Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Igaming CPO

@igamingcpo

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,969subscribers

+97 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002650007832
TypeChannel
Username@igamingcpo
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/igamingcpo

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

8,680 average views per post against 6,969 subscribers — an engagement rate of 124.6%. Across the 40,483 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 7.15% and 26.5%, with a median of 14.2%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured19 of 19 published in the window (0 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled164,970
Mature posts only124.6% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers6,969 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 40,483 channels · p10 3.46% · p25 7.15% · p50 14.2% · p75 26.5% · p90 43.8%
Position in cohort99.444th percentile · 8.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.06% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

6,8726,9696,920.56 August 2026 — 6,872 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,872 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,892 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,916 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,969 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +97. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,857–6,984 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:046,969+53
9 Aug 2026, 02:016,916+24
6 Aug 2026, 12:016,892+20
6 Aug 2026, 03:176,872no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:046,872first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
124.6%
avg views ÷ 6,969 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,680
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.256%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held22 (13 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total164,970
Reactions total423
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

350 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13338.0%
🔥12836.6%
5014.3%
🤔133.71%
82.29%
👌72.00%
👏61.71%
👾30.857%
🆒10.286%
🤷10.286%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 496reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC≈1,490 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📞Продуктовые коммуникации на тир 1 до этапа FTD Всем привет! Сейчас активно изучаю воронки на различных продуктах и поделюсь с вами вариациями модальных окон до FTD на тир 1 рынках. Смотрел в основном Германию, Португалию и немножко остальной Европы 📌Для начала разберем какие бывают ивенты для показа модальных окон до успешного первого депозита: • Website opened • Website swiped to 2nd + screen • Registration Windo

👍12🔥8

6 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC≈2,420 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Welcome Pack c вагером х1 на примере проекта Blazespins Всем привет! Сегодня разберем пример велком пака, где депозитный бонус с вагером x1. При чем даже не на криптовом казино, а на фиатном. На проекте есть и обычные бонусы, но параллельно также предлагают No Wager линейку. Смотрел проект из Канады 📕Условия у всех бонусов одинаковые и доступны до 3 депозита включительно: • Deposit Bonus - 50% • Min Deposit - 30$ •

👍8🔥54👾3🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈2,040 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

От самописной легаси-платформы до +36% GGR за 12 месяцев: кейс VOX Casino × Kanggiten🚀 У VOX Casino свой движок перестал вывозить. A/B-тестов на нём не было, так что продукт катили вслепую, да и нужных провайдеров в каталоге недобирали. VOX переехал на Kanggiten и за год прогнал 50 тестов на всех пяти этапах воронки, от регистрации до удержания. Что в материале 👇 🔧 Как прошла полная миграция на микросервисную архи

👍9🔥41

5 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC≈3,870 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌐 Igaming Market: 2808 казино, 1433 оператора, 76 ГЕО, 51 лицензия, 7914 бонусов Всем привет! В рамках igamingcpo.com мы решили сделать Igaming Market - удобную базу данных для изучения рынка Igaming операторов, брендов, лицензий и так далее 📌Что доступно уже сейчас: 1️⃣ Casinos by GEO - 76 ГЕО с удобным скорингом основной информации: • Сколько всего брендов на ГЕО • Сколько открылось в 2026 году на каждом ГЕО • В

🔥146👍6🤔21👏1

3 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC≈2,570 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📛Портрет игрока, близкого к попаданию в Churn сегмент 1️⃣ Финансовое поведение • Снижение среднего депозита • Увеличение интервала между депозитами • Отсутствие повторных депозитов в рамках одной сессии • Снижение общего объема ставок 2️⃣ Игровая активность • Сокращение количества игровых сессий • Значительное уменьшение продолжительности сессий • Снижение количества сыгранных спинов в рамках 1 сессии • Реже возвра

🔥115👍5👏2

30 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC≈2,880 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Platform Battle: 01. Tech VS BetB2B Всем привет! Начинаем наш второй батл платформ. Обе платформы вы хорошо знаете, должно быть занимательно) 💻Бренды на примере которых будем сравнивать: • 01. Tech - https://mellstroy.com/ (Доступен для РФ/Канады) • BetB2B - https://sapphirebet.com/en (Доступен для Индии/Канады) ❗️Проголосовать можно на https://igamingcpo.com/en/battle На картинке к посту вы увидите результат мое

👍154🔥3

30 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC≈2,510 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

SOFTSWISS Tech Race Summit продолжает усиливать программу. Помимо хэдлайнера Андрея Дороничева, конференция анонсировала профильную iGaming-панель Entertainment & Gamification Technologies. На сцене встретятся представители SOFTSWISS, HUB88, TrueLabel и Finteqhub, чтобы обсудить, какие игровые механики, персонализация и новые технологии сегодня реально влияют на вовлеченность игроков и бизнес-метрики операторов. 🔥

👌7👍6🔥5🤔3

29 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC≈6,080 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Топ 20 операторов на платформе Soft2bet Собрал для вас топ 20 операторов по кол-ву брендов. Весь список из 53 операторов с брендами можно глянуть на igamingcpo.com 7StarsPartners - 9 Mate Affiliates - 9 WOW Partners - 7 247Partners - 6 Boomerang Partners - 6 Mio Media Affiliates - 5 Strong Affiliates - 5 Affilirise Affiliates - 4 KNG Partners - 4 Alpha Affiliates - 3 Electric Affiliates - 3 Gypsy Affiliates - 3 Pa

👍1232

29 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC≈2,800 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

Чеклист по приоритезации фич для Igaming бренда/платформы 📌Что в документе: • 44 критерия для приоритезации фич • Название и описание для каждого критерия • Категория • Приоритет Подписывайся на канал @igamingcpo

🔥14👍91🤔1

27 Jul 2026, 07:06 UTC≈10,400 views31 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Собрал 136 Igaming брендов на платформе Soft2bet Всем привет! Сегодня хотел бы анонсировать Platform Radar - место, где можно быстро посмотреть основную информацию по брендам определенных платформ. 📌Что есть сейчас: • Добавлены 136 брендов на платформе Soft2bet • 1005 Welcome бонусов на разных ГЕО и условиями на этих брендах • Название бренда • Сайт бренда • Год запуска • Название лицензии • Языки • Название компан

🔥18👍84🤷1

23 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTC≈4,000 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Почему Mines до сих пор живее большинства новых игровых механик На днях посмотрел свежий репорт Blask по самым популярным казуальным играм в Европе. Если честно, особых сюрпризов в топе не оказалось. Crash по-прежнему доминируют, лидеры рынка практически не меняются, а большинство новых релизов пытаются скорее повторить успешные механики, чем придумать что-то действительно новое. Но один момент все же зацепил. В ре

11👍9🤔5🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @igamingcpo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 59,470 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Igaming CPO” (@igamingcpo), 6,969 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/igamingcpo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.