Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for «СВЯЗЬ» с Игорем Кимом

Channel

«СВЯЗЬ» с Игорем Кимом

@igorkim_lab

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

15,321subscribers

-300 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002814935799
TypeChannel
Username@igorkim_lab
DescriptionЭто телеграм-канал психолога Игоря Кима - пространство для восстановления, честности и внутренней работы Вступить в закрытый клуб https://t.me/tribute/app?startapp=sNsp Запись на консультацию ⤵️ WA: https://l.clck.bar/6cf3d1 TG: t.me/igorkim_coaching
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held43
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/igorkim_lab

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

15,30915,67515,49221 August 2026 — 15,621 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,623 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,613 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,608 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,621 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,628 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,641 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,675 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,665 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,651 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,618 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,603 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,606 subscribers6 September 2026 — 15,569 subscribers12 September 2026 — 15,539 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,480 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,435 subscribers18 September 2026 — 15,404 subscribers30 September 2026 — 15,344 subscribers6 October 2026 — 15,352 subscribers10 October 2026 — 15,363 subscribers13 October 2026 — 15,367 subscribers15 October 2026 — 15,362 subscribers16 October 2026 — 15,354 subscribers16 October 2026 — 15,361 subscribers17 October 2026 — 15,346 subscribers18 October 2026 — 15,355 subscribers19 October 2026 — 15,353 subscribers20 October 2026 — 15,364 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,343 subscribers24 October 2026 — 15,317 subscribers25 October 2026 — 15,309 subscribers26 October 2026 — 15,348 subscribers27 October 2026 — 15,359 subscribers28 October 2026 — 15,367 subscribers29 October 2026 — 15,357 subscribers30 October 2026 — 15,361 subscribers31 October 2026 — 15,363 subscribers1 November 2026 — 15,368 subscribers2 November 2026 — 15,363 subscribers3 November 2026 — 15,343 subscribers4 November 2026 — 15,327 subscribers5 November 2026 — 15,321 subscribers15,32121 August 20265 November 2026
43 measurements spanning 76 days, net -300. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,254–15,730 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 21:2915,321-6
4 Nov 2026, 22:3015,327-16
3 Nov 2026, 01:3615,343-20
2 Nov 2026, 03:3415,363-5
1 Nov 2026, 04:4915,368+5
31 Oct 2026, 06:3415,363+2
30 Oct 2026, 03:4015,361+4
29 Oct 2026, 03:5015,357-10
28 Oct 2026, 05:1515,367+8
27 Oct 2026, 05:1015,359+11
26 Oct 2026, 02:1015,348+39
25 Oct 2026, 05:2815,309-8
24 Oct 2026, 08:3815,317-26
22 Oct 2026, 09:2615,343-21
20 Oct 2026, 23:0615,364+11
19 Oct 2026, 21:0915,353-2
18 Oct 2026, 21:1615,355+9
17 Oct 2026, 19:3715,346-15
16 Oct 2026, 21:4815,361+7
16 Oct 2026, 01:1715,354first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.57%
avg views ÷ 15,321 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,310
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held51 (5 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total18,383
Reactions total454
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 05:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
367
Videos
196
Links
481

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2h 29m
Average length
24m 57s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,483 reactions across 49 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤91461.6%
🔥39626.7%
👍1238.29%
🥰352.36%
👏151.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,483 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 51 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @igorkim_lab. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 09:03 UTC557 views19 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

Как выбирать отношения после разочарований Когда уже приходилось терпеть, ждать и сомневаться в себе, хочется одного: больше не попасть туда же. Но страх остаться одной иногда торопит. Человек просто ответил, не исчез, проявил внимание — и уже кажется особенным. Хотя ты ещё почти ничего о нём не знаешь. Это не значит, что сначала надо совсем избавиться от тревоги и только потом знакомиться. Можно тревожиться и всё…

❤18👍1

Signed Игорь Ким

2 Nov 2026, 09:04 UTC840 views39 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

Жизнь без мужчины — не зал ожидания Я замечаю, как время без отношений иногда превращается в подготовку к отношениям. Надо стать спокойнее, красивее, интереснее. Будто собственная жизнь пока ещё не началась. Но у этого времени есть ценность и без будущей встречи. Можно разобраться, где раньше ты соглашалась против себя. Что в отношениях для тебя недопустимо. На что ты больше не хочешь закрывать глаза. Это пригодит…

❤26🔥11👍2

Signed Игорь Ким

2 Nov 2026, 02:22 UTC896 views62 reactionsread 6 November 2026

1.000.000

🔥36❤17👏7👍2

Signed Игорь Ким

31 Oct 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,150 views17 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Три книги, с которых можно начать разговор о близости «Пять языков любви» Гэри Чепмена. Можно использовать как повод спросить друг друга: по каким поступкам ты понимаешь, что тебя любят? Не обязательно искать один-единственный «язык» и подгонять под него человека. Гораздо интереснее заметить, что для вас действительно имеет значение. «Танец гнева» Харриет Лернер. Для тех, кто устал быть хорошей и сглаживать углы. О…

❤17

Signed Игорь Ким

28 Oct 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,320 views44 reactions2 Starsread 6 November 2026

Самое большое осознание Я не был хорошим мужем. И не был хорошим отцом. Помогая семейным парам, женщинам, я не смог сохранить собственные отношения. Мои браки разрушались. Я терял связь со своими детьми. Я искренне о многом жалею. И, может быть, поэтому так хорошо понимаю боль тех, кого бросали люди, недавно клявшиеся в вечной любви. Кому в ответ на тепло давали безразличие и холод. Я понимаю эту боль ещё и потом…

❤34🔥6👏4

Signed Игорь Ким

26 Oct 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,220 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Блог как способ услышать собственный голос Я всё чаще замечаю, что ведение блога бывает не только способом делиться мыслями или набирать аудиторию. Для кого-то это возможность наконец сформулировать то, что давно происходит внутри. Речь не обязательно о текстах. Можно записывать голос, снимать видео, фотографировать, делиться короткими наблюдениями. Вопрос не в том, насколько эффектно это выглядит. Вопрос в том, ес…

❤14

Signed Игорь Ким

24 Oct 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,280 views31 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Вечером после расставания бывает тяжелее Днём держат дела. Нужно куда-то ехать, с кем-то говорить, что-то решать. А вечером становится тихо — и поднимается всё, от чего удавалось отвлечься. Я часто замечаю это после расставания. Потеря касается не только человека, но и привычного устройства дня: кому написать, с кем поужинать, чей голос услышать перед сном. В такой вечер не обязательно требовать от себя собраться.…

❤28👍3

Signed Игорь Ким

23 Oct 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,320 views16 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Накатила на меня сегодня какая-то ностальгия. После ужина включил на нашей колонке саундтрек к рок-опере «Юнона и Авось». Сидел, слушал эти печальные песни и думал про графа Резанова и его Кончиту. Про судьбу этих людей, про их любовь и про то, чем вся эта история закончилась. И вдруг мне стало интересно, а что, если посмотреть на эту историю с точки зрения современной психологии отношений? Как бы мы сегодня оценили…

❤11🔥5

Signed Игорь Ким

21 Oct 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,330 views59 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Иногда на меня находит тихая печаль. Не горечь и не тоска — просто лёгкое, щемящее чувство, что я встретил любовь всей своей жизни слишком поздно. Мне было сорок восемь. Да, рядом были женщины. Рождались дети. Шла работа, движение, суета. И всё же теперь я понимаю, как много мне не хватало той близости, которую я узнал с Катей. Её голоса, спокойствия, внутреннего света. Иногда хочется вернуться в те годы, где нам …

❤55🔥3👏1

Signed Игорь Ким

19 Oct 2026, 09:03 UTC≈1,420 views20 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Уверенность собирается из небольших поступков Ты откладываешь разговор. Сомневаешься перед решением. Проглатываешь неудобство. Хочется шагнуть вперёд, но сначала бы почувствовать себя увереннее. Я думаю, мы часто ждём от уверенности не того. Будто однажды станет совсем не страшно, и тогда можно будет начать. Но опереться на себя помогает и другой опыт: было неловко, я всё-таки попробовала и выдержала. Получилось н…

❤14🥰4👍2

Signed Игорь Ким

17 Oct 2026, 09:04 UTC≈1,520 views33 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Иногда нужно сменить обстановку Другие улицы. Незнакомое кафе. Дорога, по которой ещё не ходила. Мне кажется, ценность путешествий иногда именно в этом: привычный день перестаёт повторяться по кругу. На время ты выходишь из режима «дом — работа — заботы» и замечаешь то, на что давно не обращала внимания. В дороге бывает легче услышать свои мысли. Понять, как устала. Увидеть, где всё время соглашаешься, потому что …

❤27🔥6

Signed Игорь Ким

14 Oct 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,670 views31 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Договорились — или просто закончили разговор? У меня на консультации была семейная пара — очень разные люди. Внешне, эмоционально, культурно. Никогда бы не подумал, что они могут быть вместе. Но оказалось, что могут. Крепкий брак, вместе больше десяти лет. Я думаю, в отношениях важно не только совпадать. Важно ещё уметь договариваться, когда вы не совпадаете. Настоящая договорённость — не «никто не доволен, но все…

❤19🔥9👏3

Signed Игорь Ким

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @igorkim_lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTCAnonymous Poll73 voters

В июле интенсив получился очень удачным, кстати. Посмотрите отзывы👆В августе хочу сделать еще один интенсив (так же по доступной цене) - тема М/Ж. Какую тему выбрали бы?

  1. Как найти достойного мужчину и подготовить себя к встрече с ним34%
  2. Как стать значимой в отношениях и получать любовь, заботу, уважение, ухаживания32%
  3. Уйти или остаться?23%
  4. Как построить здоровые отношения (житейские мудрости и правила)33%
  5. Как отпустить того, кто уже ушёл26%
  6. Почему ко мне снова притягиваются не те21%
  7. Свой вариант в комментариях👇1%

The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

8 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTCAnonymous Poll101 voters

Какой у вас сейчас статус?

  1. Одна, и меня это НЕ устраивает41%
  2. Одна, и мне так нормально19%
  3. Отношения есть, но мне в них плохо28%
  4. Отношения есть, и все хорошо14%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“«СВЯЗЬ» с Игорем Кимом” (@igorkim_lab), 15,321 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/igorkim_lab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.