Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 42 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 343–354 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 11:57
344
-1
10 Sept 2026, 09:39
345
-4
31 Aug 2026, 21:53
349
-1
24 Aug 2026, 04:15
350
-2
16 Aug 2026, 02:09
352
-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:46
353
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:30
353
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 25s
Average length
1m 48s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
107 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
61
57.0%
❤
19
17.8%
👍
16
15.0%
🤔
5
4.67%
⚡
2
1.87%
👨💻
2
1.87%
🤯
2
1.87%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 9 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ii_prosto_bayazitov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 February 2026 to 9 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💬 ChatGPT пишет посты за тебя (Часть 2)
Если ты просто пишешь:
«Напиши пост про бизнес» — будет мусор.
Но если задать структуру — получаешь почти готовый текст 👇
2. Генерация поста за 1 минуту
Напиши пост на тему [тема] для [платформа], аудитория: [описание].
Структура:
— цепляющий заголовок
— ввод с проблемой
— 3–5 пунктов с примерами
— вывод + призыв к действию
Стиль: [разговорный / экспертный]
Добавь конкрет…
💬 5 промптов, которые превращают ChatGPT в контент-завод (Часть 1)
Большинство используют ChatGPT «на глаз»
👉 спросил — получил текст — пошёл дальше
Но если дать ему правильную задачу, он начинает работать как команда из 3 человек.
Вот первый промпт 👇
1. Контент-план на 30 дней
Просто вставляешь и получаешь готовую стратегию:
Разработай контент-план на 30 дней для [ниша], ориентированный на аудиторию [описани…
🤖 Я пропал на неделю… и вот что понял
Честно.
Я не писал сюда почти неделю.
И за это время поймал одну мысль:
ИИ не работает, если им не пользоваться регулярно.
Пока используешь каждый день —
есть идеи, скорость, результат.
Перестаёшь —
и как будто откат назад.
За эту неделю я тестировал одну связку:
👉 ИИ + реальный бизнес
Смотрел, можно ли с помощью ИИ:
— быстрее делать контент
— находить людей
— запускать простые п…
Хочу прокачать свой канал и попасть в экосистему роста — ДвижON!
Это не курс и не марафон.
Это среда, где реально растёт аудитория через связи и коллаборации.
💡 Формула роста:
Первые 10 дней → гарантировано +100 подписчиков через новую модель High-Level нетворкинга
Дальше → масштабирование через механики роста до 1000 подписчиков и больше
Здесь каждый участник получает живых подписчиков через реальные действия:
•…
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤖 Интересно узнать
ИИ сейчас везде.
ChatGPT, Qwen, Grok, Claude, Midjourney…
Но мне стало интересно:
какой ИИ люди реально используют чаще всего?
👇 Проголосуйте в опросе.
🤝 Давайте познакомимся
В канале уже 500+ человек.
Но есть странная вещь.
Мы читаем посты друг друга,
но почти ничего не знаем о людях здесь.
А среди вас могут быть:
— предприниматели
— специалисты
— эксперты
— люди с интересными проектами
— будущие партнёры
Давайте это исправим.
💬 Напишите в комментариях:
1️⃣ Город
2️⃣ Чем занимаетесь
3️⃣ Какую задачу хотите решить с помощью ИИ
Мой пример:
Петропавловск
Развиваю …
💰 Почему 90% людей не зарабатывают с ИИ
Честно.
ИИ сегодня есть почти у всех.
ChatGPT, Qwen, Claude, Kimi.
Но деньги появляются у единиц.
Почему?
Потому что большинство используют ИИ так:
❌ «Напиши пост»
❌ «Придумай идею»
❌ «Сделай красиво»
И получают обычный результат.
Как ИИ реально начинает приносить деньги
Используйте его не как генератор текста,
а как инструмент мышления.
Вот простой рабочий запрос:
Я хо…
🚫 Забудь про астрологов и гадалок
ChatGPT делает это БЕСПЛАТНО и ТОЧНЕЕ:
- Раскроет твоё предназначение
- Покажет точный путь к богатству
- Найдёт скрытые таланты
- Предскажет ключевые моменты жизни
Всё, что нужно — твоя дата рождения и 7 волшебных промптов.
Результаты шокируют. Проверено.
🔥 Все 7 промптов уже здесь: https://t.me/c/3535810557/7/65
💰 Разбираем проект подписчика
Написали:
1️⃣ Проект по снижению тревоги
2️⃣ Сырое понимание
3️⃣ Доход 100 000
Смотрите внимательно.
Ошибка не в доходе.
Ошибка в размытости.
«Снижение тревоги» — это направление.
Это не продукт.
Чтобы выйти на 100 000, нужно:
— Чётко понять для кого
— Выбрать формат
— Назвать конкретный результат
— Посчитать модель дохода
🤖 Промпт для упаковки
Скопируйте👇:
Помоги упаковать проект…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ii_prosto_bayazitov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
1️⃣ ИИ для жизни (порядок, цели, планирование, гармония без перегруза)13%
2️⃣ ИИ для контента (посты, Reels, воронки, рост канала)42%
3️⃣ ИИ для дохода (продукты, упаковка эксперта, продажи)54%
4️⃣ Разбор ваших реальных задач (вы пишете проблему — я показываю решение)29%
The shares total 138%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 9 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИИ просто — промпты и примеры для жизни” (@ii_prosto_bayazitov), 344 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ii_prosto_bayazitov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.