Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 49 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,979–3,025 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 19:38
3,008
-5
17 Sept 2026, 05:16
3,013
-1
13 Sept 2026, 15:58
3,014
-4
9 Sept 2026, 22:39
3,018
+9
5 Sept 2026, 02:01
3,009
-1
1 Sept 2026, 17:34
3,010
-1
29 Aug 2026, 16:03
3,011
+7
26 Aug 2026, 23:53
3,004
-6
24 Aug 2026, 04:28
3,010
-1
20 Aug 2026, 18:22
3,011
-5
17 Aug 2026, 11:57
3,016
-4
14 Aug 2026, 00:36
3,020
+36
10 Aug 2026, 18:27
2,984
-4
7 Aug 2026, 12:39
2,988
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:33
2,988
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
215 reactions across 9 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
60
27.9%
🔥
41
19.1%
😍
24
11.2%
💯
21
9.77%
👍
16
7.44%
😁
15
6.98%
🤣
15
6.98%
❤🔥
12
5.58%
✍
4
1.86%
🤝
4
1.86%
🌚
1
0.465%
🙏
1
0.465%
🤩
1
0.465%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я люблю и ненавижу август. 19-го у меня день рождения, который уже давно день старения😆 И вроде это все еще лето, но это послеееедний месяц 😭 Некое прощание с моим самым любимым временем года… А раньше еще и школа была, брр))
Я очень стараюсь не грустить, что лето заканчивается, а больше радоваться, что оно вообще было.
Прощаться рано, впереди еще целых три недели. Можно еще много всего успеть! Повспоминайте свои п…
Как правильно формулировать цели, чтобы они воплощались в жизнь
По пятницам я стараюсь не умничать😅 Выходные на носу, да и вообще-то лето еще… Но) Мы ж с вами обсуждали суперрабочие техники марафона Блиновской и решили устроить себе ревизию мечт и мышления в целом.
Да и зря мы штоле расхламлялись?)) Пока энергии вагон, надо брать быка за рога💪🏻
Два года назад я постигала премудрости коучинга в одной из лучших акад…
Извенити, я еще не все сказала на сегодня 😂 Посмотрите, какая красота!.. Это новая обложка глянца «Мнение редакции может не совпадать». Очень мне нравится все, что делает топовый стилист Алеко, а именно он в этом журнале главред. Обложки у них всегда просто огонь-пожар!.. Янковский, Борисов, Паулина 😍 Они прям играют в кадре! 🔥
Все же глянец жил, жив и будет жить)) Мы вот с мужем иногда даже покупаем Минаевский журна…
Я «заболела» Марокко 15 лет назад, когда посмотрела полнометражный «Секс в большом городе-2». Действия типа происходят в Абу-Даби, но снимали фильм в невероятно кинематографичном Марракеше и его окрестностях.
Эта восточная сказка у побережья Атлантического океана до сих пор в моем виш-листе…🥹
Мечтаю увидеть голубые улочки, оранжевые волны дюн пустыни, шумные базары, магический вечерний Марракеш, белоснежную Касабла…
Обожаю 😂 Все самое интересное впереди))) Харошего уэчерочка, дарагие маи ♥️
🤣15💯6❤4🔥3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @idi_obnimu_dai_poduyu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Женщина и прочие неприятности @conflict_in · 49,458 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
Александр Бессонов @AleksBessonov · 60,570 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
Собачий Потрох @sobachkyn_potroh · 47,604 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
BUS.GOV.RU @gisgmu · 25,248 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Иди обниму, дай подую” (@idi_obnimu_dai_poduyu), 3,008 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/idi_obnimu_dai_poduyu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.