Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Игорь Ким вдохновляет...

Channel

Игорь Ким вдохновляет...

@igorkim_coach

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,762subscribers

+104 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001546680670
TypeChannel
Username@igorkim_coach
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/igorkim_coach

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,6581,7621,71021 August 2026 — 1,658 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,658 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,660 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,742 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,761 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,749 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,754 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,759 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,754 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,762 subscribers21 August 202616 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 26 days, net +104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,642–1,778 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 04:211,762+8
12 Sept 2026, 00:191,754-5
8 Sept 2026, 01:201,759+5
2 Sept 2026, 16:281,754+5
30 Aug 2026, 23:141,749-12
28 Aug 2026, 00:141,761+19
25 Aug 2026, 09:051,742+82
22 Aug 2026, 07:361,660+2
21 Aug 2026, 13:001,658no change
21 Aug 2026, 12:461,658first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 16s
Average length
3m 05s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

154 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6039.0%
👍4831.2%
🔥4428.6%
custom 530757646676919302021.30%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @igorkim_coach. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 August 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC101 views2 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Forwarded from @igorkim_lab

Мое интервью на Litres.

👍2

Signed Игорь Ким

21 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC183 views9 reactionsread 21 August 2026
File

Написал текст про выздоровление вне АН

👍63

Signed Игорь Ким

21 Aug 2026, 01:54 UTC205 views6 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Давайте представим, что человечество придумало, как лечить химическую зависимость. По-настоящему лечить. Не просто добиваться многолетнего воздержания, а каким-то образом убирать у человека то самое зияющее пустое место внутри, из-за которого ему снова и снова хочется использовать психоактивные вещества, чтобы хотя бы ненадолго изменить своё состояние. Звучит фантастически? Когда-то фантастикой казалось многое. Ан

👍6

Signed Игорь Ким

19 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC917 views2 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Довольно приятный фильм. Сет Роган - очень смешной чел. Талант несомненный. Пенелопа Круз - как всегда, прекрасная роль. Эдвард Нортон - я его даже не признал. Всегда приятно видеть этого замечательного актера. А вот Оливию Уайлд я как-то не особо ценил раньше. А оказалось, что она не только сыграла главную роль (причем неплохо сыграла), но была главным режиссером картины. И сняла вот такое камерное, уютное, смешное,

2

Signed Игорь Ким

17 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC392 views2 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Знаю, что здесь есть люди с химической зависимостью. Хочу спросить. Скажите, от чего конкретно вы убегали с помощью веществ? Какая жизненная ситуация стала триггером для избегания?

2

Signed Игорь Ким

14 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC589 views6 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Решил почитать чего-нибудь новенькое. Накачал себе разного.

6

Signed Игорь Ким

14 Aug 2026, 02:21 UTC499 views2 reactions1 Starread 21 August 2026
Forwarded from @igorkim_lab

Моя книга появилась в электронном виде на Litres. Вот здесь можно посмотреть.

🔥2

Signed Игорь Ким

13 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC531 viewsread 21 August 2026

Каждый день мне пишут люди, которые ушли из АН или пострадали от действий членов АН. Я все думаю, когда это закончится. Но это не заканчивается.

Signed Игорь Ким

13 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC523 views7 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

На одной полке с Дейлом Карнеги. Большая честь для меня.

5🔥2

Signed Игорь Ким

13 Aug 2026, 04:40 UTC492 views1 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Только что впервые в жизни сыграл в пиклбол. Вообще с ракетками я дружу давно. Ещё в школе мы бесконечно рубились в настольный теннис. Потом был бадминтон — нормальный, на счёт и на площадке. Разумеется, большой теннис. В последние годы — новомодный падел. И вот дошла очередь до пиклбола. Кстати, говорят, что пиклбол — один из самых быстрорастущих видов спорта в мире. И теперь я, кажется, понимаю почему. Пожалуй,

1

Signed Игорь Ким

12 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC400 viewsread 21 August 2026

АНОНИМНЫЙ БРАТ СОРВАЛСЯ

Signed Игорь Ким

12 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC484 views16 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Сегодня увидел новость: Брэд Питт после семи лет трезвости снова начал пить. И она попалась мне очень вовремя. Несколько дней назад я написал здесь, что после многих лет в программе ухожу из Анонимных Наркоманов. Я получил огромное количество сообщений. Кто-то меня поддержал. Кто-то написал, что тоже ушёл из АН и прекрасно живёт. А кто-то воспринял моё решение почти как объявление о скором самоубийстве. И я понимаю п

👍106

Signed Игорь Ким

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @igorkim_coach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Игорь Ким вдохновляет...” (@igorkim_coach), 1,762 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/igorkim_coach.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.