 07:32 UTC229 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как избавиться от псевдологики В работе с информацией часто встречается одно скрытое препятствие — псевдологика. Это когда рассуждение выглядит убедительным, но построено на неверных предпосылках, эмоциональных допущениях или автоматических установках мозга. Псевдологика особенно опасна тем, что она незаметно маскируется под рациональность. Далее будет серия постов описывающая структурированный метод, который помог

👍2

5 Aug 2025, 09:09 UTC449 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dataflowwPhoto

База по Machine Learning и AI тут 👩‍💻 Data Flow

👍1

25 Jun 2025, 17:21 UTC558 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @inite_aiPhoto

СТАЖИРОВКА В INITE — ПУТЬ В КОМАНДУ INITE — компания нового поколения: мы создаём решения на основе искусственного интеллекта и современных веб-технологий, налаживаем автоматизацию рабочих процессов. Строим прототипы. Воплощаем идеи. Развиваем проекты. Мы объявляем набор на стажировку! Для кого: соискатели от 16 до 25 лет, готовые думать и действовать, развиваться быстрее конкурентов. Что мы предлагаем: настоящий

22 Mar 2025, 19:08 UTC864 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://habr.com/ru/articles/893356/ - отличнейшая сборка RAG системы.

👍3

3 Nov 2024, 10:46 UTC≈1,360 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://github.com/mahseema/awesome-ai-tools - огромная подборка разнообразных ИИ сервисов из разных областей. Обязательно выделите время чтобы пролистать весь список, точно найдете для себя что-то полезное.

🔥7👍21

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iimain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“II” (@iimain), 196 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iimain.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.