2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 154–156 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 21:52
155
no change
9 Aug 2026, 12:16
155
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 24 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
34s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
113 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
102
90.3%
👌
4
3.54%
👍
3
2.65%
🔥
2
1.77%
⚡
1
0.885%
🤩
1
0.885%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2025 to 16 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«پنجرهی پشتی باز است»
در مجلهها همیشه چیزهایی هست که از قلم میافتند یا در قالب پروندهها و مطالب رسمی جا نمیشوند؛
«پنجرهی پشتی» در وبسایت طراحان ایده درست به همین دلیل باز شده است.
ستونی برای نوشتههای کوتاه، تأملها، روایتها و ایدههایی که میخواهند بیواسطهتر منتشر شوند.
اگر چیزی برای گفتن دارید — دربارهی دیزاین، فرهنگ، هنر، فناوری، شهر، رسانه، زیست دیجیتال و یا هر ایده و تجربهای که به شیوهای میانرشته…
🔸تفکر طراحی در زندگی روزمره
📝عیسی طاهریانفر
طراحها فقط اشیاء طراحی نمیکنند؛ آنها جهان را جور دیگری میبینند. این روایت، سفریست به ذهن یک دیزاینر؛ جایی که زندگی روزمره به مجموعهای از مسئلهها، تجربهها و امکانهای پنهان تبدیل میشود.
متنی درباره همدلی، مشاهده، شکست، خلاقیت و اینکه چگونه تفکر طراحی میتواند نه فقط محصولات، بلکه شیوهی زندگی ما را تغییر دهد.
🔸این یادداشت به قلم «عیسی طاهریانفر» و بیرون از مجله…
.
تفکر طراحی در زندگی روزمره
.
پیش از روایت:
طراحها فقط اشیا را طراحی نمیکنند؛ آنها جهان را جور دیگری میبینند. این روایت، سفری است به ذهن یک دیزاینر؛ جایی که زندگی روزمره به مجموعهای از مسئلهها، تجربهها و امکانهای پنهان تبدیل میشود. متنی درباره همدلی، مشاهده، شکست، خلاقیت و اینکه چگونه تفکر طراحی میتواند نه فقط محصولات، بلکه شیوه زندگی ما را تغییر دهد.
.
این روایت از من را در وبسایت مجله طراحان ایده بخوانی…
.
[اینجا همان جایی است که دیزاینرها باید وارد عمل شوند!]
. جامعه طراحی باید وارد عمل شود
. امضای این بیانیه یک تصمیم آگاهانه و اخلاقی است.
. سکوت به معنای بیطرفی نیست.
.
نزدیک به یک دهه پیش، نامهی سرگشادهی ویکتور مارگولین (Victor Margolin) و اتزیو مانزینی (Ezio Manzini) با عنوان «به پاخیزید برای دموکراسی»، از جامعهی دیزاین خواست تا مسئولیت خود را در شکلدهی به دموکراسی در سراسر جهان بپذیرد. آن نامه بیانگر درک رو …
.
تحلیل چندبعدی امید و ناامیدی
۱. لایهی فلسفی: از انتزاع تا واقعیت
در فلسفه، امید صرفن یک حس خوشایند نیست، بلکه یک «ضرورت هستیشناختی» است. ارنست بلوخ (Ernst Bloch) معتقد است که انسان همواره در وضعیت «هنوز-نه» (Not-Yet) زندگی میکند؛ یعنی پتانسیلهایی در تاریخ وجود دارند که منتظر عاملیت انسانی برای تحقق هستند [۱]. در مقابل، ناامیدی از نگاه سورن کییرکگور (Søren Kierkegaard) به معنای از دست دادن پیوند با خویشتن و جه…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @iessadesign. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 251,116 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IΣƧƧΛ DΣƧIGП” (@iessadesign), 155 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iessadesign.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
