Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Иван Глушенков🇨🇭— 500 дней до сингулярности (16.04.2025 — 29.08.2026)

@iglushenkov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,308subscribers

-71 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001461274818
TypeChannel
Username@iglushenkov
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iglushenkov

Growth

8,3088,3798,343.57 August 2026 — 8,379 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,379 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,375 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,341 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,308 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,297–8,390 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 10:158,308-33
10 Aug 2026, 19:458,341-34
7 Aug 2026, 16:148,375-4
7 Aug 2026, 08:318,379no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:218,379first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.40%
avg views ÷ 8,308 subscribers
Avg views / post
615
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (23 January 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,844
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

249 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10241.0%
🔥5823.3%
5421.7%
187.23%
🕊72.81%
🫡41.61%
😢31.20%
💔20.803%
🤝10.402%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 249reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 18 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iglushenkov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 January 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC407 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @tldr_tany

Про скилы и нейрояз Полгода у нас уже есть агенство UplinkAI.me, уже 50+ клиентов и мы делаем ИИ нейтив компанию, сейчас Макс очень помогает в этом и фокусимся туда. У нас все встречи, переписки в чате и все данные по клиентам записываются, собираются в артефакты, куча скилов, текущие и выложенные посты анализируются, мы задротим в парсинг линкедина, чтобы вытаскивать лучшие референсные профили и залетающие виральные

6🔥2😢2

5 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC417 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Жиза, также замечаю, что нейронки очень плохо понимают границы того, что достоверно и доступно, а чего нет, и оч плохо понимают клиентский опыт реальный живой, его пульс, поэтому их нельзя пока спросить насколько этот продукт удобен будет и какая когнитивная нагрузка им пользоваться, про читабельность очень плохо отвечает и чувствует, не понимает как люди потребляют информацию, действуют на основе нее. Я не уверен д

🔥4

20 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC≈1,020 views11 reactions7 Starsread 12 August 2026

#вакансия Хайрю C-level Head of eComm в банк. Запускаем онлайн банкинг (acquiring, accounts, issuing, POS) в Европе для существующего традиционного оффлайн банка. Ищем бизнесово-продуктового человека который уже запускал / лидил от и до ровно такую штуку (запуск с нуля эквайринга с открытием проектов в виза / мастеркард, вайт-лейбл запуск аккаунтов, карт и терминалов), опыт планирования на 3-5 лет и управления семи

🔥83

8 Jul 2026, 16:28 UTC893 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Let’s see how that age. | Давайте посмотрим как это состарится. Меня тут занятули обратно в bio/acc, я сопротивлябсь и пытаюсь остаться в финансах :) Если вы не запускаете Fable 5 Ultracode с этим промтом как минимум раз в день — вы не испывали ИИ и еще долго не испытаете. Прогнал его по всем своим постам, сообщениям, контактам, эвентам, 10гб выгрузке из ноушен, почте, переписке с другими ии, тронуло до глубины ду

🔥4

8 Jul 2026, 16:28 UTC≈1,330 views15 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

С вами нерегулярная рубрика “новости про препараты от Альцгеймера”. В субботу вечером в Х был опубликован тред, наделавший локального шума (https://x.com/DouglasYaoDY/status/2070904914050797582). Дуглас Яо, PhD в вычислительной биологии, основатель стартапа Pace Pharmaceuticals, заявил, что изобрел и синтезировал лекарство от Альцгеймера – в своей домашней биолаборатории, собранной в гараже. Препарат назван PAC-832

🔥103🕊2

13 Jun 2026, 08:14 UTC≈1,490 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @denissexy

Не отпускает меня как-то ожидание хтони, от того куда идет мир разработки софта Сегодня в ИТ индустрии часто обсуждают АИ-навыки разработчиков, в контексте типа: ❔– а насколько инструмент Х ускоряет АИ-разработчика vs не-AI разработчика? ❔– а вот кто эту кучу слопа ревьювить будет, а? ❔– а вот пузырь лопнет и посмотрим как окупаться будут LLM эти ваши, сразу вспомните что кожаный выгоднее Это же все временные разг

82🔥2💔1

13 Jun 2026, 08:14 UTC≈1,200 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Это первый или второй репост в истории этого канала, в свете сегодняшних событий (блокировка fable 5) я затрудняюсь написать лучше. Что это значит для монополий, капитала и рынка — фиг знает, софт точно станет надежнее, вероятно защита существующих позиций, ревеню и рынка станет глобальным приоритетом всех существующих компаний, в значительно большей степени чем инновации и расширение. Вообще поражаюсь какое огромн

64

12 May 2026, 06:11 UTC≈1,820 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Так, я в Париже 🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷 начиная с сегодня на пару недель, внедряю ИИ в крупную ювелирную компанию про которую все знают, давайте соберем сходку локальную, девиртуализируемся, скиньте крутым Парижским друзьям. Или зовите просто на кофе / на движухи / пробежки / в офис своего стартапа :) https://t.me/+0esFv1qfsHVlMjI0 @iglushenkov

1710🔥4

5 May 2026, 08:35 UTC≈2,100 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ребят есть запрос на познакомиться с финансовыми организациями и рекламными агенствами размера от 50 человек, сделали пару крутых кейсов на масштабе 200-1000 человек, хочется нести экспертизу в рынок, плачу $10-50k реферальных за хорошее интро. Что делали: Внедряли Claude.ai на масштабе всех не технарских отделов (овнеры CFO, MLRO, COO, Analytics, Media Buying), оказалось много неочевидных моментов, включая доступ

4

19 Mar 2026, 14:49 UTC≈2,560 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

я предпочту (один ответ)

  1. быть вписанным в иторию17%
  2. быть вписанным в каптейбл13%
  3. не знаю что такое каптейбл70%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Mar 2026, 13:00 UTC≈2,720 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Представьте, что сейчас 2030 год. Что происходит в мире? Через 4 года мы вернёмся к этому посту и сверим ваши прогнозы. Поставил отложку. Мои предсказания: • рак научились лечить • старение замедлили • роботы стали повседневностью у богатых • brain-computer interfaces показывают чудеса уровня телепатии • появятся удивительные новые материалы и уровень 5* отеля в Швейцарии будет доступен в любой деревне где есть эле

12🔥96🕊2

10 Feb 2026, 08:10 UTC≈3,400 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

По этому же проекту нужна бренд-консультация / креативный инпут, победителю $1000 Задача — придумать название для neobank for b2b на европейский рынок? Критерии * .com домен доступен * при сокращении на насдаке будет нормально воспринят как европейский / западный * произношение простое для англоговорящих (не знаю как вы такое проверите если я это на русском пишу) * поисковые запросы / по ключевым словам можно будет

3🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @iglushenkov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Mar 2026, 14:49 UTCAnonymous Poll300 voters

я предпочту (один ответ)

  1. быть вписанным в иторию17%
  2. быть вписанным в каптейбл13%
  3. не знаю что такое каптейбл70%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Иван Глушенков🇨🇭— 500 дней до сингулярности (16.04.2025 — 29.08.2026)” (@iglushenkov), 8,308 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iglushenkov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.