Channel
@ieltswithmrrajabov
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
471subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002343194109 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ieltswithmrrajabov |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ieltswithmrrajabov |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 471 | +5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:02 | 466 | +18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 448 | -8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 456 | -11 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 467 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 472 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 472 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
495 reactions across 20 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 138 | 27.9% | |
| ⚡ | 78 | 15.8% | |
| 🆒 | 43 | 8.69% | |
| ❤ | 39 | 7.88% | |
| 🏆 | 34 | 6.87% | |
| 😎 | 32 | 6.46% | |
| 👏 | 31 | 6.26% | |
| 🤝 | 22 | 4.44% | |
| 🤣 | 15 | 3.03% | |
| 🐳 | 13 | 2.63% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 1.82% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 1.41% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 1.21% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 0.808% | |
| 🤗 | 4 | 0.808% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.606% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.606% | |
| 🤷♂ | 3 | 0.606% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 0.404% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.404% | |
| 5 further kinds | 7 | 1.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 495 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The line graph compares the proportion of full-time employees with a university degree in Australia between 2004 and 2012, while the table illustrates the average salary of graduates across two categories—maths and all—over the same period. Overall, both maths and all graduates followed broadly similar patterns, with the former consistently cording higher percentages. Although their figures initially grew notably, b…
🔥10🤝3🤓2⚡1🎄1🕊1🆒1
#Task1 - mixed 📚 Follow @ieltswithmrrajabov for daily inspiration and IELTS tips
🔥7😎5🤝2⚡1✍1🕊1🆒1
Whether adopting healthier lifestyles should be the responsibility of the government or of individuals themselves has led to an intense debate in recent years. While some believe that governments should introduce policies that encourage healthy living, others argue that people should take responsibility for their own lifestyles. Although government intervention can play a crucial role in changing people's attitudes t…
🔥11😎4🐳2🏆1🤝1
Assalomu Alaikum! #Task2 - discussion essay Some people think that governments should decide how people live in order to help them have healthier lives. Others think that individuals should decide their own lifestyles. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 📚 Follow @ieltswithmrrajabov for daily inspiration and IELTS tips
🔥7😎5⚡2❤1🐳1👀1🤝1
The line graph compares the number (measured in thousands) of overseas visitors to three areas—the coast, the mountains, and the lake— in one particular European country from 1987 to 2007. Overall, visiting these places became increasingly prevalent among overseas travelers, with the lake recording by far the most significant rise, despite a marked decline towards the end of the period. While the coast remained the …
⚡11🏆4🆒3👏2🔥2❤1🤝1😎1
#task1 - line graph 📚 Follow @ieltswithmrrajabov for daily inspiration and IELTS tips
😎7🆒5🐳4⚡2❤2🏆2🔥1🤔1
Today, some scientists believe that once a country reaches financial prosperity, any further economic growth contributes little to making its residents feel any more satisfied. While becoming a financially prosperous country plays a crucial role in citizens' lives, I firmly contend that wealth is not the sole factor in determining individuals' life satisfaction once a country has achieved a high level of prosperity. …
🆒7🔥5⚡3🏆3🐳2💯2❤1🌚1
Assalomu Alaikum. #Task2 - opinion essay. Some experts believe that once a country is already rich, any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens any more satisfied. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 📚 Follow @ieltswithmrrajabov for daily inspiration and IELTS tips
🔥7⚡6👏2👀1👌1💯1🤝1🤩1
These days, many parents are putting pressure on their children to become successful in life. While the main reasons are poverty and parents' desire to fulfil their own ambitions, I firmly contend that this is largely a negative development, as putting a great deal of pressure on the young may lead to unnecessary fatigue and stress, significantly reducing their productivity. There are a couple of compelling reasons …
😎7⚡5🔥5🏆3🆒2❤1🐳1👏1
#Task2 - two question Parents are putting a lot pressure on their children to succeed. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development? 📚 Follow @ieltswithmrrajabov for daily inspiration and IELTS tips
❤5🏆4🔥4⚡2🐳1👏1🤔1🤝1
The table illustrates population growth, the average number of births per woman, and life expectancy at birth in countries classified into three categories—high income, middle income, and low income—in two separate years: 2002 and 2004. Overall, the population growth rate varied across the three income groups, with low income countries recording the highest figures. Likewise, low income countries had by far the high…
⚡6🔥4🆒3❤2😎2✍1🏆1🐳1
Assalomu Alaikum! #Task1 - table A challenging one 📚 Follow @ieltswithmrrajabov for daily inspiration and IELTS tips
🔥8❤6👏2⚡1🏆1🐳1🕊1🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ieltswithmrrajabov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IELTS WITH MR_RAJABOV | 8.0” (@ieltswithmrrajabov), 471 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ieltswithmrrajabov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.