Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for •|[ إفادات في علم الحديث ]|•

Channel

•|[ إفادات في علم الحديث ]|•

@ifaddit_2addittia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

758subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001225842446
TypeChannel
Username@ifaddit_2addittia
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ifaddit_2addittia

Growth

758761759.56 August 2026 — 761 subscribers6 August 2026 — 761 subscribers13 August 2026 — 758 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 758–761 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:48758-3
6 Aug 2026, 16:11761no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:07761first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.7%
avg views ÷ 758 subscribers
Avg views / post
119
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (12 April 202524 July 2026)
Views total119
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2025 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 19:07 UTC119 viewsread 6 August 2026

يقول ابن حجر: "وأعجب من العجب إطلاقُ كثيرٍ من الشافعية القول بقبول زيادة الثقة، مع أنَّ نصَّ الشافعيِّ يدلُّ على غير ذلك". - نزهة النظر صـ٧٠ قلت : ●والمَنقولُ عن أئمة الحديثِ المُتقدمين كعبد الرحمن بن مهدي، ويحيى القطان، وأحمد بن حنبل، ويحيى بن معين، وعلي بن المديني، والبخاريِّ، وأبي زرعة، وأبي حاتم، والنسائي، والدار قطنيِّ وغيرهم، اعتبارُ التَّرجيحِ فيما يتعلَّقُ بالزِّيادةِ وغيرها ولا يُعرف عن أحدٍ منهم إطلاقُ

17 Dec 2025, 23:32 UTC226 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kallma

📜📜📜 •|| النسخة المفقودة في عصرنا (إلا من رحم الله!) جاء في ترجمة جمال الدين الإسنوي الشافعي من "شذرات الذهب" (٨/ ٣٨٣-٣٨٩): " كان ناصحًا في التعليم، مع البر، والدين، والتواضع، والتودد .. يُقرب الضعيف المستهان، ويحرص على إيصال الفائدة للبليد .. ويَذكر عنده المبتدئ الفائدة المطروقة فيُصغي إليه كأنه لم يسمعها؛ جبرًا لخاطره .. مع فصاحة العبارة، وحلاوة المحاضرة والمروءة البالغة " كـنّاشة الـجــ🇩🇿ـيــجْلـي https://t.

👍1

25 Nov 2025, 16:35 UTC254 viewsread 6 August 2026

🍃🍃🍃 • || مشاهير تأخر طلبهم للحديث و الرحلة في طلبه طاعة لوالديهم 1/ الإمام الحافظ، راوية الإسلام: محمَّد بن بشَّار، الملقَّب (بُنْدار)، (ت252هـ)، ذكر الذَّهبي في ترجمته من «سير أعلام النبلاء» (12/145) ما نصُّه: «قال عبد الله بن جعفر بن خاقان المروزي: سمعت بندارًا يقول: أردت الخروج -يعني: الرحلة- فمنعتني أمِّي، فأطعتها، فبورك لي فيه». 2/ الحافظ المسند أبو العبَّاس أحمد بن علي بن مسلم الأبَّار (ت290هـ)، ذكر الذَّه

19 Oct 2025, 16:36 UTC276 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

•••• •|| كيف يعرف الإدراج في (المتون) و (الأسانيد)!؟ [.. ◆ مسألة : كيف يعرف الإدراج في المتن ؟ 1/ إما بوروده [مجيئه] منفصلاً في رواية أخرى كما مر معنا حديث ابن مسعود رضي الله عنه . 2/ تنصيص إمام من الأئمة . 3/ تصريح الراوي نفسه بالإدراج كما بيَّن ذلك ابن مسعود رضي الله عنه حين أن قال ( قال النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم كلمة وقلت أنا كلمة..) 4/ إستحالة أن يكون ذلك القدر المضاف من كلامه عليه الصلاة والسلام. كما مرّ معنا

👍1

19 Oct 2025, 16:31 UTC204 viewsread 6 August 2026

💎 بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم 💎 •|[ روابط تفريغات دروس شرح البيقونية ليسهل على الطالب الوصول للمبحث الذي يريد يقرأ فيه ]|• https://t.me/ifaddit_2addittia 👇👇👇👇👇 💎 تفريغ مقدمة الشارح [رابط التفريغ] ⤵️ https://t.me/ifaddit_2addittia/37 💎 تفريغ الدرس الأول والدرس الثاني [رابط التفريغ (pdf)] ⤵️ https://t.me/ifaddit_2addittia/49 💎 تفريغ مبحث الصحيح [روابط التفريغ] ⤵️ https://t.me/ifaddit_2addittia/78 https://t.me/ifaddi

17 Oct 2025, 15:04 UTC163 viewsread 6 August 2026

🍀 🍀 🍀 •|| إفــادات حديثية •|| الراوي الضعيف لا يقبل جرحه في من هو أحسن منه حالا) أو ( من كان ثقة) - مثال :: قال الجوزجاني حدثت عن معتمر عن ليث يعني ابن أبي سليم قال كان بالكوفة كذابان فمات. - أحدهما السدي - والكلبي. كذا قال و(ليث أشد ضعفا من السدي). “ التهذيب - ترجمة إسماعيل بن عبد الرحمان بن ابي كريمة السدي- (1/ 314)“ 📚 قلت : فقول الحافظ ابن حجر رحمه الله ( كذا قال وليث اشد ضعفا من السدي) تطبيق لقاعدة عدم ق

17 Oct 2025, 14:58 UTC166 viewsread 6 August 2026

🔻🔻🔻🔻 •|| تحسينات الإمام البخاري رحمه الله تعالى •• الحافظ ابن حجر -رحمه الله- يوافق ابن الصلاح على أنَّ البخاري استعمل المعنى الإصطلاحي للحسن لذاته ولغيره، كما في كتابه [النكت]. • لأنَّ ابن الصلاح يريد أن يوصل إلينا فائدة، وهي أنَّ الترمذي -رحمه الله- شهَّر هذا الإصطلاح وإن كان قد وُجد عند مشايخه من قبله كالبخاري، وأيضًا طبقة مشايخ البخاري كأحمد وغيرهم، بل حتى عند الدارقطني، والبيهقي وغيرهم من الأئمة. ● فيريد أ

11 Jul 2025, 19:05 UTC362 viewsread 6 August 2026

🔷وقد تبيِّن أن هناك بعض التعديلات فتم إلحاقها عشيّة هذا اليوم الجمعة ١٦/ محرم/ ١٤٤٧هـ ▪️ https://t.me/ifaddit_2addittia

11 Jul 2025, 19:05 UTC354 viewsread 6 August 2026

•|| هل ذم الحافظ المزي مختصرات الذهبي أم مدحها!!؟ ● قال تقي الدين محمد بن أحمد الفاسي في ذيله على "سير أعلام النبلاء" الموسوم بــ"تعريف ذوي العلا بمن لم يذكر الذهبي من النبلا" (٤٨): نقلا عن الحافظ المزي قوله -بعد نظره في مختصرات الذهبي-: [الشيخ شمس الدين الذهبي إذا أختصر شيئا أذهبه]. • فقال الفاسي معلقا وموضحا لعبارة المزي: [فتردد الناس هل أراد بقوله أذهبه أعدمه أو أحسنه كما تحسن الكتب بالذهب؟ والأول أقرب. والله أع

9 Jul 2025, 20:55 UTC261 viewsread 6 August 2026

▪️ مَوت العلَماء من أعظَم المصَائب قَالَ الشَّيخ اِبْن عثيمِين - رَحِمَهُ اللّٰه -: فَقْد العالم لَيس فقدًا لشخصِيته فحسب، ولكنه فَقْد لجزء من ترَاث النبوة، جزء كبِير بحَسب ما قَام به هذا العالم المفقُود من التحقِيق، فواللّٰه إن فقد العالم النافِع لا يُعوَّض عنه مال ولا عقَار ولا متاع ولا ديَار، بل فقده مصِيبة على الإسلام والمُسلمين، لا يُعوض عَنه إلا أن ييسر اللّٰه مَن يخلفه بين العالمين، فيقُوم بمثل مَا قام به من

9 Jul 2025, 20:51 UTC235 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kallma

📀📀📀📀📀 🔷بلغني قبل قليل وفاة الشيخ ربيع بن هادي المدخلي رحمه الله وغفر له https://t.me/kallma

7 Jul 2025, 16:16 UTC227 viewsread 6 August 2026

🌿🌿 •|| إنموذج من إجلال العلم عند الأئمة[ كانو في مجلسه كأنهم في صلاة!!] قال أحمد بن سنان : كان وكيعٌ لا يُتحدث في مجلسه ولا يُبرَى قلم ولا يُبتسم ولا يقوم أحدٌ قائما ، كانو في مجلسه كأنهم في صلاة فإن أنكر منهم شيئا انتعل ودخل "مقدمة الجرح والتعديل" (1\232) https://t.me/ifaddit_2addittia

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ifaddit_2addittia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 201,335 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“•|[ إفادات في علم الحديث ]|•” (@ifaddit_2addittia), 758 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ifaddit_2addittia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.