Channel
@iduckyliotru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
972subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001996841782 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iduckyliotru |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iduckyliotru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 972 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 984 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 984 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
14 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 35.7% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 21.4% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 14.3% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2025 to 9 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
я тут полгода молчал, потому что строил не то, что можно показать а то, что нельзя - себя в этом канале я не писал. но в другом - писал очень часто. про то, как закрывал микрозаймы, как менеджерил разработку в сбере, гербалайфе и астразенеке, как преподавал в полубреду, как искал того самого человека, постоянно терпел неудачи, но всё же нашёл то что искал там нет гайдов. там есть живой человек, который каждый день…
👍1
не так давно колесо фортуны сломалось немного, починили кстати, решил затестить. результат - это x2 к депу. норм по принтеру много апдейтов планируется вообще. будем понемногу оживлять его
и всё это моё) забесплатно. прикольно работать, сидя в библиотеке
👍2
Video message, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
😁3
think your database is fast? bright db - our dbaas - will leave it behind up to 10x faster on benchmarks. stay tuned for early access
ивент закончен. награды распределены 🎁 translation мы решили изменить условия выдачи наград за участие в ивентах теперь награда получают не только те кто собрали все 9 деталек пазла, но также и те, кто собрали 3 или 6 деталек если вы нашли 3 детали, то вам было начислено • 1 миллиард br • 1к гемов если 6, то • 5 миллиардов • 3к если 9, то • 15 миллиардов • 10к заходите в игру и проверяйте свои балансы 😎 игра …
🎁Новые подарки - ВСЁ? 🐻Почти все новые подарки торгуются по себе стоимости. Единственные кто торгуется в 1.5х-2х это Редо и Очки. Цены на подарки сейчас: 🎁 ~1.5❤️(1.1х) 🎁 ~2.2❤️(1.2х) 🎁 ~0.65❤️(1х) 🎁 ~46❤️(2х) 🎁 ~300❤️(2.5х) 🎁 -12❤️(1.3х) @GiftTach
и ещё +$10
👍2
+10% за час и без фьючей. норм. смотрим что будет дальше
у меня было $80 на бирже. решил их в insp закинуть. посмотрим что выйдет из этого
Тебе НЕ нужен лайфченж! Или что такое ловушка счастья. Лайфченж это для многих это форма погони за счастьем. Состояние из будущего, которое тебе важно достигнуть. Будет так много денег, что жизнь поменяется. Что в сущности для людей лайфченж, если копать еще глубже: - Попытка убежать от негатива: нищета, комплексы и etc - Штука, которая спасет в настоящем - Образ идеального будущего - Некое вечное счастье У тебя …
❤1💘1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @iduckyliotru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,005,384 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“iducky liot ru” (@iduckyliotru), 972 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iduckyliotru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.