Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IFS 佛山资讯频道

Channel

IFS 佛山资讯频道

@ifsfoshan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

325subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001895731348
TypeChannel
Username@ifsfoshan
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ifsfoshan

Growth

3258 Aug 2026, 12:03 — 325 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 01:14 — 325 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 12:039 Aug 2026, 01:14
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 324–326 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 01:14325no change
8 Aug 2026, 12:03325first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

78 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3544.9%
🍾1417.9%
🫡1114.1%
👍911.5%
👏78.97%
😁11.28%
🥰11.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jul 2026, 13:24 UTC366 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

7月ifs已Verified,感谢各位的到来。

🫡11

4 Jul 2026, 04:57 UTCviews —

IFS 佛山资讯频道 pinned «今日ifs签到签退表格链接:https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1UtPtuJaLkLG9Y3rOvItbXEMRNQJJ8lMxWQN5xFQRvhE»

4 Jul 2026, 04:57 UTC471 viewsread 8 August 2026

今日ifs签到签退表格链接:https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1UtPtuJaLkLG9Y3rOvItbXEMRNQJJ8lMxWQN5xFQRvhE

14 Jun 2026, 09:51 UTC912 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

佛山7月份ifs来啦 ⏰ 时间:2026年7月4日1400 ~ 1600 📍地点:世纪莲地铁站 A 出口(太平洋咖啡) • Fev活动链接 • RSVP链接 • 签到&补给po:大吉狮(补给po生效时间1600-1730) • 1430拍合照 —————— 你必须完成: 1. 在1400-1600之间找poc线下签到。 2. 在签到表格出来后,将自己的profile数据复制粘贴到表单的`Start Stats Export`格中。确保自己取得至少10000ap后,再重复一次操作将自己的数据复制粘贴到表单的`End Stats Export`格中完成签退。(签到签退表单是同一个,签退最晚时间2359)。 3. 你必须在1400-1600期间hack一次签到或解密的po,hack出media即完成。 —————— 由于POC的问题,本次场次的区域填错了Chancheng,但实际上是Shunde。POC已尝试重新编辑但页面不生效

7 Jun 2026, 07:00 UTC718 viewsread 8 August 2026

再提醒一下,各位中奖「ITO EN」奖章的agent,可以到MD BASE找STAFF进行现场领奖。如果决定线上兑奖,请尽快联系@mingou 兑奖。奖章可自行兑换或赠与他人。7天内需要兑换,否则失效。

Signed mingo 🥭

7 Jun 2026, 03:52 UTC443 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @foshanmissiondayPhoto

佛山IFS&MD纪念相册已创建🏞 纪念相册链接 欢迎你在任务日的路上,留下更多的佛山仲夏回忆!

5

Signed mingo 🥭

6 Jun 2026, 13:06 UTC892 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

感谢各位参加今天的两场IFS,我们一起营造了一场全中国史上最盛大的IFS。今天的”MD before party“上午场共计61位玩家到场参与,下午场共计342位玩家到场参与。 今天的IFS根据规则,将分开上下午两场单独抽奖。所有在周四前报名的到场玩家均会获得抽奖资格,已经获取ITO EN的玩家,将会顺延下一位获奖。抽奖随机因子为当场的passcode,抽奖脚本与5月IFS场一样,详见附件 佛山6月IFS上午场「ITO EN passcode 」抽奖公示表 佛山6月IFS下午场「ITO EN passcode 」抽奖公示表 恭喜以下玩家获奖: 上午场: @hong422 @small2Sun @YYYYeast @nnnaiRfeR @angelsuen @AMWN @ambev @WWDS @GwokTsyn @Crystal7788 下午场: @kamikamy @KenlosKana @ResistanceCL

🍾14👏4🥰1

Signed mingo 🥭

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ifsfoshan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 876,693 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IFS 佛山资讯频道” (@ifsfoshan), 325 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ifsfoshan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.